Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,546 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology

External Load During Warm-Up and Early-Match Running Performance of Starting and Substitute Football Players: A Within-Player Comparison.

  1. 1Department of Sport Sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.
  2. 2Performance and Health Department, FC Lugano, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.
  3. 3FSI Lab, Football Science Institute, 18016 Granada, Spain.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to: (1) compare the absolute and relative external load during the warm-up of starting and substitute professional football players; (2) describe the subsequent running performance during the first 15 min of match play; and (3) quantify the within-player variability of the warm-up (WU) external load between roles. Methods: Sixteen professional male players (Swiss Second Division) were monitored using 10 Hz GPS units across 13 official matches (106 observations). Starters completed a standardized ~25 min on-field warm-up, while substitutes performed a cyclical sideline warm-up. Running performance was analysed during the first 15 min of play and across three consecutive 5 min intervals (0-5, 5-10, and 10-15 min) in the same players under both match-entry conditions: starters and substitutes. Results: Starters' warm-up showed significantly longer duration (p < 0.001; d = 3.5), greater total distance covered in both absolute and relative terms (p < 0.001, d = 6.6; p < 0.001, d = 5.1, respectively), and higher maximal speed (p < 0.001; d = 1.4) compared to substitutes. However, substitutes covered more distance between 19.8 and 25.2 km·h⁻¹ in either absolute and relative terms (p < 0.05, d = 1.3; p < 0.001, d = 3.6; respectively). No significant differences were found in external load during the overall 0-15 min match period between roles. Nevertheless, block-specific analysis revealed that substitutes performed significantly a greater number of decelerations (p < 0.05; d = 0.5), distance covered between 19.8 and 25.2 km·h⁻¹ (p < 0.05; d = 0.79) and sprinting during the initial 0-5 min period (p < 0.05; d = 1.24). Conclusions: Substitutes' warm-up exhibited substantially higher variability across almost all external load metrics compared with the warm-up completed by the starters, except for slightly higher or identical variability in the number of accelerations and decelerations.

Related

  1. Comparison of lower extremity peak muscle forces and force-generating capacities during the functional side hop test in male collegiate football players with and without chronic ankle instability
    Sarit Suwanmana, Parunchaya Jamkrajang, Mark A. Robinson +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  2. Does Preseason Training Load Shape Body Composition? External Load, Internal Load, and Fatigue in Semi-Professional Football Players.
    José Carlos Ponce-Bordón, Jorge Polo-Tejada, David Lobo-Triviño +1
    Journal of functional morphology and kinesiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Relationship between upward social comparison and adolescent depression: moderating roles of football participation
    Yi Zheng, Huarui Huang, Anzu Li +3
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. The influence of task constraints on football players’ performance: non-linear trends during goalkeeper training
    Elliot Bastias, Fabian W. Otte, James Vaughan +2
    Biology of SportPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  5. Development of the football tactical skills scale and comparison of scores across player and training characteristics.
    Oğuzhan Eroğlu, Alper Karadağ
    BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{bagattini2026external,
  title = {{External Load During Warm-Up and Early-Match Running Performance of Starting and Substitute Football Players: A Within-Player Comparison.}},
  author = {Gabriele Bagattini and Luis Suarez-Arrones and Manuele Ferrini and Jose Asian-Clemente},
  journal = {Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jfmk11040432},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42924711},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - External Load During Warm-Up and Early-Match Running Performance of Starting and Substitute Football Players: A Within-Player Comparison.
AU  - Gabriele Bagattini
AU  - Luis Suarez-Arrones
AU  - Manuele Ferrini
AU  - Jose Asian-Clemente
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology
DO  - 10.3390/jfmk11040432
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42924711
AB  - Objectives: This study aimed to: (1) compare the absolute and relative external load during the warm-up of starting and substitute professional football players; (2) describe the subsequent running performance during the first 15 min of match play; and (3) quantify the within-player variability of the warm-up (WU) external load between roles. Methods: Sixteen professional male players (Swiss Second Division) were monitored using 10 Hz GPS units across 13 official matches (106 observations). Starters completed a standardized ~25 min on-field warm-up, while substitutes performed a cyclical sideline warm-up. Running performance was analysed during the first 15 min of play and across three consecutive 5 min intervals (0-5, 5-10, and 10-15 min) in the same players under both match-entry conditions: starters and substitutes. Results: Starters' warm-up showed significantly longer duration (p < 0.001; d = 3.5), greater total distance covered in both absolute and relative terms (p < 0.001, d = 6.6; p < 0.001, d = 5.1, respectively), and higher maximal speed (p < 0.001; d = 1.4) compared to substitutes. However, substitutes covered more distance between 19.8 and 25.2 km·h⁻¹ in either absolute and relative terms (p < 0.05, d = 1.3; p < 0.001, d = 3.6; respectively). No significant differences were found in external load during the overall 0-15 min match period between roles. Nevertheless, block-specific analysis revealed that substitutes performed significantly a greater number of decelerations (p < 0.05; d = 0.5), distance covered between 19.8 and 25.2 km·h⁻¹ (p < 0.05; d = 0.79) and sprinting during the initial 0-5 min period (p < 0.05; d = 1.24). Conclusions: Substitutes' warm-up exhibited substantially higher variability across almost all external load metrics compared with the warm-up completed by the starters, except for slightly higher or identical variability in the number of accelerations and decelerations.
SN  - 2411-5142
ER  -