Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Public Health

Associations of dietary magnesium and omega-3 fatty acid intake with mental health indicators among Korean adults: a population-based cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background: Dietary magnesium and omega-3 fatty acid intake have been studied in relation to mental health, with findings varying across populations and exposure measures. We examined separate and joint associations of food-derived intake with elevated depressive symptoms, elevated anxiety symptoms, and suicidal ideation among Korean adults.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 4,411 adults aged ≥ 19 years from the 2022 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutrient intake was assessed by a single 24-hour recall; separately surveyed supplement quantities were not added. High magnesium intake was defined as ≥ 350 mg/day in men and ≥ 250 mg/day in women, and high omega-3 intake as ≥ 1.5 g/day. Elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms were defined as Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scores ≥ 10, respectively. Suicidal ideation referred to the previous 12 months. Survey-weighted logistic regression incorporated strata, clusters, integrated health–nutrition weights, and 13 covariates. Multiplicative nutrient interaction and exploratory symptom-score trends across intake quartiles were evaluated.

Results: The adjusted association between high omega-3 intake and elevated depressive symptoms was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] 0.833, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.556–1.249; p = 0.375). Adjusted associations with elevated anxiety symptoms (OR 0.929, 95% CI 0.631–1.367; p = 0.705) and suicidal ideation (OR 0.822, 95% CI 0.557–1.215; p = 0.324) were also not statistically significant. All 12 primary adjusted tests, including magnesium, joint intake, and nutrient interaction, had p > 0.05. The exploratory omega-3–PHQ-9 trend had nominal p = 0.026 and an approximate Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p = 0.104 across four trend tests.

Conclusions: Adjusted associations between the examined intake categories and mental health indicators were not statistically significant. Imprecise estimates and a single-day dietary assessment leave the relationships with usual intake uncertain. Prospective studies with repeated dietary measurements could help clarify the direction and magnitude of these associations.

Related

  1. Breakfast Dietary Patterns and Their Associations with Metabolic Indicators and NAFLD Severity: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Iranian Adults.
    Mehrdad Kianmehr, Maryam Rafraf, Alireza Hosseini +2
    Health promotion perspectivesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  2. Latent profiles of nutrition literacy among patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and their associations with dietary adherence and nutritional and metabolic indicators: a multicenter cross-sectional study
    Yanjing Chen, Shiyu Zhang, Caihua Ye +2
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  3. Central Adiposity Indicators, Cardiometabolic Markers and Dietary Quality Among Educational Workers in Southern Ecuador: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Verónica Cárdenas-Mazón, Rosario Suárez, Freddy Lining Aveiga-Ligua +7
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Associations of Body-Size and Estimated Body-Composition Indicators with Body-Shape Concerns and Eating Disorder-Related Traits in Adolescents: A School-Based Cross-Sectional Study
    Dolores Escrivá, Esther Moreno-Latorre, Inmaculada Benet +1
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Associations Between Psychological Factors, Routine Hematological and Biochemical Indicators, and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Among University Students: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.
    Jing Lv, Yue Du, Yue Han +11
    Psychology research and behavior managementPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{lee2026associations,
  title = {{Associations of dietary magnesium and omega-3 fatty acid intake with mental health indicators among Korean adults: a population-based cross-sectional study}},
  author = {Hyoju Lee and Miyoung Choi},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-29827-3},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12889-026-29827-3},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Associations of dietary magnesium and omega-3 fatty acid intake with mental health indicators among Korean adults: a population-based cross-sectional study
AU  - Hyoju Lee
AU  - Miyoung Choi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-29827-3
UR  - https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12889-026-29827-3
AB  - Background: Dietary magnesium and omega-3 fatty acid intake have been studied in relation to mental health, with findings varying across populations and exposure measures. We examined separate and joint associations of food-derived intake with elevated depressive symptoms, elevated anxiety symptoms, and suicidal ideation among Korean adults.  Methods: This cross-sectional study included 4,411 adults aged ≥ 19 years from the 2022 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutrient intake was assessed by a single 24-hour recall; separately surveyed supplement quantities were not added. High magnesium intake was defined as ≥ 350 mg/day in men and ≥ 250 mg/day in women, and high omega-3 intake as ≥ 1.5 g/day. Elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms were defined as Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scores ≥ 10, respectively. Suicidal ideation referred to the previous 12 months. Survey-weighted logistic regression incorporated strata, clusters, integrated health–nutrition weights, and 13 covariates. Multiplicative nutrient interaction and exploratory symptom-score trends across intake quartiles were evaluated.  Results: The adjusted association between high omega-3 intake and elevated depressive symptoms was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] 0.833, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.556–1.249; p = 0.375). Adjusted associations with elevated anxiety symptoms (OR 0.929, 95% CI 0.631–1.367; p = 0.705) and suicidal ideation (OR 0.822, 95% CI 0.557–1.215; p = 0.324) were also not statistically significant. All 12 primary adjusted tests, including magnesium, joint intake, and nutrient interaction, had p > 0.05. The exploratory omega-3–PHQ-9 trend had nominal p = 0.026 and an approximate Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p = 0.104 across four trend tests.  Conclusions: Adjusted associations between the examined intake categories and mental health indicators were not statistically significant. Imprecise estimates and a single-day dietary assessment leave the relationships with usual intake uncertain. Prospective studies with repeated dietary measurements could help clarify the direction and magnitude of these associations.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -