FEED your mind: The evolutionary roots of human food cognition
Abstract
Research on food cognition has largely overlooked that our modern food environment strongly differs from the environment in which our ancestors lived. When foraging for food in wild environments, our ancestors had to distinguish edible food resources from myriad inedible and potentially toxic entities. In contrast, in most cultures today, many decisions about food are made during a trip to the grocery store or a meal at a restaurant, where we might ask ourselves: Is this item healthy? but certainly not: Is this item edible or poisonous? Here we argue that the scope of the problem humans faced with respect to food included navigating through wild environments to Find candidate food items, Excluding the costs of making a mistake and consuming a harmful food item, Evaluating the nutritional benefits of the potential foods and Deciding which food items to include in their diet. We call this the FEED problem and argue that it provides an organizing framework for thinking about the wide array of cognitive processes involved in human food psychology. The FEED problem can also be used as a generative theory to produce new testable empirical predictions about what cognitive mechanisms drive our modern food behaviors and provides a roadmap for future research in the field of food cognition.
Related
- Evolutionary Theory Makes Predictions About Cognition Beyond Rational Optimization
- Heterospecific social behavior in primates: insights into the evolutionary roots of pet-keeping
- Whole-brain modeling of dynamic causal circuits in human cognition using amortized variational inference
- Dynamics and geometry of emotion and cognition: an interpretable model of individual human behavior
- Relaxed evolutionary constraints on mitochondrial electron-transfer-associated variants in human cancers
BibTeX
@misc{rioux2026feed,
title = {{FEED your mind: The evolutionary roots of human food cognition}},
author = {Camille Rioux and Raffaella I Rumiati and Annie Wertz and Carol Coricelli},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/kb3s7_v6},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/kb3s7_v6/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - FEED your mind: The evolutionary roots of human food cognition
AU - Camille Rioux
AU - Raffaella I Rumiati
AU - Annie Wertz
AU - Carol Coricelli
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/09
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/kb3s7_v6
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/kb3s7_v6/
AB - Research on food cognition has largely overlooked that our modern food environment strongly differs from the environment in which our ancestors lived. When foraging for food in wild environments, our ancestors had to distinguish edible food resources from myriad inedible and potentially toxic entities. In contrast, in most cultures today, many decisions about food are made during a trip to the grocery store or a meal at a restaurant, where we might ask ourselves: Is this item healthy? but certainly not: Is this item edible or poisonous? Here we argue that the scope of the problem humans faced with respect to food included navigating through wild environments to Find candidate food items, Excluding the costs of making a mistake and consuming a harmful food item, Evaluating the nutritional benefits of the potential foods and Deciding which food items to include in their diet. We call this the FEED problem and argue that it provides an organizing framework for thinking about the wide array of cognitive processes involved in human food psychology. The FEED problem can also be used as a generative theory to produce new testable empirical predictions about what cognitive mechanisms drive our modern food behaviors and provides a roadmap for future research in the field of food cognition.
ER -