Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Non-Invariance in Nested Prediction Models under Selective Predictor Availability

Abstract

We used nested models as a framework for characterising the consequences of a selectively measured predictor in clinical prediction models. In this framework, a model containing predictors available in the target population is referred to as the restricted model, while the extended model additionally includes a selectively measured predictor. We show that non-invariance in the restricted model between selected patients and the target population decomposes into components due to omission of the additional predictor, potential residual non-invariance, and their interaction. This framework is extended to a predictor measured via multiple routes of selection resulting in collider structures. We further show that imputation based on the conditional distribution of the additional predictor in the selected population transfers the restricted-model non-invariance to the imputed extended model as imputation bias. In a forthcoming version, this framework will be illustrated using real world and simulated data. The framework provides a formal basis for understanding how selective predictor measurement affects generalisability of clinical prediction models using routinely collected health data.

Related

  1. Influence of continuous predictor modelling methods on prediction stability in clinical prediction model development: an empirical comparison using real clinical data
    Phichayut Phinyo, Pakpoom Wongyikul, Noraworn Jirattikanwong +5
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. How Many Labels Does Model Choice Need? Certificates and Budgets for Selective Prediction
    Tetsuji Kuboyama
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Abstention Spends Its Budget on Local Label Variance More Than on Novelty: Auditing Conformal Calibration and Selective Prediction under Molecular Scaffold Shift
    Arnav Srivastava, Krishna Kassetty
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Locally recoverable codes from elliptic surfaces with availability and hierarchical locality
    Elena Berardini, Andrea Fornetto
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral mathematicsHAL
  5. A nested factor model for equity markets: reconciling multifractal stock returns and rough index volatilities
    Othmane Zarhali, Cecilia Aubrun, Emmanuel Bacry +2
    Quantitative FinancePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral mathematicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{delord2026noninvariance,
  title = {{Non-Invariance in Nested Prediction Models under Selective Predictor Availability}},
  author = {Marc Delord},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.02836},
  eprint = {2609.02836},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02836},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Non-Invariance in Nested Prediction Models under Selective Predictor Availability
AU  - Marc Delord
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.02836
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02836
AB  - We used nested models as a framework for characterising the consequences of a selectively measured predictor in clinical prediction models. In this framework, a model containing predictors available in the target population is referred to as the restricted model, while the extended model additionally includes a selectively measured predictor. We show that non-invariance in the restricted model between selected patients and the target population decomposes into components due to omission of the additional predictor, potential residual non-invariance, and their interaction. This framework is extended to a predictor measured via multiple routes of selection resulting in collider structures. We further show that imputation based on the conditional distribution of the additional predictor in the selected population transfers the restricted-model non-invariance to the imputed extended model as imputation bias. In a forthcoming version, this framework will be illustrated using real world and simulated data. The framework provides a formal basis for understanding how selective predictor measurement affects generalisability of clinical prediction models using routinely collected health data.
ER  -