Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCmedRxiv

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein profiles differ between Korean and US adults with LDL cholesterol below 100 mg/dL

Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) profiles in Korean and US adults with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) below 100 mg/dL and examine differences after adiposity adjustment.

Study designCross-sectional analysis of national health examination surveys.

MethodsWe analysed the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2022-2024 (n=5,785) and US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey August 2021-August 2023 (n=1,056). Eligible adults had Sampson-calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL and hsCRP [≤]10 mg/L; elevated hsCRP was defined as 2-10 mg/L. We estimated survey-weighted prevalence differences and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs).

ResultsLDL-C distributions closely overlapped (weighted medians, 79.7 vs 80.1 mg/dL), whereas median hsCRP was 0.50 vs 1.34 mg/L. Elevated-hsCRP prevalence was 12.2% in Korea and 35.7% in the United States (difference, 23.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 19.4-27.7); the age-sex-standardised difference was 23.4 percentage points. Among 6,235 common complete cases, the age-sex-adjusted US-versus-Korea PR was 2.86 (95% CI, 2.48-3.30), decreasing to 1.66 (1.40-1.98) after waist circumference adjustment and 1.92 (1.62-2.26) after body mass index adjustment.

ConclusionsSimilar LDL-C distributions coexisted with markedly different hsCRP profiles. Waist adjustment attenuated the between-country contrast more than BMI adjustment, supporting joint consideration of inflammatory, lipid and anthropometric measures in population surveillance.

Related

  1. Remnant cholesterol, C-reactive protein, cholesterol-lowering medication, and cardiovascular outcome: novel findings from UK Biobank.
    Jing Chen, Xuan Song, Jian-Jun Li +1
    Frontiers in nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  2. Impact of High-sensitivity C-reactive protein testing on statin use in primary prevention: A national multicenter analysis
    Danh Q. Nguyen, Anand Rohatgi, Amit Khera +5
    American journal of preventive cardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Association of the C-reactive protein-to-HDL cholesterol ratio with all-cause mortality in Chinese adults with impaired renal function: a prospective cohort study
    Yuan Wang, Fan Zhang, Liuyan Huang +2
    The Egyptian Journal of Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  4. High sensitivity-C-reactive protein variability and risk of cancer incidence: A longitudinal prospective cohort study cancer
    Guoshuai Xu, Renjia Cheng, Yiming Wang +4
    Experimental and Therapeutic MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
  5. Association Between the Korean Healthy Eating Index and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein: A Nationally Representative Study in South Korea, 2022–2024
    Seong-Uk Baek, Jin-Ha Yoon
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{teng2026highsensitivity,
  title = {{High-sensitivity C-reactive protein profiles differ between Korean and US adults with LDL cholesterol below 100 mg/dL}},
  author = {J. TENG and J. XIA},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.14.26365531},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.14.26365531v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - High-sensitivity C-reactive protein profiles differ between Korean and US adults with LDL cholesterol below 100 mg/dL
AU  - J. TENG
AU  - J. XIA
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.14.26365531
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.14.26365531v1
AB  - ObjectivesTo compare high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) profiles in Korean and US adults with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) below 100 mg/dL and examine differences after adiposity adjustment.  Study designCross-sectional analysis of national health examination surveys.  MethodsWe analysed the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2022-2024 (n=5,785) and US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey August 2021-August 2023 (n=1,056). Eligible adults had Sampson-calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL and hsCRP [≤]10 mg/L; elevated hsCRP was defined as 2-10 mg/L. We estimated survey-weighted prevalence differences and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs).  ResultsLDL-C distributions closely overlapped (weighted medians, 79.7 vs 80.1 mg/dL), whereas median hsCRP was 0.50 vs 1.34 mg/L. Elevated-hsCRP prevalence was 12.2% in Korea and 35.7% in the United States (difference, 23.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 19.4-27.7); the age-sex-standardised difference was 23.4 percentage points. Among 6,235 common complete cases, the age-sex-adjusted US-versus-Korea PR was 2.86 (95% CI, 2.48-3.30), decreasing to 1.66 (1.40-1.98) after waist circumference adjustment and 1.92 (1.62-2.26) after body mass index adjustment.  ConclusionsSimilar LDL-C distributions coexisted with markedly different hsCRP profiles. Waist adjustment attenuated the between-country contrast more than BMI adjustment, supporting joint consideration of inflammatory, lipid and anthropometric measures in population surveillance.
ER  -