Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Breed-dependent metabolic and growth responses to saturated and unsaturated fat supplements in fat-tailed and thin-tailed lambs

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the breed-specific effects of different dietary energy sources on performance, expression of energy metabolism-related genes, and metabolic parameters in fat tailed and thin tailed sheep. A 2 × 3 factorial arrangement (two breeds × three dietary treatments) was used. Thirty-six fat tailed (Taleshi breed) and 36 thin tailed lambs (zel breed) were assigned to three dietary treatments for 116 days ( n = 12 for each Breed*diet comparison): a control diet (no fat supplement), a diet containing 4% stearic acid-rich saturated fatty acid (SFA), and a diet containing 4% protected unsaturated fatty acids (US FAS ). A significant breed × diet interaction was found for average daily gain (ADG) ( P < 0.05 ). Fat-tailed lambs fed the SFA diet had the highest ADG (115.71 g/day), which was significantly greater ( P < 0.05) than thin-tailed lambs on the same diet (108.57 g/day) and fat-tailed lambs on USFA (107.14 g/day). Dry matter intake (DMI) was not significantly affected by breed × diet interaction. Gene expression analysis showed that protected USFA significantly upregulated ( P < 0.05) LPL and FAS genes in the tail fat of fat-tailed lambs. In thin-tailed lambs, protected USFA significantly increased ( P < 0.05) subcutaneous adipose tissue expression of GLUT4, TNF-α, and IGF-1 genes. Moreover, LPL and FAS were also upregulated in thin-tailed lambs fed protected USFA. A significant breed × energy source interaction was observed for ruminal butyric acid concentration and the acetate: propionate ratio ( P < 0.05). Metabolically, fat-tailed lambs demonstrated greater insulin sensitivity, particularly when fed SFA and protected USFA, as evidenced by a significantly lower area under the curve (AUC) in the insulin tolerance test ( P < 0.05), whereas thin-tailed lambs exhibited higher insulin resistance. Plasma glucose, triglycerides, and cholesterol were significantly influenced by breed × fat source interaction ( P < 0.05), with thin-tailed lambs on the SFA diet showing the highest values. Rumen parameters, including pH and protozoal count, were significantly affected by fat source ( P < 0.05) but not by breed. In conclusion, metabolic and performance responses to dietary energy sources are highly breed-dependent. Fat-tailed sheep are more efficient at utilizing SFA for growth, while protected USFA significantly modulates key metabolic genes in thin-tailed sheep. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring dietary energy strategies to the animal’s genetic background.

Related

  1. Metabolic control of NETosis: dunnione suppresses inflammatory responses through NQO1–dependent redox modulation
    Meng-Yu Zhu, Seung-Hoon Lee, Gi-Su Oh +3
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyCrossref
  2. Metabolic complexity and nutritional reductionism. Deconstructing the single active ingredient paradigm in protein and amino acid supplements.
    Giovanni Corsetti, Evasio Pasini
    Frontiers in nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCell biologyEurope PMC
  3. Host metabolic responses to SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses: parallels and contrasts
    Charles Terra, Olivier Terrier, Audrey Le Gouellec
    MetabolomicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyHAL
  4. Metabolic and transcriptional responses reveal co-option of symbiotic processes during early soybean-soybean cyst nematode interaction
    M. Rai, E. Miraeiz, M. Dutta +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPlant biologybioRxiv
  5. Astrocyte fatty acid uptake and ketogenesis in the mediobasal hypothalamus coordinate adaptive metabolic responses against high-fat diet exposure in male rodents
    K. Navarro i Batista, N. Ellersiek, P. Kulka +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{alipour2026breeddependent,
  title = {{Breed-dependent metabolic and growth responses to saturated and unsaturated fat supplements in fat-tailed and thin-tailed lambs}},
  author = {Hamed Alipour and Hamed Khalilvandi-Behroozyar and Rasoul Pirmohammadi and Behzad Asadnezhad and Ahmad Ghorbani},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-62401-w},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-62401-w},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Breed-dependent metabolic and growth responses to saturated and unsaturated fat supplements in fat-tailed and thin-tailed lambs
AU  - Hamed Alipour
AU  - Hamed Khalilvandi-Behroozyar
AU  - Rasoul Pirmohammadi
AU  - Behzad Asadnezhad
AU  - Ahmad Ghorbani
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-62401-w
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-62401-w
AB  - This study was conducted to investigate the breed-specific effects of different dietary energy sources on performance, expression of energy metabolism-related genes, and metabolic parameters in fat tailed and thin tailed sheep. A 2 × 3 factorial arrangement (two breeds × three dietary treatments) was used. Thirty-six fat tailed (Taleshi breed) and 36 thin tailed lambs (zel breed) were assigned to three dietary treatments for 116 days ( n = 12 for each Breed*diet comparison): a control diet (no fat supplement), a diet containing 4% stearic acid-rich saturated fatty acid (SFA), and a diet containing 4% protected unsaturated fatty acids (US FAS ). A significant breed × diet interaction was found for average daily gain (ADG) ( P < 0.05 ). Fat-tailed lambs fed the SFA diet had the highest ADG (115.71 g/day), which was significantly greater ( P < 0.05) than thin-tailed lambs on the same diet (108.57 g/day) and fat-tailed lambs on USFA (107.14 g/day). Dry matter intake (DMI) was not significantly affected by breed × diet interaction. Gene expression analysis showed that protected USFA significantly upregulated ( P < 0.05) LPL and FAS genes in the tail fat of fat-tailed lambs. In thin-tailed lambs, protected USFA significantly increased ( P < 0.05) subcutaneous adipose tissue expression of GLUT4, TNF-α, and IGF-1 genes. Moreover, LPL and FAS were also upregulated in thin-tailed lambs fed protected USFA. A significant breed × energy source interaction was observed for ruminal butyric acid concentration and the acetate: propionate ratio ( P < 0.05). Metabolically, fat-tailed lambs demonstrated greater insulin sensitivity, particularly when fed SFA and protected USFA, as evidenced by a significantly lower area under the curve (AUC) in the insulin tolerance test ( P < 0.05), whereas thin-tailed lambs exhibited higher insulin resistance. Plasma glucose, triglycerides, and cholesterol were significantly influenced by breed × fat source interaction ( P < 0.05), with thin-tailed lambs on the SFA diet showing the highest values. Rumen parameters, including pH and protozoal count, were significantly affected by fat source ( P < 0.05) but not by breed. In conclusion, metabolic and performance responses to dietary energy sources are highly breed-dependent. Fat-tailed sheep are more efficient at utilizing SFA for growth, while protected USFA significantly modulates key metabolic genes in thin-tailed sheep. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring dietary energy strategies to the animal’s genetic background.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -