Parent–teacher support congruence and adolescents’ academic well-being: a response surface analysis
Abstract
BackgroundParental support and teacher support are usually studied as separate predictors of adolescents’ academic functioning, which leaves open whether the correspondence between these two resources carries its own significance. Drawing on ecological systems theory, developmental assets theory, and person–environment fit perspectives, this study examined how the joint configuration of parental and teacher support is associated with adolescents’ academic well-being, and whether expectancy-value motivation statistically accounts for part of this association.MethodsParticipants were 2,492 junior high school students (1,266 girls, 1,224 boys; Mage = 13.04, SD = 0.88) nested within 101 classrooms in China. Multilevel polynomial regression with response surface analysis (RSA) was estimated in 20 multiply imputed datasets. The random-effects structure was selected by likelihood-ratio tests; the retained model, which included a random classroom intercept and a random slope for teacher support, was used for all surface parameters, figures, and mediation analyses. Surface parameters were tested directly, using standard errors from the pooled covariance matrix and a classroom-level cluster bootstrap.ResultsMotivation and well-being were higher when parental and teacher support were jointly high than when both were low (congruence-line slopes a1 = 0.65 and 0.69). The direction of incongruence mattered: at the same average level of support, adolescents whose parental support exceeded their teacher support reported lower motivation and well-being than adolescents with the reverse pattern. For academic well-being, but not for motivation, the surface also curved downward along the line of incongruence (a4 = −0.15), indicating a mismatch penalty whose peak was shifted toward higher teacher than parental support. Expectancy-value motivation statistically transmitted the level and directional components of the surface, but not the mismatch penalty.ConclusionThe level of support, and support from teachers relative to parents, were more consistent correlates of adolescents’ motivation and academic well-being than congruence as such. Because the data are cross-sectional self-reports, the indirect effects are statistical associations, not evidence of a causal mechanism.
Related
- The relationships among achievement motivation health related physical fitness and academic procrastination in adolescents from a multitheoretical perspective
- Development of a teacher-delivered, school-based mental health promotion programme for adolescents in China: a Delphi study.
- A lay teacher-counsellor delivered brief psychological treatment for moderate to severe depression among older adolescents in senior high schools in Ghana (Y-MIND): a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial
- When Standards Protect and Pressure Undermines: A Bayesian and Person-Centred Analysis of Perfectionism, Self-Handicapping, Motivation, and Academic Well-Being in Gifted Adolescents.
- Breakfast on Cognitive Function and Academic Performance in Adolescents
BibTeX
@article{cai2026parentteacher,
title = {{Parent–teacher support congruence and adolescents’ academic well-being: a response surface analysis}},
author = {Lun Cai and Na Li and Dahu Man and Xizheng Xu and Qiang Zhou},
journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1965299},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1965299},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Parent–teacher support congruence and adolescents’ academic well-being: a response surface analysis
AU - Lun Cai
AU - Na Li
AU - Dahu Man
AU - Xizheng Xu
AU - Qiang Zhou
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/04
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1965299
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1965299
AB - BackgroundParental support and teacher support are usually studied as separate predictors of adolescents’ academic functioning, which leaves open whether the correspondence between these two resources carries its own significance. Drawing on ecological systems theory, developmental assets theory, and person–environment fit perspectives, this study examined how the joint configuration of parental and teacher support is associated with adolescents’ academic well-being, and whether expectancy-value motivation statistically accounts for part of this association.MethodsParticipants were 2,492 junior high school students (1,266 girls, 1,224 boys; Mage = 13.04, SD = 0.88) nested within 101 classrooms in China. Multilevel polynomial regression with response surface analysis (RSA) was estimated in 20 multiply imputed datasets. The random-effects structure was selected by likelihood-ratio tests; the retained model, which included a random classroom intercept and a random slope for teacher support, was used for all surface parameters, figures, and mediation analyses. Surface parameters were tested directly, using standard errors from the pooled covariance matrix and a classroom-level cluster bootstrap.ResultsMotivation and well-being were higher when parental and teacher support were jointly high than when both were low (congruence-line slopes a1 = 0.65 and 0.69). The direction of incongruence mattered: at the same average level of support, adolescents whose parental support exceeded their teacher support reported lower motivation and well-being than adolescents with the reverse pattern. For academic well-being, but not for motivation, the surface also curved downward along the line of incongruence (a4 = −0.15), indicating a mismatch penalty whose peak was shifted toward higher teacher than parental support. Expectancy-value motivation statistically transmitted the level and directional components of the surface, but not the mismatch penalty.ConclusionThe level of support, and support from teachers relative to parents, were more consistent correlates of adolescents’ motivation and academic well-being than congruence as such. Because the data are cross-sectional self-reports, the indirect effects are statistical associations, not evidence of a causal mechanism.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -