Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Essential work, unequal places: Neighborhood characteristics of the essential workforce in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic

  1. 1University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center, Social Environment and Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America

Abstract

Introduction: At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 55 million U.S. workers continued providing “essential” services crucial to public health, safety, and economic stability, even as large segments of the workforce sheltered at home. Despite the central role these workers played in safeguarding the economy and the greater American public, little is known about the neighborhood environments in which essential workers lived and how well these communities were equipped to support the health and well-being of essential workers during the pandemic. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to describe the social and physical characteristics of U.S. neighborhoods with varying concentrations of essential workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We linked data from the National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA) with American Community Survey (ACS) 2016–2020 estimates to identify the residential concentration of essential workers across U.S. census tracts. Neighborhoods were categorized into quintiles based on the proportion of essential workers. We examined access to key neighborhood resources relevant to pandemic resilience, including food outlets, health care facilities, and parks/green space. We summarized characteristics using descriptive statistics and heatmaps. Differences between the highest (Q5) and lowest (Q1) quintiles were assessed using Welch’s two-sample t-tests. Results: Neighborhoods with higher concentrations of essential workers had greater access to grocery stores but significantly less access to health care facilities and parks/green space compared with neighborhoods with fewer essential workers. These disparities highlight uneven community support for those workers required to continue in-person work during a national public health emergency. Conclusion: Using nationwide neighborhood and census-tract data, we found that neighborhoods with a high proportion of essential workers generally had better access to food stores but substantially lower access to health care and parks/green space. Recognizing these uneven community conditions is critical for strengthening preparedness efforts and ensuring that neighborhoods are better equipped to support the essential workforce during future disasters and public health crises.

Related

  1. Neighborhood Disadvantage and Unequal Detection of Atrial Fibrillation
    Kamala P. Tamirisa, Larry R. Jackson
    JAMA Network OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cardiovascular medicineCrossref
  2. Establishment of a One Health workforce for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response
    Ong-orn Prasarnphanich, Carla Berger, Philip AbdelMalik +18
    Bulletin of the World Health OrganizationPeer-reviewedCC BY 3.0-IGOFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  3. Association between hypertension prevalence and neighborhood characteristics in Japan using combined claims data and geographic information systems: a neighborhood correlation study from LIFE Study
    Kan Oishi, Rei Ono, Kojiro Ishii +5
    Environmental Health and Preventive MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineJ-STAGE
  4. Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS) Pandemic Workforce Administrative Cohort (IMPACT): design and descriptive estimates of surveillance-detected COVID-19 outcomes and primary-series vaccination coverage.
    Edgar Ortiz-Brizuela, Mireille E Schnitzer, Denis Talbot +4
    BMJ public healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMCPMC
  5. Assessing Pandemic Response Implementation and the Workforce Impact Among Nurses and Midwives Internationally: Protocol for an Exploratory, Pragmatic, Online Descriptive Study
    Allison Squires, Hillary J Dutton, Amal Mobarki +2
    JMIR Research ProtocolsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{duchowny2026essential,
  title = {{Essential work, unequal places: Neighborhood characteristics of the essential workforce in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic}},
  author = {Kate Duchowny and Vicky Wang and Grace Noppert and Robert Melendez and Lindsay Gypin and Philippa Clarke},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0357792},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357792},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Essential work, unequal places: Neighborhood characteristics of the essential workforce in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic
AU  - Kate Duchowny
AU  - Vicky Wang
AU  - Grace Noppert
AU  - Robert Melendez
AU  - Lindsay Gypin
AU  - Philippa Clarke
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0357792
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357792
AB  - Introduction: At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 55 million U.S. workers continued providing “essential” services crucial to public health, safety, and economic stability, even as large segments of the workforce sheltered at home. Despite the central role these workers played in safeguarding the economy and the greater American public, little is known about the neighborhood environments in which essential workers lived and how well these communities were equipped to support the health and well-being of essential workers during the pandemic. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to describe the social and physical characteristics of U.S. neighborhoods with varying concentrations of essential workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We linked data from the National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA) with American Community Survey (ACS) 2016–2020 estimates to identify the residential concentration of essential workers across U.S. census tracts. Neighborhoods were categorized into quintiles based on the proportion of essential workers. We examined access to key neighborhood resources relevant to pandemic resilience, including food outlets, health care facilities, and parks/green space. We summarized characteristics using descriptive statistics and heatmaps. Differences between the highest (Q5) and lowest (Q1) quintiles were assessed using Welch’s two-sample t-tests. Results: Neighborhoods with higher concentrations of essential workers had greater access to grocery stores but significantly less access to health care facilities and parks/green space compared with neighborhoods with fewer essential workers. These disparities highlight uneven community support for those workers required to continue in-person work during a national public health emergency. Conclusion: Using nationwide neighborhood and census-tract data, we found that neighborhoods with a high proportion of essential workers generally had better access to food stores but substantially lower access to health care and parks/green space. Recognizing these uneven community conditions is critical for strengthening preparedness efforts and ensuring that neighborhoods are better equipped to support the essential workforce during future disasters and public health crises.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -