Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Bottlenecks in Hamiltonian-Adaptive Resolution Simulation Method for Modeling Interfaces

Abstract

The Hamiltonian-Adaptive Resolution Simulation (H-AdResS) method allows to combine atomistic and particle-based coarse-grained models in a single simulation box, which makes it very attractive to model systems containing interfaces or reactive regions surrounded by an interacting environment. In our previous work [J. Chem. Inf. Model. (2026) 66 (15): 9215-9225], we implemented H-AdResS in LAMMPS (2 Aug 2023 version) and extended its use to interfaces, focusing on MOF/CO2 interfaces as an example. We found that, despite its advantages, using this method properly for this kind of systems is not trivial. In this work, an in-depth analysis of the impact of the choice of thermostatting schemes and long-range electrostatics models is presented. Even though its Hamiltonian formulation enables performing H-AdResS simulations within constant temperatures ensembles, not every thermostat is appropriate. We demonstrate that Langevin thermostat is a reliable choice for this method, while Nosé-Hoover results in artifacts. In addition, we show that using short-range models such as the Damped Shifted Force method for electrostatics, a popular choice for H-AdResS simulations, can lead to non-physical results when modeling interfaces. The need of capping strategies to deal with discontinuities in forces and energies arising from abrupt changes in resolution is also discussed. Finally, the impossibility of changing the definition of the H-AdResS Hamiltonian to include a gradual interpolation of the bonded degrees of freedom is discussed. We hope that this contribution helps the reader to appropriately set up H-AdResS simulations and to assess if this method can be used to accurately model their system of interest.

Related

  1. High-order Magnus expansion for Hamiltonian simulation
    Di Fang, Diyi Liu, Shuchen Zhu
    npj Quantum InformationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationCrossref
  2. Optimal Linear Combination of Hamiltonian Simulation for Dissipative Dynamics
    Hongkang Ni, Lexing Ying
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Probabilistic Simulation of Gas-Liquid Interfaces with Coupled Flow Matching on Spherical Harmonics
    Kiet Bennema ten Brinke, Rachna Ramesh, Douwe Orij +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textFluid dynamicsarXiv
  4. Efficient Quantum Simulation of Linearized Vlasov--Poisson Dynamics Using Trotter and THRIFT Hamiltonian Simulation Methods
    Kartick Paul, Rahul V, S. Aravinda +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textComputational physicsPlasma physicsarXiv
  5. Observable-targeted variational quantum simulation of Hamiltonian dynamics
    Leonardo Zambrano, Luciano Pereira, Antonio Acín
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{sudhakar2026bottlenecks,
  title = {{Bottlenecks in Hamiltonian-Adaptive Resolution Simulation Method for Modeling Interfaces}},
  author = {Hari Haran Sudhakar and Alessandra Serva and Rocio Semino},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.02415},
  eprint = {2607.02415},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02415},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Bottlenecks in Hamiltonian-Adaptive Resolution Simulation Method for Modeling Interfaces
AU  - Hari Haran Sudhakar
AU  - Alessandra Serva
AU  - Rocio Semino
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.02415
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02415
AB  - The Hamiltonian-Adaptive Resolution Simulation (H-AdResS) method allows to combine atomistic and particle-based coarse-grained models in a single simulation box, which makes it very attractive to model systems containing interfaces or reactive regions surrounded by an interacting environment. In our previous work [J. Chem. Inf. Model. (2026) 66 (15): 9215-9225], we implemented H-AdResS in LAMMPS (2 Aug 2023 version) and extended its use to interfaces, focusing on MOF/CO_2 interfaces as an example. We found that, despite its advantages, using this method properly for this kind of systems is not trivial. In this work, an in-depth analysis of the impact of the choice of thermostatting schemes and long-range electrostatics models is presented. Even though its Hamiltonian formulation enables performing H-AdResS simulations within constant temperatures ensembles, not every thermostat is appropriate. We demonstrate that Langevin thermostat is a reliable choice for this method, while Nosé-Hoover results in artifacts. In addition, we show that using short-range models such as the Damped Shifted Force method for electrostatics, a popular choice for H-AdResS simulations, can lead to non-physical results when modeling interfaces. The need of capping strategies to deal with discontinuities in forces and energies arising from abrupt changes in resolution is also discussed. Finally, the impossibility of changing the definition of the H-AdResS Hamiltonian to include a gradual interpolation of the bonded degrees of freedom is discussed. We hope that this contribution helps the reader to appropriately set up H-AdResS simulations and to assess if this method can be used to accurately model their system of interest.
ER  -