My care, my choice: a qualitative phenomenological exploration of women’s rights to choose maternal healthcare providers and services in Ari Zone, Southern Ethiopia
- 1Department of Midwifery, Jinka University, Jinka, Ethiopia
- 2Department of Public Health, Jinka University, Jinka, Ethiopia
- 3Department of Nursing, Bonga University, Bonga, South West, Ethiopia
Abstract
Objectives: Maternal health has shifted from a narrow focus on survival to a rights-based paradigm emphasising the quality of the birthing experience. This study explored participants’ lived experiences in the Ari Zone, southern Ethiopia, regarding their right to choose their preferred maternal healthcare providers.
Design: A qualitative descriptive phenomenological study using face-to-face, semi-structured, in-depth interviews, analysed using Colaizzi’s seven-step method with OpenCode software (V.4.2).
Setting: Public maternal healthcare services in the Ari Zone, South Ethiopia Regional State, southern Ethiopia.
Participants: 18 postpartum women (n=18), aged 20–39 years, purposively selected from women who had used maternal health services in the Ari Zone at least twice in the preceding 12 months.
Results: Four themes emerged. Participants described the healthcare environment as a rigid hierarchy in which top-down provider assignment and resource constraints constrained perceived choice and autonomy. The desire to select a provider was often described as a response to prior obstetric trauma or trusted community narratives about provider conduct. In the absence of formal choice, participants described informal strategies, such as timing visits to trusted shifts or emotionally withdrawing, to exert limited control over their care. They also envisioned person-centred care in which choice of provider was framed as integral to dignity and clinical safety.
Conclusions: Service coverage alone did not capture important dimensions of maternal healthcare quality, including dignity, autonomy and perceived choice. Participants described how provider assignment, limited information about available providers, resource constraints and concerns about provider conduct constrained their perceived ability to exercise choice. In the absence of formal mechanisms for choosing providers, some participants described informal strategies to retain limited control over their care. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening women’s participation in decisions about their maternal healthcare and creating care environments that support dignity, respect and autonomy. The findings should be interpreted within the context of this qualitative study and should not be generalised beyond the study population and setting.
Related
- Menopause Literacy Gaps Across Individual, Healthcare and Societal Levels: A Qualitative Study of Women's Experiences and Healthcare Providers' Perspectives.
- Short courses on maternal mental health provided by healthcare providers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
- Untimely follow-up after cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study among healthcare providers in Flanders (Belgium)
- The Role of Competency-Based Equipment User Training in Enhancing Healthcare Providers Skills in Utilizing bCPAP Devices for Newborn Care in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A Qualitative Study
- Understanding the experience of healthcare providers in delivering care to older adults presenting in emergency departments: a qualitative study.
BibTeX
@article{minuta2026care,
title = {{My care, my choice: a qualitative phenomenological exploration of women’s rights to choose maternal healthcare providers and services in Ari Zone, Southern Ethiopia}},
author = {Worku Mimani Minuta and Abera Gezume Ganta and Getachew Nigussie Bolado},
journal = {BMJ Open},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2026-123419},
url = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-123419},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - My care, my choice: a qualitative phenomenological exploration of women’s rights to choose maternal healthcare providers and services in Ari Zone, Southern Ethiopia
AU - Worku Mimani Minuta
AU - Abera Gezume Ganta
AU - Getachew Nigussie Bolado
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - BMJ Open
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-123419
UR - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-123419
AB - Objectives: Maternal health has shifted from a narrow focus on survival to a rights-based paradigm emphasising the quality of the birthing experience. This study explored participants’ lived experiences in the Ari Zone, southern Ethiopia, regarding their right to choose their preferred maternal healthcare providers. Design: A qualitative descriptive phenomenological study using face-to-face, semi-structured, in-depth interviews, analysed using Colaizzi’s seven-step method with OpenCode software (V.4.2). Setting: Public maternal healthcare services in the Ari Zone, South Ethiopia Regional State, southern Ethiopia. Participants: 18 postpartum women (n=18), aged 20–39 years, purposively selected from women who had used maternal health services in the Ari Zone at least twice in the preceding 12 months. Results: Four themes emerged. Participants described the healthcare environment as a rigid hierarchy in which top-down provider assignment and resource constraints constrained perceived choice and autonomy. The desire to select a provider was often described as a response to prior obstetric trauma or trusted community narratives about provider conduct. In the absence of formal choice, participants described informal strategies, such as timing visits to trusted shifts or emotionally withdrawing, to exert limited control over their care. They also envisioned person-centred care in which choice of provider was framed as integral to dignity and clinical safety. Conclusions: Service coverage alone did not capture important dimensions of maternal healthcare quality, including dignity, autonomy and perceived choice. Participants described how provider assignment, limited information about available providers, resource constraints and concerns about provider conduct constrained their perceived ability to exercise choice. In the absence of formal mechanisms for choosing providers, some participants described informal strategies to retain limited control over their care. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening women’s participation in decisions about their maternal healthcare and creating care environments that support dignity, respect and autonomy. The findings should be interpreted within the context of this qualitative study and should not be generalised beyond the study population and setting.
SN - 2044-6055
SN - 2044-6055
ER -