Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Cardiac segmentation for ventricular tachycardia radioablation and radiotherapy patients with cardiac implants

Abstract

Deep-learning (DL) segmentation enables cardiac substructure (CS) delineation for advanced cardiac-sparing radiation therapy (RT). Patients presenting for RT may have implantable devices (cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs)) and metal artifacts. Stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is used to treat ventricular tachycardia (VT), a population frequently with ICDs. We apply a DL model for RT patients with ICDs or undergoing VT-SBRT, enabling segmentation and CS-level dose analysis. CT simulation (CT-SIM) of 19 patients with ICDs and received VT-SBRT were evaluated. A validated segmentation model was retrained using a highly-curated CT-SIM cohort, supplemented with ICD images for training and validation, with a hold-out ICD test set (n=10), to predict 20 CS. Additional CT-SIM datasets included cancer-RT patients with (n=9) and without (n=10) ICDs to evaluate generalizability. The retrained ICD-supplemented model was compared against a non-ICD model using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p<0.05). Dosimetric evaluation was performed for VT-SBRT CS. For VT-SBRT, the ICD-supplemented model achieved average DSC/HD95 of 0.71(0.19)/10.7(22.5)mm respectively, outperforming (p<0.05) the non-ICD model. On CT-SIM with ICDs, average DSC/HD95 were 0.70(0.22)/7.9(5.1)mm respectively, outperforming (p<0.05) the non-ICD model. On CT-SIM without ICDs, the average DSC was 0.74(0.17) (Non-ICD, DSC, 0.75(0.16), p<0.05) and average HD95 was 5.5(3.1)mm (Non-ICD, HD95, 5.3(2.8mm)). For VT-SBRT, CS dose depended on target location, with higher relative dose delivered to the ventricles, tricuspid valve, atrioventricular node, and left coronary arteries than other CS. ICD-supplemented training improved CS segmentation despite metal artifacts without meaningfully degrading non-ICD performance, supporting segmentation and CS-level dosimetry in ICD populations.

Related

  1. Test‐time adaptation‐driven patient‐specific auto‐segmentation for CBCT‐guided online adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer
    Zhiqun Wang, Wei Zhang, Xiangyin Meng +8
    Journal of Applied Clinical Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationPMC
  2. A novel automatic real-time motion tracking method in MRI-guided radiotherapy using enhanced Tracking-Learning-Detection framework with automatic segmentation.
    Shengqi Chen, Zilin Wang, Jianrong Dai +6
    Radiation oncology (London, England)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textApplied physics & instrumentationEurope PMC
  3. Towards Modeling the Hemodynamic Impact of Mitral and Aortic Valve Repair in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Mia Bonini, Michael Ferguson, Marc Hirshvogel +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textBiological & medical physicsComputational physicsarXiv
  4. Dosimetric risk factors for therapy‐related pneumonitis in patients with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy concurrent thoracic radiotherapy
    Ying Lu, Youjia Wang, Guang Han +7
    Precision Radiation OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationPMC
  5. Relevance between patients' clinical factors and 4D-CT lung ventilation heterogeneity for evaluating the adoption of functional avoidance thoracic radiotherapy with a large patient database.
    Guozhong Deng, Yongquan Ying, Xiaomei Wang +5
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textApplied physics & instrumentationEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{summerfield2026cardiac,
  title = {{Cardiac segmentation for ventricular tachycardia radioablation and radiotherapy patients with cardiac implants}},
  author = {Nicholas Summerfield and Dustin Jacqmin and Chase Ruff and Andrew M. Baschnagel and Adam Burr and Michael Bassetti and Ryan Kipp and Matthew Kalscheur and Patrick M. Hill and Ming Dong and Carri Glide-Hurst},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.36367},
  eprint = {2609.36367},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36367},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Cardiac segmentation for ventricular tachycardia radioablation and radiotherapy patients with cardiac implants
AU  - Nicholas Summerfield
AU  - Dustin Jacqmin
AU  - Chase Ruff
AU  - Andrew M. Baschnagel
AU  - Adam Burr
AU  - Michael Bassetti
AU  - Ryan Kipp
AU  - Matthew Kalscheur
AU  - Patrick M. Hill
AU  - Ming Dong
AU  - Carri Glide-Hurst
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.36367
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36367
AB  - Deep-learning (DL) segmentation enables cardiac substructure (CS) delineation for advanced cardiac-sparing radiation therapy (RT). Patients presenting for RT may have implantable devices (cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs)) and metal artifacts. Stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is used to treat ventricular tachycardia (VT), a population frequently with ICDs. We apply a DL model for RT patients with ICDs or undergoing VT-SBRT, enabling segmentation and CS-level dose analysis. CT simulation (CT-SIM) of 19 patients with ICDs and received VT-SBRT were evaluated. A validated segmentation model was retrained using a highly-curated CT-SIM cohort, supplemented with ICD images for training and validation, with a hold-out ICD test set (n=10), to predict 20 CS. Additional CT-SIM datasets included cancer-RT patients with (n=9) and without (n=10) ICDs to evaluate generalizability. The retrained ICD-supplemented model was compared against a non-ICD model using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p<0.05). Dosimetric evaluation was performed for VT-SBRT CS. For VT-SBRT, the ICD-supplemented model achieved average DSC/HD95 of 0.71(0.19)/10.7(22.5)mm respectively, outperforming (p<0.05) the non-ICD model. On CT-SIM with ICDs, average DSC/HD95 were 0.70(0.22)/7.9(5.1)mm respectively, outperforming (p<0.05) the non-ICD model. On CT-SIM without ICDs, the average DSC was 0.74(0.17) (Non-ICD, DSC, 0.75(0.16), p<0.05) and average HD95 was 5.5(3.1)mm (Non-ICD, HD95, 5.3(2.8mm)). For VT-SBRT, CS dose depended on target location, with higher relative dose delivered to the ventricles, tricuspid valve, atrioventricular node, and left coronary arteries than other CS. ICD-supplemented training improved CS segmentation despite metal artifacts without meaningfully degrading non-ICD performance, supporting segmentation and CS-level dosimetry in ICD populations.
ER  -