Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Sustainability

Use of the Spatial Economic Benefit Analysis (SEBA) for Marine Spatial Planning: A Case Including Offshore Wind Energy and Fisheries in France

Abstract

Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) is a key instrument for sustainable ocean governance in Europe, yet the spatial distribution of socioeconomic benefits and trade-offs remains poorly documented. This study applies and extends the Spatial Economic Benefit Analysis (SEBA) framework to offshore wind energy and capture fisheries in France, with a focus on the North Atlantic–Western Channel (NAMO) façade. Three extensions are introduced relative to earlier single-sector, single-scale SEBA applications: simultaneous dual-sector comparison, nesting of project-level firm mapping within regional analysis, and delivery through an open, updatable visualization platform that allows planners to re-run the analysis as registries are updated. Twelve indicator families were selected against four explicit criteria (relevance to a SEBA step, spatial attributability, traceability to a planning instrument, and public availability) and cross-validated against independent registries. Offshore wind employment is more unevenly distributed across regions than fishery revenue (Gini 0.59 versus 0.42), and firm presence is a weak proxy for employment: Brittany hosts 26.6% of mapped offshore wind firms but only 6.5% of sectoral full-time equivalents (2.1 FTE per firm), whereas Île-de-France hosts 4.8% of firms and 19.6% of employment (34.6 FTE per firm). Fishery revenue and offshore wind firm counts are positively rank-correlated across coastal regions (Spearman ρ = 0.90, n = 5, p = 0.037), indicating co-location rather than causation: offshore wind constitutes an additional spatial pressure on a sector already contracting (−9.5% employment 2012–2022; −29% vessels 2000–2023). Uncertainty was addressed through a three-tier data confidence classification and sensitivity testing; concentration rankings were robust to extreme reassignments of multi-role firms (ΔGini ≤ 0.06). The analysis is deliberately restricted to the distribution of economic benefits and does not assess ecological impacts, which must be integrated before SEBA outputs inform zoning. Outputs are directly interpretable for façade plan revision, tender local content scoring, and compensation design, and the workflow is transferable to any jurisdiction with public corporate registries and landings statistics.

Related

  1. Evidence mapping of the causes and effects of habitat change attributed to offshore wind development is important for determining impacts on fisheries species
    Andrew B. Gill, Fiona Gilmour, Aaron T. Adamack +18
    ICES Journal of Marine SciencePeer-reviewedCC BYEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Sensitivity analysis of annual energy production and associated economic losses due to external wake effects on offshore wind clusters: A case study of the Shinan offshore wind cluster in southwest sea of Korea
    Geonhwa Ryu, Dohee Lee, Jungho Kim +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyFluid dynamicsPLOS
  3. Adaptive capacity of fishing companies facing spatial competition with offshore wind farms: insights from scallop fishers in Normandy (France)
    Hélène Buchholzer, Célya Martial, Marjolaine Frésard +1
    Ecology and SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  4. Dual-constraint spatial planning unlocks proactive blue carbon expansion across China's coastlines
    Yang Xu, Tianci Gu, Feng Xu +6
    Environmental science and ecotechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
  5. Combining nature conservation with maritime spatial planning in Northern Europe
    Riku Varjopuro, Annica M Brink, Kemal Pınarbaşı +1
    npj Ocean SustainabilityPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@article{pawar2026spatial,
  title = {{Use of the Spatial Economic Benefit Analysis (SEBA) for Marine Spatial Planning: A Case Including Offshore Wind Energy and Fisheries in France}},
  author = {Lokesh Pawar and Bertrand Le Gallic and Jorge Ramos},
  journal = {Sustainability},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.3390/su18168370},
  url = {https://univ-brest.hal.science/hal-05757570v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Use of the Spatial Economic Benefit Analysis (SEBA) for Marine Spatial Planning: A Case Including Offshore Wind Energy and Fisheries in France
AU  - Lokesh Pawar
AU  - Bertrand Le Gallic
AU  - Jorge Ramos
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/15
JO  - Sustainability
DO  - 10.3390/su18168370
UR  - https://univ-brest.hal.science/hal-05757570v1
AB  - Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) is a key instrument for sustainable ocean governance in Europe, yet the spatial distribution of socioeconomic benefits and trade-offs remains poorly documented. This study applies and extends the Spatial Economic Benefit Analysis (SEBA) framework to offshore wind energy and capture fisheries in France, with a focus on the North Atlantic–Western Channel (NAMO) façade. Three extensions are introduced relative to earlier single-sector, single-scale SEBA applications: simultaneous dual-sector comparison, nesting of project-level firm mapping within regional analysis, and delivery through an open, updatable visualization platform that allows planners to re-run the analysis as registries are updated. Twelve indicator families were selected against four explicit criteria (relevance to a SEBA step, spatial attributability, traceability to a planning instrument, and public availability) and cross-validated against independent registries. Offshore wind employment is more unevenly distributed across regions than fishery revenue (Gini 0.59 versus 0.42), and firm presence is a weak proxy for employment: Brittany hosts 26.6% of mapped offshore wind firms but only 6.5% of sectoral full-time equivalents (2.1 FTE per firm), whereas Île-de-France hosts 4.8% of firms and 19.6% of employment (34.6 FTE per firm). Fishery revenue and offshore wind firm counts are positively rank-correlated across coastal regions (Spearman ρ = 0.90, n = 5, p = 0.037), indicating co-location rather than causation: offshore wind constitutes an additional spatial pressure on a sector already contracting (−9.5% employment 2012–2022; −29% vessels 2000–2023). Uncertainty was addressed through a three-tier data confidence classification and sensitivity testing; concentration rankings were robust to extreme reassignments of multi-role firms (ΔGini ≤ 0.06). The analysis is deliberately restricted to the distribution of economic benefits and does not assess ecological impacts, which must be integrated before SEBA outputs inform zoning. Outputs are directly interpretable for façade plan revision, tender local content scoring, and compensation design, and the workflow is transferable to any jurisdiction with public corporate registries and landings statistics.
SN  - 2071-1050
ER  -