Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Deep Phenotyping and Longitudinal

  1. 1Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Ingenieur pour l'Environnement (LaSIE) UMR-CNRS 7356 Universite of La Rochelle, France

Abstract

Objective. Myasthenia gravis clinical trials increasingly rely on the MG Activities of Daily Living total score to assess disease severity and treatment response. However, aggregate scores may obscure clinically meaningful changes in individual symptom domains. To determine whether item-level MG-Activities of Daily Living profiles identify distinct clinical phenotypes and whether longitudinal phenotype transitions reveal disease changes inadequately captured by aggregate scores. Methods. MG-Activities of Daily Living evaluations from seven clinical trials and observational studies (5,259 observations were analyzed using principal component analysis and K-medoids clustering with Cityblock distance. Longitudinal phenotype transitions were evaluated in the three longitudinal cohorts and compared with changes in total scores. Results. Despite low median MG-ADL scores (2.0-3.0), substantial intercohort symptom heterogeneity was observed. Clustering identified five phenotypes: mild ocular (23.7%), severe ocular-dominant (23.5%), bulbar-respiratory dominant (22.6%), severe generalized (16.0%), and proximal limb-axial weakness (14.3%). Longitudinal phenotype instability occurred in 38-49% of Explore participants, 47-49% of Promise participants, and 20-25% of MGTX participants. Importantly, clinically meaningful phenotype transitions, including shifts from ocular to bulbar predominance, frequently occurred with changes of only one point in total MG-ADL scores. Conversely, substantial total score fluctuations could occur without a change in phenotype. Interpretation. MG-ADL total scores incompletely characterize disease heterogeneity and longitudinal symptom evolution. Incorporating item-level phenotyping into clinical trials and routine care may improve interpretation of treatment response, identify clinically important deterioration overlooked by aggregate scores, and facilitate more precise assessment of disease trajectories.

Related

  1. Real-world clinical effectiveness and exploratory longitudinal immunological changes of Efgartigimod in myasthenia gravis: a retrospective study and a single-cell analysis in one patient
    Liting Tian, Lanxin Zhang, Jingnan Jin +10
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
  2. Commentary: Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence and future perspectives
    Ana Belén Fernández
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefPMC
  3. From Rescue Therapy to Mechanism-Based Sequencing in Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Narrative Review with an Illustrative Clinical Case
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Anesthetic Management of a Patient With Myasthenia Gravis Undergoing Thoracoscopic Thymectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Rufaidah Alchuban, Abdulrahman AlSulaiti, Khadija Abuhassan +1
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Perioperative local anesthetic and antibiotic considerations during Mohs micrographic surgery on a patient with myasthenia gravis
    Jin Nathan Swun, Ryan Dieringer, Adam M. Rotunda
    JAAD case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{garbey2026myasthenia,
  title = {{Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Deep Phenotyping and Longitudinal}},
  author = {M. Garbey and Q. Lesport and O. Haddad and C. Carpenter and H. Kaminski},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.26.26366495},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.26.26366495v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Deep Phenotyping and Longitudinal
AU  - M. Garbey
AU  - Q. Lesport
AU  - O. Haddad
AU  - C. Carpenter
AU  - H. Kaminski
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.26.26366495
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.26.26366495v1
AB  - Objective. Myasthenia gravis clinical trials increasingly rely on the MG Activities of Daily Living total score to assess disease severity and treatment response. However, aggregate scores may obscure clinically meaningful changes in individual symptom domains. To determine whether item-level MG-Activities of Daily Living profiles identify distinct clinical phenotypes and whether longitudinal phenotype transitions reveal disease changes inadequately captured by aggregate scores. Methods. MG-Activities of Daily Living evaluations from seven clinical trials and observational studies (5,259 observations were analyzed using principal component analysis and K-medoids clustering with Cityblock distance. Longitudinal phenotype transitions were evaluated in the three longitudinal cohorts and compared with changes in total scores. Results. Despite low median MG-ADL scores (2.0-3.0), substantial intercohort symptom heterogeneity was observed. Clustering identified five phenotypes: mild ocular (23.7%), severe ocular-dominant (23.5%), bulbar-respiratory dominant (22.6%), severe generalized (16.0%), and proximal limb-axial weakness (14.3%). Longitudinal phenotype instability occurred in 38-49% of Explore participants, 47-49% of Promise participants, and 20-25% of MGTX participants. Importantly, clinically meaningful phenotype transitions, including shifts from ocular to bulbar predominance, frequently occurred with changes of only one point in total MG-ADL scores. Conversely, substantial total score fluctuations could occur without a change in phenotype. Interpretation. MG-ADL total scores incompletely characterize disease heterogeneity and longitudinal symptom evolution. Incorporating item-level phenotyping into clinical trials and routine care may improve interpretation of treatment response, identify clinically important deterioration overlooked by aggregate scores, and facilitate more precise assessment of disease trajectories.
ER  -