Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Environmental Research Letters

Detecting acceleration in global mean temperature using supralinear trends

  1. 1Aalborg University
  2. 2Center for Research in Energy: Economics and Markets (CoRE)

Abstract

Whether global mean surface temperature has accelerated has received opposite answers in quick succession, reported as undetectable on data to 2023 and as significant on data to 2024. This raises two questions: since when is acceleration detectable, and how far does the answer depend on the test used? We show that structural-break tests, often used for this purpose, cannot reliably date the onset of a continuously accelerating warming rate. We therefore test for curvature directly, under specifications whose null is exactly a constant warming rate and whose alternative is curvature rather than a break. One is a linearithmic trend, which grows faster than linear but more slowly than any polynomial of degree greater than one; the other estimates the curvature freely from the data. We report alongside them the quadratic trend used in the recent literature. Over 1970–2025, in a single full-sample test, the linearithmic and quadratic coefficients are positive and statistically significant in all five major temperature datasets once El Niño and solar variability are controlled for. The onset of acceleration is dated by re-estimating over expanding windows and correcting for multiple testing. Under the linearithmic specification, acceleration first becomes detectable in windows ending in mid-2023 for NOAA, late 2023 for GISTEMP and mid-2024 for ERA5, and not yet in HadCRUT or Berkeley. The free-curvature specification agrees on direction but rejects in fewer datasets, since estimating the shape costs precision. The linearithmic specification implies the least curvature of the three, with an acceleration that declines over time, and so the lowest warming of the three when extended to 2050.

Versions

Related

  1. Robust warming rates, marginal evidence of acceleration and unstable extrapolation: a reproducible reanalysis of statistical trend models for the Berkeley Earth global temperature record
    Arav Siddharth Mestry
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyClimate scienceEarthArXiv
  2. Ocean circulation changes rather than global warming drove temperature trends across the Miocene Climatic Optimum
    Evi Wubben, Xiaoqing Liu, Tjerk J. T. Veenstra +7
    Science AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCAtmospheric science & meteorologyCrossref
  3. Editorial: Cropping systems adaptation in the context of global change: current trends and future directions
    Gianni Bellocchi, Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, Robert Mangani
    Frontiers in AgronomyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  4. Review article: using machine learning for snow remote sensing: trends and future directions for global snow measurements
    Catherine Marina Breen, Kehan Yang, Justin Pflug +4
    EGUspherePreprintCC BY 4.0General earth scienceEGUsphere
  5. A Land-Sea Contrast Pattern in Surface Temperature and Atmospheric Circulation Trends in Recent Decades
    Benjamin O. Johnson, Maria Rugenstein
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
BibTeX
@article{veravaldes2026detecting,
  title = {{Detecting acceleration in global mean temperature using supralinear trends}},
  author = {J Eduardo Vera-Valdés},
  journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/aeb55e},
  url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aeb55e},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Detecting acceleration in global mean temperature using supralinear trends
AU  - J Eduardo Vera-Valdés
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Environmental Research Letters
DO  - 10.1088/1748-9326/aeb55e
UR  - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aeb55e
AB  - Whether global mean surface temperature has accelerated has received opposite answers in quick succession, reported as undetectable on data to 2023 and as significant on data to 2024. This raises two questions: since when is acceleration detectable, and how far does the answer depend on the test used? We show that structural-break tests, often used for this purpose, cannot reliably date the onset of a continuously accelerating warming rate. We therefore test for curvature directly, under specifications whose null is exactly a constant warming rate and whose alternative is curvature rather than a break. One is a linearithmic trend, which grows faster than linear but more slowly than any polynomial of degree greater than one; the other estimates the curvature freely from the data. We report alongside them the quadratic trend used in the recent literature. Over 1970–2025, in a single full-sample test, the linearithmic and quadratic coefficients are positive and statistically significant in all five major temperature datasets once El Niño and solar variability are controlled for. The onset of acceleration is dated by re-estimating over expanding windows and correcting for multiple testing. Under the linearithmic specification, acceleration first becomes detectable in windows ending in mid-2023 for NOAA, late 2023 for GISTEMP and mid-2024 for ERA5, and not yet in HadCRUT or Berkeley. The free-curvature specification agrees on direction but rejects in fewer datasets, since estimating the shape costs precision. The linearithmic specification implies the least curvature of the three, with an acceleration that declines over time, and so the lowest warming of the three when extended to 2050.
SN  - 1748-9326
ER  -