Adverse event reporting in healthcare-Regulatory frameworks, institutional governance, and economic implications with evidence from Poland.
- 1Department of Medical and Pharmaceutical Law, Department of Psychosocial Aspects of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
- 2College of Economics and Social Sciences, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Abstract
Adverse events constitute a major challenge not only for patient safety but also for the effectiveness, sustainability and equity of healthcare systems. The present analysis demonstrates that patient safety cannot be reduced to a purely clinical or legal issue, as adverse events generate substantial social and economic consequences that frequently extend beyond healthcare institutions and are borne by patients and their households. The findings indicate that the current Polish model of adverse event monitoring, based predominantly on internal reporting mechanisms within individual healthcare entities, provides limited opportunities for national learning, regulatory evaluation and evidence-based policy-making. The absence of a centralized adverse event register restricts the ability to assess the effectiveness of patient safety interventions, estimate the full social and economic burden of adverse events and identify systemic risk factors that require regulatory action. Effective reporting systems require an organizational culture based on trust, transparency and learning, supported by the principles of no-blame and just culture, which encourage incident reporting while maintaining accountability for reckless or intentional misconduct. Therefore, future reforms should focus on strengthening information infrastructure, improving data quality and comparability, and developing integrated national reporting systems that facilitate organizational learning and regulatory evaluation. The establishment of a central adverse event register, combined with transparent reporting mechanisms and systematic assessment of patient safety policies, could significantly improve both patient outcomes and the allocative efficiency of healthcare systems. Integrating legal and economic perspectives into patient safety governance is essential for designing regulations that adequately reflect the full social costs of adverse events and promote more resilient, equitable and patient-centered healthcare systems.
Related
- Explainable AI in Healthcare: A Holistic View of Technical Approaches, Regulatory Frameworks, Reliable Clinical Implementation Insights and Limitations.
- Quantifying Pharmaceutical Waste Burden and Management Costs: Implications for Healthcare Risk Management and Governance.
- Integrating game meat and bushmeat frameworks for sustainable wildlife meat governance in Zambia: A One Health approach
- Legal Frameworks, Institutional Barriers and Unmet Needs of Young University Students With Cancer in Italy: A Call to Action
- Integrated Institutional Transformation Theory (IITT): Toward an Institutional Theory for the Transformation of Primary Healthcare Centers Through the Tikena17 Conceptual Framework
BibTeX
@article{pacian2026adverse,
title = {{Adverse event reporting in healthcare-Regulatory frameworks, institutional governance, and economic implications with evidence from Poland.}},
author = {Jolanta Agnieszka Pacian and Marlena Jolanta Piekut},
journal = {Frontiers in public health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1891735},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903545},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Adverse event reporting in healthcare-Regulatory frameworks, institutional governance, and economic implications with evidence from Poland.
AU - Jolanta Agnieszka Pacian
AU - Marlena Jolanta Piekut
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/06
JO - Frontiers in public health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1891735
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903545
AB - Adverse events constitute a major challenge not only for patient safety but also for the effectiveness, sustainability and equity of healthcare systems. The present analysis demonstrates that patient safety cannot be reduced to a purely clinical or legal issue, as adverse events generate substantial social and economic consequences that frequently extend beyond healthcare institutions and are borne by patients and their households. The findings indicate that the current Polish model of adverse event monitoring, based predominantly on internal reporting mechanisms within individual healthcare entities, provides limited opportunities for national learning, regulatory evaluation and evidence-based policy-making. The absence of a centralized adverse event register restricts the ability to assess the effectiveness of patient safety interventions, estimate the full social and economic burden of adverse events and identify systemic risk factors that require regulatory action. Effective reporting systems require an organizational culture based on trust, transparency and learning, supported by the principles of no-blame and just culture, which encourage incident reporting while maintaining accountability for reckless or intentional misconduct. Therefore, future reforms should focus on strengthening information infrastructure, improving data quality and comparability, and developing integrated national reporting systems that facilitate organizational learning and regulatory evaluation. The establishment of a central adverse event register, combined with transparent reporting mechanisms and systematic assessment of patient safety policies, could significantly improve both patient outcomes and the allocative efficiency of healthcare systems. Integrating legal and economic perspectives into patient safety governance is essential for designing regulations that adequately reflect the full social costs of adverse events and promote more resilient, equitable and patient-centered healthcare systems.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -