Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine

Ethnobotanical study on wild edible plants in The Kuancheng Traditional Chestnut Eco-Planting System, a globally important agricultural heritage system in Hebei, China.

8 affiliations
  1. 1Key Laboratory of Ecology and Environment in Minority Areas, Minzu University of China), National Ethnic Affairs Commission of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
  2. 2College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
  3. 3School of Ethnology and Sociology, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
  4. 4Agricultural and Rural Bureau of Kuancheng Manchu Autonomous County, 067600, Hebei, China.
  5. 5Key Laboratory of Ecology and Environment in Minority Areas, Minzu University of China), National Ethnic Affairs Commission of China, Beijing, 100081, China. [email protected].
  6. 6College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China. [email protected].
  7. 7Key Laboratory of Ethnomedicine, Minzu University of China), Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, 100081, China. [email protected].
  8. 8Institute of National Security Studies, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China. [email protected].

Abstract

Background

Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) are living agroecosystems shaped by the coevolution of traditional knowledge (TK) and agrobiodiversity. As a core GIAHS criterion, agrobiodiversity should be assessed beyond crops and livestock to include wild resources that communities regularly use and manage. Wild edible plants (WEPs) and associated TK that guide their identification, harvesting, processing, and habitat care are therefore a key but poorly documented part of agrobiodiversity in the mountainous regions of northern China. The Kuancheng Traditional Chestnut Eco-Planting System (KTCES) in Hebei Province, northern China, is a chestnut-based GIAHS with great diversity and value of WEPs. Along with the rapid economic development and fast reduction of TK, it is necessary to document WEPs and associated TK in KTCES, both to contribute to the conservation of agrobiodiversity and to provide a reference for the sustainable development of GIAHS.Methods

From February 2024 to July 2025, ethnobotanical surveys were conducted in six townships of Kuancheng Manchu Autonomous County, Hebei, China. The investigation methods include free listings, semi-structured interviews, key informant interviews and participatory observations. A total of 124 respondents were interviewed. Information was collected on the edible parts, categories, consumption methods, and multiple uses of WEPs. The cultural significance of these plants was assessed by calculating the relative frequency of citation (RFC) and the cultural food significance index (CFSI).Results

A total of 87 species of WEPs belonging to 37 families and encompassing various categories, such as wild vegetables (67), wild fruits (16), spices (10) and nuts (3), were documented in this study. The primary parts utilized include tender leaves, fruits, roots, seeds, and flowers, with harvesting predominantly taking place in spring and summer. The most frequently used families were Asteraceae (20), Rosaceae (9), Fabaceae (6) and Amaranthaceae (5). On the basis of the CFSI and RFC values, 30 species were identified as the most significant in local dietary culture, including Gypsophila oldhamiana, Leptopus chinensis, Indigofera kirilowii and Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa and so on.Conclusion

KTCES possesses abundant WEPs resources, and local residents possess a wealth of TK related to WEPs utilization. The diverse ways in which WEPs are used form the foundation for regional ecological adaptation and cultural identity. High-value WEPs have driven local economic development, ecological protection, and cultural innovation. It is necessary to investigate, document, and preserve WEPs and associated TK in GIAHS, as they hold particular significance for the conservation of agrobiodiversity and GIAHS.

Related

  1. Traditional Medicinal Plant Knowledge in the Guba District of Azerbaijan: An Ethnobotanical Study
    Javanshir Isayev, Sabina Aliyeva, Elmir Shabayev +4
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  2. Combined effects of chitosan and chestnut shell on microbial safety and quality of pork meat matter as potassium sorbate alternatives.
    Rina Yu, Yejin Kim, Prabhathma Yasasavi Rathnayake +3
    Journal of animal science and technologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textZoology & animal behaviourEurope PMC
  3. Repeat-Rich Architecture and Gene Duplication Characterize the Expanded Genome of the Chestnut Gall Wasp.
    Ye-Song Ren, An-Kang Lv, Yang Zeng +1
    InsectsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  4. Ethnobotanical and Phytochemical Properties of Alchornea cordifolia ((Schumach. & Thonn.) Müll. Arg.) and Morinda lucida (Benth.) in the Treatment of Insomnia in Sprague - Dwaley Rats
    Nwajuaku Ebele, A. A. Adedotun, Mutiat Bolanle Ibrahim +3
    Tropical Journal of Natural Product ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND10 citedPlant biologyOpenAlex
  5. Quantitative ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by Mullu Kuruma community of Wayanad, the Southern Western Ghats, India.
    Sangeeth Thekkan, Rajesh Raju
    Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPlant biologyEurope PMCDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{li2026ethnobotanical,
  title = {{Ethnobotanical study on wild edible plants in The Kuancheng Traditional Chestnut Eco-Planting System, a globally important agricultural heritage system in Hebei, China.}},
  author = {Shuai Li and Qing Zhang and Yan Li and Xinxin Wu and Jingyong Wang and Chunlin Long},
  journal = {Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s13002-026-00935-z},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897646},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Ethnobotanical study on wild edible plants in The Kuancheng Traditional Chestnut Eco-Planting System, a globally important agricultural heritage system in Hebei, China.
AU  - Shuai Li
AU  - Qing Zhang
AU  - Yan Li
AU  - Xinxin Wu
AU  - Jingyong Wang
AU  - Chunlin Long
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine
DO  - 10.1186/s13002-026-00935-z
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897646
AB  - Background  Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) are living agroecosystems shaped by the coevolution of traditional knowledge (TK) and agrobiodiversity. As a core GIAHS criterion, agrobiodiversity should be assessed beyond crops and livestock to include wild resources that communities regularly use and manage. Wild edible plants (WEPs) and associated TK that guide their identification, harvesting, processing, and habitat care are therefore a key but poorly documented part of agrobiodiversity in the mountainous regions of northern China. The Kuancheng Traditional Chestnut Eco-Planting System (KTCES) in Hebei Province, northern China, is a chestnut-based GIAHS with great diversity and value of WEPs. Along with the rapid economic development and fast reduction of TK, it is necessary to document WEPs and associated TK in KTCES, both to contribute to the conservation of agrobiodiversity and to provide a reference for the sustainable development of GIAHS.Methods  From February 2024 to July 2025, ethnobotanical surveys were conducted in six townships of Kuancheng Manchu Autonomous County, Hebei, China. The investigation methods include free listings, semi-structured interviews, key informant interviews and participatory observations. A total of 124 respondents were interviewed. Information was collected on the edible parts, categories, consumption methods, and multiple uses of WEPs. The cultural significance of these plants was assessed by calculating the relative frequency of citation (RFC) and the cultural food significance index (CFSI).Results  A total of 87 species of WEPs belonging to 37 families and encompassing various categories, such as wild vegetables (67), wild fruits (16), spices (10) and nuts (3), were documented in this study. The primary parts utilized include tender leaves, fruits, roots, seeds, and flowers, with harvesting predominantly taking place in spring and summer. The most frequently used families were Asteraceae (20), Rosaceae (9), Fabaceae (6) and Amaranthaceae (5). On the basis of the CFSI and RFC values, 30 species were identified as the most significant in local dietary culture, including Gypsophila oldhamiana, Leptopus chinensis, Indigofera kirilowii and Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa and so on.Conclusion  KTCES possesses abundant WEPs resources, and local residents possess a wealth of TK related to WEPs utilization. The diverse ways in which WEPs are used form the foundation for regional ecological adaptation and cultural identity. High-value WEPs have driven local economic development, ecological protection, and cultural innovation. It is necessary to investigate, document, and preserve WEPs and associated TK in GIAHS, as they hold particular significance for the conservation of agrobiodiversity and GIAHS.
SN  - 1746-4269
ER  -