Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Testing Implies Distance Estimation with Polynomial Loss

Abstract

A tester decides whether a graph has a property or is far from having it. A distance estimator asks for more: it must approximately determine how many edges need to be changed. A property is said to be testable if there is a tester with a number of queries bounded independently of the graph's order for each conceivable distance. Similarly, if a property admits an estimator with a number of queries bounded independently of the graph's order, it is said to be estimable. Fischer and Newman proved that, in the dense graph model, every testable property is also estimable. We show that the passage from testing to estimation requires only a polynomial increase in query complexity. This resolves a long-standing open problem in property testing, previously tackled by Fiat and Ron, by Hoppen, Kohayakawa, Lang, Lefmann, and Stagni, and by Gishboliner, Kushnir, and Shapira.

Related

  1. Geometric parameter sequences for Q-polynomial distance-regular graphs
    Jae-Ho Lee, Jongyook Park, Ian Seong
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. On the Peak Estimation of Scalar Polynomial Systems via Integrability
    Karolína Sehnalová
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textDynamical systemsOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Total Variation Distance Estimation through Domain Reduction
    Arnab Bhattacharyya, Graham Cormode, Yucheng Fu +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
  4. On the estimation of the Gromov-Hausdorff distance
    Emin Abdullaev
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  5. Polynomial-time classical simulation of boson and fermion sampling under thermal loss
    Armando Angrisani, Hela Mhiri
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsOptics & photonicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{carenini2026testing,
  title = {{Testing Implies Distance Estimation with Polynomial Loss}},
  author = {Gaia Carenini and Cameron Seth},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.04276},
  eprint = {2611.04276},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04276},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Testing Implies Distance Estimation with Polynomial Loss
AU  - Gaia Carenini
AU  - Cameron Seth
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.04276
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04276
AB  - A tester decides whether a graph has a property or is far from having it. A distance estimator asks for more: it must approximately determine how many edges need to be changed. A property is said to be testable if there is a tester with a number of queries bounded independently of the graph's order for each conceivable distance. Similarly, if a property admits an estimator with a number of queries bounded independently of the graph's order, it is said to be estimable. Fischer and Newman proved that, in the dense graph model, every testable property is also estimable. We show that the passage from testing to estimation requires only a polynomial increase in query complexity. This resolves a long-standing open problem in property testing, previously tackled by Fiat and Ron, by Hoppen, Kohayakawa, Lang, Lefmann, and Stagni, and by Gishboliner, Kushnir, and Shapira.
ER  -