PreprintarXiv licencearXiv
A Counterexample to Wormald's Conjecture
Abstract
We give a counterexample to Wormald's conjecture. A 16-vertex cubic graph, the disjoint union of K3,3 with a 10-vertex bridged graph built from two subdivided copies of K4, has no partition of its edges into two isomorphic spanning linear forests. The obstruction is parity: any such partition would force every monochromatic component to have even order while requiring a five-vertex side of a bridge to be partitioned into such components. Adjoining copies of K4 gives counterexamples in every order 16+4t. The counterexample is disconnected and leaves the connected case unresolved. The full family is verified in Lean without custom axioms.
Related
BibTeX
@misc{schreib2026counterexample,
title = {{A Counterexample to Wormald's Conjecture}},
author = {James Alexander Schreib},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.00086},
eprint = {2610.00086},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00086},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - A Counterexample to Wormald's Conjecture
AU - James Alexander Schreib
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.00086
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00086
AB - We give a counterexample to Wormald's conjecture. A 16-vertex cubic graph, the disjoint union of K_3,3 with a 10-vertex bridged graph built from two subdivided copies of K_4, has no partition of its edges into two isomorphic spanning linear forests. The obstruction is parity: any such partition would force every monochromatic component to have even order while requiring a five-vertex side of a bridge to be partitioned into such components. Adjoining copies of K_4 gives counterexamples in every order 16+4t. The counterexample is disconnected and leaves the connected case unresolved. The full family is verified in Lean without custom axioms.
ER -