General Anesthesia vs Procedural Sedation and Post-Thrombectomy Stress Hyperglycemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- 1Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Abstract
BackgroundThe optimal anesthetic strategy for mechanical thrombectomy remains contested; clinical trials and meta-analyses yield conflicting results. Emerging evidence has shown stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) to be among the strongest independent predictors of poor thrombectomy outcomes. General anesthesia (GA) is known to provoke a more pronounced neuroendocrine stress response than procedural sedation, yet no prior study has investigated perioperative glucose dynamics between GA and sedation in thrombectomy patients.
MethodsUsing the TriNetX federated research network, we conducted a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of non-diabetic adults undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke under GA versus sedation. After propensity score matching 2,556 matched pairs remained.
ResultsAt the population level, mean glucose divergence was modest in absolute terms (Day 0: 110.90 vs 106.77 mg/dL; {Delta} = 4.13 mg/dL; p = 7.82 x 10-11; Day 1: 107.69 vs 103.25 mg/dL; {Delta} = 4.44 mg/dL; p = 8.16 x 10-14). GA conferred an 83.2% relative risk increase to severe-range hyperglycemia, defined as blood glucose > 181 mg/dL on the day of the index procedure (Day 0: RR = 1.832, 95% CI 1.457 - 2.303; NNH: 29), with effects persisting on day 1 following the thrombectomy (Day 1: RR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.228 - 2.249). GA patients received significantly more exogenous insulin on both days 0 (GA: 21.24%, Sedation: 17.23%, RR = 1.231, p = 2.96 x 10-4) and day 1 (GA: 11.3%, Sedation: 8.69%, RR = 1.30, p = 0.00178). All primary outcomes survived Bonferroni correction.
ConclusionGeneral anesthesia is strongly associated with persistent hyperglycemia following mechanical thrombectomy in non-diabetic patients. These findings identify anesthesia-modality as a potential modifiable risk and provides a mechanistic hypothesis in the ongoing GA versus CS debate for thrombectomy. Future glucose management protocols may need to be tailored to anesthetic strategy.
Related
- Auditory Evoked Potentials Across Cognitive States: Awake, Sleep, Sedation, and Anesthesia
- Adjunctive Cerebrolysin therapy following mechanical thrombectomy for tandem right internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery occlusion with residual post-procedural perfusion deficit: a case report
- Procedural sedation and analgesia outside the operating room: Drug selection, safety, and emerging trends.
- Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation During Synchronized Electrical Cardioversion in the Emergency Department
- Sedation and anaesthesia in pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation: mechanisms, procedural requirements, and real-world practice.
BibTeX
@misc{laichetty2026general,
title = {{General Anesthesia vs Procedural Sedation and Post-Thrombectomy Stress Hyperglycemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study}},
author = {A. Laichetty and K. Zhou and W. C. Broaddus},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.02.26362114},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.26362114v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - General Anesthesia vs Procedural Sedation and Post-Thrombectomy Stress Hyperglycemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
AU - A. Laichetty
AU - K. Zhou
AU - W. C. Broaddus
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/02
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.02.26362114
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.26362114v1
AB - BackgroundThe optimal anesthetic strategy for mechanical thrombectomy remains contested; clinical trials and meta-analyses yield conflicting results. Emerging evidence has shown stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) to be among the strongest independent predictors of poor thrombectomy outcomes. General anesthesia (GA) is known to provoke a more pronounced neuroendocrine stress response than procedural sedation, yet no prior study has investigated perioperative glucose dynamics between GA and sedation in thrombectomy patients. MethodsUsing the TriNetX federated research network, we conducted a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of non-diabetic adults undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke under GA versus sedation. After propensity score matching 2,556 matched pairs remained. ResultsAt the population level, mean glucose divergence was modest in absolute terms (Day 0: 110.90 vs 106.77 mg/dL; {Delta} = 4.13 mg/dL; p = 7.82 x 10-11; Day 1: 107.69 vs 103.25 mg/dL; {Delta} = 4.44 mg/dL; p = 8.16 x 10-14). GA conferred an 83.2% relative risk increase to severe-range hyperglycemia, defined as blood glucose > 181 mg/dL on the day of the index procedure (Day 0: RR = 1.832, 95% CI 1.457 - 2.303; NNH: 29), with effects persisting on day 1 following the thrombectomy (Day 1: RR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.228 - 2.249). GA patients received significantly more exogenous insulin on both days 0 (GA: 21.24%, Sedation: 17.23%, RR = 1.231, p = 2.96 x 10-4) and day 1 (GA: 11.3%, Sedation: 8.69%, RR = 1.30, p = 0.00178). All primary outcomes survived Bonferroni correction. ConclusionGeneral anesthesia is strongly associated with persistent hyperglycemia following mechanical thrombectomy in non-diabetic patients. These findings identify anesthesia-modality as a potential modifiable risk and provides a mechanistic hypothesis in the ongoing GA versus CS debate for thrombectomy. Future glucose management protocols may need to be tailored to anesthetic strategy.
ER -