Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

O Mirror, Where Art Thou?

Abstract

Wavefront sensing reveals that a telescope is misaligned, but not which mirror moved or by how much; inferring the mirror positions themselves turns alignment into a direct correction. We describe a simulation framework for inferring telescope mirror misalignment from multi-field Point Spread Function (PSF) measurements projected onto Circular-Bessel and Zernike basis vectors. Two case studies are presented: a Hubble Space Telescope model with five secondary-mirror degrees of freedom and a three-mirror anastigmat with ten primary and secondary mirror degrees of freedom. In both cases, field-dependent multivariate Gaussian likelihoods are explored with nested sampling and refined with differential evolution. Recovered states are validated with residual PSF images and optical path difference (OPD) measurements. In the Hubble benchmark, differential evolution recovers injected misalignments to less than 0.01 microns and reduces on-axis OPD error from 2.3 waves to 3 x 10E-8 waves. In the TMA study, the posterior shows broad marginals and correlated parameter pairs that suggest partial degeneracies at higher dimension; differential evolution recovers the truth alignment state less precisely than in the Hubble benchmark (less than 17 microns) and reduces on-axis OPD error from 8.24 waves to 2 x 10E-3 waves. This generalizable algorithm enables direct sensing of the state of an optical system and automated alignment.

Related

  1. Mirror modes and magnetic holes in Mercury’s magnetosheath. Nonlinear evolution under turbulent solar-wind conditions
    Giulio Ballerini, C. Simon Wedlund, F. Califano +3
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  2. Singlet Extended Mirror Standard Model World as Dark Matter and Gravitational Waves Imprints of a High Scale Mirror Phase Transitions
    Asterios T. Papadopoulos, V. K. Oikonomou
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  3. Where a Dark-Energy-Tied Galaxy Law Holds and Where It Breaks: Low-Acceleration Tests, a Two-Footing Shear Pass, and the Satellite-Dwarf Excess (Working Note)
    Carl P. Zimmerman
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Peer-reviewedCC BY6 citedCosmologyOpenAlex
  4. Overview And Present Status Of The 4-m International Liquid Mirror Telescope (ILMT)
    Jean Surdej, Bhavya Ailawadhi, Talat Akhunov +11
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  5. Where Do Newton's Laws Fail? — Two Perspectives on Universal Gravitation and the Accurate Relativistic Mass-Energy Formulation
    Chinnaraji Annamalai
    PreprintCC BYFull text10 citedGeneral astronomyOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{p2026mirror,
  title = {{O Mirror, Where Art Thou?}},
  author = {Sai Krishanth P. M. and Sanchit Sabhlok and Jaren N. Ashcraft and Kyle Van Gorkom and Ewan S. Douglas},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.33942},
  eprint = {2610.33942},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33942},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - O Mirror, Where Art Thou?
AU  - Sai Krishanth P. M.
AU  - Sanchit Sabhlok
AU  - Jaren N. Ashcraft
AU  - Kyle Van Gorkom
AU  - Ewan S. Douglas
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/24
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.33942
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33942
AB  - Wavefront sensing reveals that a telescope is misaligned, but not which mirror moved or by how much; inferring the mirror positions themselves turns alignment into a direct correction. We describe a simulation framework for inferring telescope mirror misalignment from multi-field Point Spread Function (PSF) measurements projected onto Circular-Bessel and Zernike basis vectors. Two case studies are presented: a Hubble Space Telescope model with five secondary-mirror degrees of freedom and a three-mirror anastigmat with ten primary and secondary mirror degrees of freedom. In both cases, field-dependent multivariate Gaussian likelihoods are explored with nested sampling and refined with differential evolution. Recovered states are validated with residual PSF images and optical path difference (OPD) measurements. In the Hubble benchmark, differential evolution recovers injected misalignments to less than 0.01 microns and reduces on-axis OPD error from 2.3 waves to 3 x 10E-8 waves. In the TMA study, the posterior shows broad marginals and correlated parameter pairs that suggest partial degeneracies at higher dimension; differential evolution recovers the truth alignment state less precisely than in the Hubble benchmark (less than 17 microns) and reduces on-axis OPD error from 8.24 waves to 2 x 10E-3 waves. This generalizable algorithm enables direct sensing of the state of an optical system and automated alignment.
ER  -