Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Tracing model-generated DNA with position-independent watermarking

Abstract

Genomic language models can write synthetic DNA that carries no record of its origin. A generation-time watermark could provide a provenance signal, if a verifier can detect it using only the DNA sequence, a key, and published detector settings, without knowing where the generated region starts, which strand it lies on, or how it was divided into six-base tokens. We embed the SynthID tournament watermark in two genomic language models, Carbon and GENERator-v2. The verifier searches both strands, every start position, and four window lengths, and corrects its decision for the whole search. In a detection cohort of 1,544 held-out prompts, it found all 3,088 marked sequences per model, unedited and after one substituted, inserted, or deleted base. For ordinary sequences, the one-sided 95% upper confidence bound on the false-positive rate was at most 0.850%; one bound for the wrong-key control reached 1.015% (Carbon, after a deletion). In a development cohort, neither model showed a detectable change in likelihood or in predefined sequence measures. Under random edits placed without reference to the detector, detection stayed complete or nearly complete up to a 2% per-base edit rate. These results show statistical detection, not biological function, secret-key security, or robustness to an editor who sees the detector.

Related

  1. Effective macrophage clearance of Klebsiella pneumoniae requires the inducible nitric oxide synthase iNOS and is independent of reactive oxygen species generated by NADPH oxidase
    A. E. Wilcox, E. H. Madigan, C. J. Andres +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textImmunologybioRxiv
  2. Tracing the Evolutionary Histories of Human Cholinergic Proteins Across Eukaryotes: A Comparative Phylogenomic Study
    A. Thakur, M. Kulharia
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  3. Tracing the origin of non-brittle rachis TtBTR1 alleles in wheat
    Emile Cavalet-Giorsa, Thomas Wicker, Simon G. Krattinger
    Communications BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General biologyNatureCrossref
  4. A Cre-responsive reporter quail for flexible genetic lineage tracing
    S. Z. Tan, H. C. Barzilai-Tutsch, H. Sun +4
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textDevelopmental biologybioRxiv
  5. Tracing the dynamic recruitment trajectory of Optineurin between the centrosome and other macromolecular assemblies, signifying its role in cell cycle progression
    A. Chakraborty, K. Kundu, D. Weil +1
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textCell biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{provatas12026tracing,
  title = {{Tracing model-generated DNA with position-independent watermarking}},
  author = {Kimon Antonios Provatas1 and Christos Galanopoulos and Ilias Georgakopoulos-Soares},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.04763},
  eprint = {2610.04763},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04763},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Tracing model-generated DNA with position-independent watermarking
AU  - Kimon Antonios Provatas1
AU  - Christos Galanopoulos
AU  - Ilias Georgakopoulos-Soares
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.04763
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04763
AB  - Genomic language models can write synthetic DNA that carries no record of its origin. A generation-time watermark could provide a provenance signal, if a verifier can detect it using only the DNA sequence, a key, and published detector settings, without knowing where the generated region starts, which strand it lies on, or how it was divided into six-base tokens. We embed the SynthID tournament watermark in two genomic language models, Carbon and GENERator-v2. The verifier searches both strands, every start position, and four window lengths, and corrects its decision for the whole search. In a detection cohort of 1,544 held-out prompts, it found all 3,088 marked sequences per model, unedited and after one substituted, inserted, or deleted base. For ordinary sequences, the one-sided 95% upper confidence bound on the false-positive rate was at most 0.850%; one bound for the wrong-key control reached 1.015% (Carbon, after a deletion). In a development cohort, neither model showed a detectable change in likelihood or in predefined sequence measures. Under random edits placed without reference to the detector, detection stayed complete or nearly complete up to a 2% per-base edit rate. These results show statistical detection, not biological function, secret-key security, or robustness to an editor who sees the detector.
ER  -