Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery

Long-Term Impedance Trends Over 10 Years Following Cochlear Implantation: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis

  1. 1Ear Research Center Dresden, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany

Abstract

Importance: Impedance monitoring is a critical component of cochlear implant (CI) surgery, yet the lack of comprehensive longitudinal data limits the development of evidence-based postoperative monitoring guidelines, potentially compromising patient outcomes.

Objective: To track impedance trends over 10 years post-implantation, evaluate the effects of electrode design on impedance dynamics, and examine the influence of patient age on impedance behavior.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary medical center.

Participants: A total of 554 ears underwent cochlear implantation between June 2006 and December 2014; each ear received 1 electrode array from 1 of 6 electrode types.

Exposure or Intervention: Longitudinal impedance data were analyzed across apical, medial, and basal electrode contacts at 7 time points.

Main Outcome Measures: Impedance trajectories varied by age group, electrode design, and cochlear region, with persistent changes observed up to 10 years.

Results: Impedance increased markedly from intraoperative to first activation in most arrays, although a significant decrease in apical contacts was observed in CI512 adults (P = .0008). Apical and medial contacts generally stabilized or declined thereafter. In contrast, basal electrodes exhibited more heterogeneous patterns, including increases during 12 to 60 months of follow-up and decreases during 60 to 120 months. Compared to PM arrays, LW electrodes showed higher apical impedances, medial impedances that were mostly comparable and time-dependent, and persistently lower basal impedances than CI512. Among LW arrays, CI422 consistently demonstrated the highest impedance, whereas the MED-EL electrode series, Flexsoft exhibited the highest impedance. Overall impedances were higher in early childhood recipients, while adults tended to show higher values in the basal region.

Conclusion: This study provides the first decade-long characterization of impedance changes, revealing dynamic variations in electrode impedance across different designs and age groups of cochlear implant recipients.

Relevance: This study highlights the need for long-term monitoring and offering practical guidance for individualized programming and electrode design.

Related

  1. Simultaneous Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in a Child with Warsaw Breakage Syndrome and Normal Cochlear Morphology: A Case Report and Focused Literature Review
    Pinelopi Samara, Michail Athanasopoulos, Nikolaos Markatos +2
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Tinnitus outcomes after cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: an exploratory prospective multicenter study
    Jae-Jin Song, Yeonjoo Choi, Yehree Kim +3
    Frontiers in neurologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  3. Effect of Residual Astigmatism on Visual Acuity Following Bifocal, Trifocal, and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Qi Chen, Tingting Peng, Huafang Guo +1
    Ophthalmology and TherapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  4. Cochlear implantation without general anaesthesia: a resource-efficient surgical pathway
    Holly Mould, Emma Stapleton
    The Journal of Laryngology and OtologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  5. Comparative outcomes of axillary, jugular, and subclavian venous access for totally implantable venous access port implantation: a 335-case single-center retrospective study.
    Lei Tang, Qingchuan Wang, Junyong Yu +5
    BMC surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{deng2026longterm,
  title = {{Long-Term Impedance Trends Over 10 Years Following Cochlear Implantation: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis}},
  author = {Jianhang Deng and Martin Koch and Matthias Bornitz and Sijia Zhai and Marcus Neudert and Till Moritz Essinger},
  journal = {Journal of Otolaryngology - Head \& Neck Surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1177/19160216261442102},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216261442102},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Long-Term Impedance Trends Over 10 Years Following Cochlear Implantation: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis
AU  - Jianhang Deng
AU  - Martin Koch
AU  - Matthias Bornitz
AU  - Sijia Zhai
AU  - Marcus Neudert
AU  - Till Moritz Essinger
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
JO  - Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
DO  - 10.1177/19160216261442102
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216261442102
AB  - Importance: Impedance monitoring is a critical component of cochlear implant (CI) surgery, yet the lack of comprehensive longitudinal data limits the development of evidence-based postoperative monitoring guidelines, potentially compromising patient outcomes.  Objective: To track impedance trends over 10 years post-implantation, evaluate the effects of electrode design on impedance dynamics, and examine the influence of patient age on impedance behavior.  Design: Retrospective cohort study.  Setting: Tertiary medical center.  Participants: A total of 554 ears underwent cochlear implantation between June 2006 and December 2014; each ear received 1 electrode array from 1 of 6 electrode types.  Exposure or Intervention: Longitudinal impedance data were analyzed across apical, medial, and basal electrode contacts at 7 time points.  Main Outcome Measures: Impedance trajectories varied by age group, electrode design, and cochlear region, with persistent changes observed up to 10 years.  Results: Impedance increased markedly from intraoperative to first activation in most arrays, although a significant decrease in apical contacts was observed in CI512 adults (P = .0008). Apical and medial contacts generally stabilized or declined thereafter. In contrast, basal electrodes exhibited more heterogeneous patterns, including increases during 12 to 60 months of follow-up and decreases during 60 to 120 months. Compared to PM arrays, LW electrodes showed higher apical impedances, medial impedances that were mostly comparable and time-dependent, and persistently lower basal impedances than CI512. Among LW arrays, CI422 consistently demonstrated the highest impedance, whereas the MED-EL electrode series, Flexsoft exhibited the highest impedance. Overall impedances were higher in early childhood recipients, while adults tended to show higher values in the basal region.  Conclusion: This study provides the first decade-long characterization of impedance changes, revealing dynamic variations in electrode impedance across different designs and age groups of cochlear implant recipients.  Relevance: This study highlights the need for long-term monitoring and offering practical guidance for individualized programming and electrode design.
SN  - 1916-0208
SN  - 1916-0216
ER  -