Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

Revisiting the Unknown Unknowns in Transient Astrophysics with the SKA Telescopes

1 more authors

Abstract

It was already recognised in the 2004 and 2014 SKA Science Case Chapters: "The Exploration of the Unknown" and "The SKA and the Unknown Unknowns", respectively, that the exploration of the unknown is an extremely important concept in realising the potential of any new instrument. This is especially true in an era of limited budgets but expanding analysis algorithms and capabilities. While this Chapter considers transients and environments, the ethos of these previous Chapters should be considered and embraced broadly and can be applied more broadly across SKAO science. We do not repeat in detail the important background these Chapters provide but encourage the reader to review them before reading this Chapter. In the last decade of radio transient astronomy, we have seen the value of these approaches with the expansion of the FRB population, the discovery of long period pulsars and transients and radio emission from white dwarfs to name just a few. With the SKAO, we should push the explored parameter space further and in new directions in all of the sensitivity, field-of-view, time, spectral, spectro-dynamic, polarisation and imaging domains. We should utilise approaches such as machine learning in allowing us to address the complexity that arises from the expanded parameter space and increased data rates and candidate sources. We will briefly summarise some of the impressive progress that the SKA pathfinders and precursors have made in these areas and what these mean for the SKA telescopes. We will also discuss ways in which it might be possible to push the current capabilities.

Related

  1. The contribution of Soviet scientists to the emergence of high-energy neutrino astrophysics: from the Cherenkov effect to underwater and in-ice telescopes
    Bakhromzod Rizoi
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsGeneral physicsarXiv
  2. Early Optical Follow-up of Gamma-Ray Bursts: The Critical Role of Robotic Telescopes
    Rahul Gupta, Judith Racusin, Gor Oganesyan +26
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral astronomyGeneral physicsHAL
  3. AI's Capability in Assisting Scientific Research in Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology I: Literature Review
    Anamaria Hell, Kateryna Vovk, Veena Krishnaraj +18
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral astronomyApplied physics & instrumentationHAL
  4. AI's Capability in Assisting Scientific Research in Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology II: Project Planning and Proposal Evaluation
    Jia Liu, Veena Krishnaraj, Kateryna Vovk +18
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral astronomyApplied physics & instrumentationHAL
  5. Progress in quantum telescopes
    David R. Gozzard, Fiona H. Panther, Andrew G. White
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{andersson2026revisiting,
  title = {{Revisiting the Unknown Unknowns in Transient Astrophysics with the SKA Telescopes}},
  author = {A. Andersson and M. Caleb and J. Callingham and A. Deller and D. Dobie and N. Hurley-Walker and B. Marcote and K. Rajwade and A. Rowlinson and B. Stappers and M. Trudu and H. Vedantham and A. Weltman},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.28347},
  eprint = {2610.28347},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28347},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Revisiting the Unknown Unknowns in Transient Astrophysics with the SKA Telescopes
AU  - A. Andersson
AU  - M. Caleb
AU  - J. Callingham
AU  - A. Deller
AU  - D. Dobie
AU  - N. Hurley-Walker
AU  - B. Marcote
AU  - K. Rajwade
AU  - A. Rowlinson
AU  - B. Stappers
AU  - M. Trudu
AU  - H. Vedantham
AU  - A. Weltman
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.28347
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28347
AB  - It was already recognised in the 2004 and 2014 SKA Science Case Chapters: "The Exploration of the Unknown" and "The SKA and the Unknown Unknowns", respectively, that the exploration of the unknown is an extremely important concept in realising the potential of any new instrument. This is especially true in an era of limited budgets but expanding analysis algorithms and capabilities. While this Chapter considers transients and environments, the ethos of these previous Chapters should be considered and embraced broadly and can be applied more broadly across SKAO science. We do not repeat in detail the important background these Chapters provide but encourage the reader to review them before reading this Chapter. In the last decade of radio transient astronomy, we have seen the value of these approaches with the expansion of the FRB population, the discovery of long period pulsars and transients and radio emission from white dwarfs to name just a few. With the SKAO, we should push the explored parameter space further and in new directions in all of the sensitivity, field-of-view, time, spectral, spectro-dynamic, polarisation and imaging domains. We should utilise approaches such as machine learning in allowing us to address the complexity that arises from the expanded parameter space and increased data rates and candidate sources. We will briefly summarise some of the impressive progress that the SKA pathfinders and precursors have made in these areas and what these mean for the SKA telescopes. We will also discuss ways in which it might be possible to push the current capabilities.
ER  -