Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Clinical Performance of a Contemporary Hybrid Surface Implant System—A Prospective Pilot Study

  1. 1Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA
  2. 2Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, LSU Health-New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
  3. 3Department of Radiology, School of Dentistry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Contemporary implant designs incorporating progressive macrogeometry and hybrid surface characteristics are intended to enhance primary stability while supporting favorable peri-implant tissue outcomes. This prospective cohort study evaluated the 2-year clinical, radiographic, prosthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of a contemporary hybrid surface tapered implant system with progressive macrogeometry. Methods: Thirty participants received 31 implants and were prospectively followed. Twenty-nine participants (30 implants) completed the 2-year follow-up evaluation. The study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05498662). Treatment protocols, including adjunctive grafting and loading, were selected according to predefined clinical criteria. Outcomes included implant survival and success, implant stability, peri-implant clinical parameters, marginal bone levels, prosthetic complications, and patient-reported satisfaction. Standardized radiographs were obtained longitudinally to assess marginal bone-level changes. Results: No implant failures were observed during the study period, and implant success was 96.7% at 2 years. Mean probing depths remained stable, measuring 2.91 ± 0.91 mm at 1 year and 2.86 ± 1.21 mm at 2 years. Marginal bone levels also remained stable between prosthesis delivery and the 1-year follow-up (mean change: 0.00; p > 0.05) and showed a small coronal shift between the 1- and 2-year evaluations (mean change: −0.17; p < 0.001). Prosthetic complications occurred in 16% of sites. Patient-reported satisfaction remained high throughout follow-up. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this small, single-center prospective cohort study, the evaluated implant system demonstrated acceptable clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Related

  1. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Modified Multi-Tooth Posterior Maxillary Alveolar Segment Infracture Without a Lateral Window for Staged Implant Placement: A Prospective Case Series
    Roman Šmucler, Simona Dianišková, Justina-Anna Šmuclerová
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Comparison of CT-based migration analysis against radiostereometric analysis for assessing two-year migration in an uncemented medial pivot tibial knee implant : clinical implications from a prospective safety study
    Lars Harald William Engseth, Charles Jahren Conrad, Frank-David Øhrn +2
    Bone & joint openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Clinical Performance and Survival Outcomes of All-on-4 Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses in Patients With a Completely Edentulous Arch: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Jay Gohil, Mohammed Taslim Fathima, Dilip Chakravarthy +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Next-generation dental implant surface modifications for osseointegration: From nanoengineering to clinical translation
    Sukumaran Anil, Vishnupriya K Sweety, Anjali Mol +3
    The Journal of International Medical ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  5. Clinical Performance and Safety of the Optima Non-compliant Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Balloon in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Multicenter Real-World Study.
    Sujeet Narain, Chirag Jagdish Parikh, Anup Ashok Pusate +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{kandaswamy2026clinical,
  title = {{Clinical Performance of a Contemporary Hybrid Surface Implant System—A Prospective Pilot Study}},
  author = {Eswar Kandaswamy and Jeanne St Germain and Zixin Li and Qingzhao Yu and David Simmons and John J. Frazier},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218691},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8691},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Clinical Performance of a Contemporary Hybrid Surface Implant System—A Prospective Pilot Study
AU  - Eswar Kandaswamy
AU  - Jeanne St Germain
AU  - Zixin Li
AU  - Qingzhao Yu
AU  - David Simmons
AU  - John J. Frazier
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/07
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218691
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8691
AB  - Background/Objectives: Contemporary implant designs incorporating progressive macrogeometry and hybrid surface characteristics are intended to enhance primary stability while supporting favorable peri-implant tissue outcomes. This prospective cohort study evaluated the 2-year clinical, radiographic, prosthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of a contemporary hybrid surface tapered implant system with progressive macrogeometry. Methods: Thirty participants received 31 implants and were prospectively followed. Twenty-nine participants (30 implants) completed the 2-year follow-up evaluation. The study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05498662). Treatment protocols, including adjunctive grafting and loading, were selected according to predefined clinical criteria. Outcomes included implant survival and success, implant stability, peri-implant clinical parameters, marginal bone levels, prosthetic complications, and patient-reported satisfaction. Standardized radiographs were obtained longitudinally to assess marginal bone-level changes. Results: No implant failures were observed during the study period, and implant success was 96.7% at 2 years. Mean probing depths remained stable, measuring 2.91 ± 0.91 mm at 1 year and 2.86 ± 1.21 mm at 2 years. Marginal bone levels also remained stable between prosthesis delivery and the 1-year follow-up (mean change: 0.00; p > 0.05) and showed a small coronal shift between the 1- and 2-year evaluations (mean change: −0.17; p < 0.001). Prosthetic complications occurred in 16% of sites. Patient-reported satisfaction remained high throughout follow-up. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this small, single-center prospective cohort study, the evaluated implant system demonstrated acceptable clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -