Standardized Exam of the Abdomen Protocol Through Telemedicine in the Emergency Department.
7 affiliations
- 1American University of Beirut, Department of Emergency Medicine, Beirut, Lebanon.
- 2American University of Beirut, Faculty of Medicine, Beirut, Lebanon.
- 3Children's Health Ireland at Temple Street, Dublin, Ireland.
- 4American University of Beirut, Clinical Research Institute, Beirut, Lebanon.
- 5Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- 6University of Balamand, Faculty of Medicine, Koura, Lebanon.
- 7Qatar University, QU Health Sector, Tamayuz Simulation Center, Doha, Qatar.
Abstract
Introduction
Abdominal pain is a common emergency department (ED) presentation, and virtual assessment of such complaints remains a challenge due to the limitations of remote physical examination. The standardized exam of the abdomen protocol (SEAP) was developed to guide patients in performing a self-abdominal examination during telemedicine consultations. We aimed to evaluate agreement between patient-performed abdominal self-examinations using the SEAP and physician-performed abdominal examinations.Methods
We conducted a prospective, single-center study at the American University of Beirut Medical Center ED in Lebanon from August 2023-August 2024. Adult patients who presented with abdominal pain and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Each patient performed a video-guided abdominal self-examination by following a brief instructional video (SEAP). The SEAP was developed by an emergency medicine faculty at our institution using pre-established abdominal examination principles and clinical practice frameworks. The protocol was translated into a structured, two-minute instructional video. Blinded abdominal examinations were then performed by an emergency medicine resident and an attending physician. The primary outcome was agreement in abdominal tenderness across seven predefined regions, assessed using the Cohen kappa coefficient. Patient experience and feasibility measures were also collected.Results
We included a total of 103 patients. Agreement between patient-performed and physician-performed examinations was slight to fair across six of the seven abdominal regions (κ range, .13-.41). The highest agreement was observed in the right lower quadrant, with fair agreement between patients and residents (κ = .47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.64) and patients and attending physicians (κ = .36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.53). Agreement in the remaining regions, including the upper quadrants and flanks, remained low; right upper quadrant (κ = .13), left upper quadrant (κ = .28), and flanks (κ range, -0.04 to .41). Most patients (97.9%; n = 94/96) rated the instructional video as clear and easy to follow.Conclusion
Patient-performed abdominal self-examination using the SEAP demonstrated limited agreement with physician examinations across most abdominal regions. Agreement in the right lower quadrant was also fair. These findings indicate that patient-performed abdominal self-examination does not reliably reproduce physician assessment. However, they provide a foundation for further studies aimed at refining and better defining the role of patient-guided abdominal examinations in telemedicine settings.
Related
- Assessing community-acquired acute infection in an irish emergency department: A retrospective observational study protocol
- A Portable Multi-Stream Telemedicine System for First-Level Emergency Support in Crisis Environments
- Automated Calculation of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Intra-Abdominal Injury Rule from Unstructured Emergency Department Notes Using a Large Language Model
- Emergency Department Management of Ankle Fractures: A Narrative Review
- Antipsychotic-Induced Parkinsonism With Concurrent Benztropine-Associated Anticholinergic Effects in a Community Emergency Department Setting: A Case Report
BibTeX
@article{abdulnabi2026standardized,
title = {{Standardized Exam of the Abdomen Protocol Through Telemedicine in the Emergency Department.}},
author = {Sarah S Abdul-Nabi and Souraya Arabi and Hind Anan and Rasha D Sawaya and Ahmad Zaghal and Hani Tamim and Jean-Marie Al Semaani and Zahi Hamdan and Maha Makki and Moustafa Al-Hariri and Afif Jean Mufarrij},
journal = {The western journal of emergency medicine},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.5811/westjem.62235},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900945},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Standardized Exam of the Abdomen Protocol Through Telemedicine in the Emergency Department.
AU - Sarah S Abdul-Nabi
AU - Souraya Arabi
AU - Hind Anan
AU - Rasha D Sawaya
AU - Ahmad Zaghal
AU - Hani Tamim
AU - Jean-Marie Al Semaani
AU - Zahi Hamdan
AU - Maha Makki
AU - Moustafa Al-Hariri
AU - Afif Jean Mufarrij
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/24
JO - The western journal of emergency medicine
DO - 10.5811/westjem.62235
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900945
AB - Introduction Abdominal pain is a common emergency department (ED) presentation, and virtual assessment of such complaints remains a challenge due to the limitations of remote physical examination. The standardized exam of the abdomen protocol (SEAP) was developed to guide patients in performing a self-abdominal examination during telemedicine consultations. We aimed to evaluate agreement between patient-performed abdominal self-examinations using the SEAP and physician-performed abdominal examinations.Methods We conducted a prospective, single-center study at the American University of Beirut Medical Center ED in Lebanon from August 2023-August 2024. Adult patients who presented with abdominal pain and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Each patient performed a video-guided abdominal self-examination by following a brief instructional video (SEAP). The SEAP was developed by an emergency medicine faculty at our institution using pre-established abdominal examination principles and clinical practice frameworks. The protocol was translated into a structured, two-minute instructional video. Blinded abdominal examinations were then performed by an emergency medicine resident and an attending physician. The primary outcome was agreement in abdominal tenderness across seven predefined regions, assessed using the Cohen kappa coefficient. Patient experience and feasibility measures were also collected.Results We included a total of 103 patients. Agreement between patient-performed and physician-performed examinations was slight to fair across six of the seven abdominal regions (κ range, .13-.41). The highest agreement was observed in the right lower quadrant, with fair agreement between patients and residents (κ = .47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.64) and patients and attending physicians (κ = .36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.53). Agreement in the remaining regions, including the upper quadrants and flanks, remained low; right upper quadrant (κ = .13), left upper quadrant (κ = .28), and flanks (κ range, -0.04 to .41). Most patients (97.9%; n = 94/96) rated the instructional video as clear and easy to follow.Conclusion Patient-performed abdominal self-examination using the SEAP demonstrated limited agreement with physician examinations across most abdominal regions. Agreement in the right lower quadrant was also fair. These findings indicate that patient-performed abdominal self-examination does not reliably reproduce physician assessment. However, they provide a foundation for further studies aimed at refining and better defining the role of patient-guided abdominal examinations in telemedicine settings.
SN - 1936-900X
SN - 1936-9018
ER -