Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics

Guidelines for setting cut-off scores in AUC (AUC-GUIDE): balancing sensitivity, specificity, and purpose

  1. 1Clinical Research Centre, Institute For Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health Ministry of Health Malaysia, Sarawak General Hospital

Abstract

Determining ideal cut-off scores is a critical step in screening and diagnostic test evaluation. While the Area Under the Curve (AUC) with Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve are frequently reported, these do not directly indicate the best threshold for decision-making. In addition, pursuing an optimal solution might not always be practical. This paper presents a practical guideline for selecting cut-off scores based on AUC values in conjunction with sensitivity, specificity, and intended scientific use. The study outline recommended strategies for different AUC ranges, incorporating realistic considerations and scientific priorities. The framework offers flexibility, including when to prioritize sensitivity, specificity, or balanced performance via Youden's Index and other techniques. This guideline aims to support researchers and clinicians in making evidence-based, transparent, and context-sensitive decisions when interpreting screening or diagnostic accuracy results.

Related

  1. A general-purpose multi-path stacked coupling for stochastic reaction networks
    David F. Anderson, Jingyi Ma
  2. Balancing tautological intersection numbers
    Kefeng Liu, Hao Xu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  3. The infinite sum of the cubes of reciprocal balancing numbers
    Subhasis Panda, Aditya Kumar Dash, Utkal Keshari Dutta
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. An optimal constant for vector balancing with permutations
    Jonathan Niles-Weed, Shay Sadovsky, Jacob Shkrob
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsGeometry & topologyarXiv
  5. Upper Bounds and Fekete–Szegö Problem for Bi-Univalent Functions Involving Bazilevič and λ-Pseudo Functions Related to Lucas-Balancing Polynomials
    Shaymaa Y. Alkufi, Abbas Kareem Wanas, Alina Alb Lupas
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Geometry & topologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{bujang2026guidelines,
  title = {{Guidelines for setting cut-off scores in AUC (AUC-GUIDE): balancing sensitivity, specificity, and purpose}},
  author = {Mohamad Adam Bujang},
  journal = {Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.3389/frma.2026.1808675},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2026.1808675},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Guidelines for setting cut-off scores in AUC (AUC-GUIDE): balancing sensitivity, specificity, and purpose
AU  - Mohamad Adam Bujang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/05
JO  - Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
DO  - 10.3389/frma.2026.1808675
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2026.1808675
AB  - Determining ideal cut-off scores is a critical step in screening and diagnostic test evaluation. While the Area Under the Curve (AUC) with Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve are frequently reported, these do not directly indicate the best threshold for decision-making. In addition, pursuing an optimal solution might not always be practical. This paper presents a practical guideline for selecting cut-off scores based on AUC values in conjunction with sensitivity, specificity, and intended scientific use. The study outline recommended strategies for different AUC ranges, incorporating realistic considerations and scientific priorities. The framework offers flexibility, including when to prioritize sensitivity, specificity, or balanced performance via Youden's Index and other techniques. This guideline aims to support researchers and clinicians in making evidence-based, transparent, and context-sensitive decisions when interpreting screening or diagnostic accuracy results.
SN  - 2504-0537
ER  -