Status, barriers and facilitators of comprehensive abortion care services in rural India: A multicenter mixed-methods study protocol
7 affiliations
- 1Division of Reproductive, Child Health & Nutrition, ICMR, New Delhi, India
- 2ICMR-National Institute of Health Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
- 3Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, Delhi, India
- 4ICMR-National Institute For Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India
- 5ICMR-National Institute of Health Research, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
- 6ICMR – National Institute of Traditional Medicine, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
- 7ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Dibrugarh, Assam, India
Abstract
Background: Unsafe abortion continues to be a significant cause of avoidable maternal morbidity and mortality especially in low- and middle-income countries. Despite India’s permissive Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, operational gaps continue to prevent women from accessing safe abortion services. There is still a dearth of multi-centric mixed-methods research from rural areas on women’s experiences, provider perspectives, and facility readiness. This study aims to assess the status of comprehensive abortion care (CAC) in rural India by evaluating public-sector facility preparedness, provider experiences, care-seeking pathways, and identifying key barriers and facilitators as per CAC guidelines (2023). The findings will guide the development of a preliminary implementation approach (Model 0+) as well as future phases focused on testing, adaptation, and scale up to strengthen CAC availability, quality, and uptake. Methods: This study employs a convergent mixed-methods design across six geographically varied rural blocks in India (North, South, East, West, Central, and Northeast). There will be two participant groups: married women aged 18–49 years who are current, previous, or potential abortion service users, and public health system stakeholders involved in Comprehensive Abortion Care (CAC). A multistage cluster survey will enroll approximately 854 married women per site across 20 clusters. The qualitative component will comprise interviews with women who have had abortions in the last two years and healthcare practitioners, for a total of around 240 interviews. Additionally, 18 focus group discussions with Accredited Social Health Activists and Anganwadi Workers (three per site), will capture frontline worker’s perspectives. Quantitative data will be collected using KoboCollect and analysed using STATA (or an equivalent statistical software). Qualitative data will undergo combined phenomenological and thematic analysis using NVivo or equivalent software. Discussion: This study constitutes the first phase of a multi-stage implementation research programme. The study builds upon national CAC guidelines as a foundation of implementation of “Model 0” for abortion care and assesses their functioning in routine public-sector settings. Insights from women, frontline workers, and providers will inform development of a refined implementation strategy (“Model 0+”) grounded in real-world contexts. This evidence-driven approach is expected to yield a practical, acceptable, and scalable model for subsequent piloting, adaptation, and wider health system uptake.
Related
- A decade of implementing comprehensive child development services in Northwest Iran: a qualitative study of provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators
- Towards a standardised definition of full-time culture and its organisational facilitators and barriers among nursing care staff within Norwegian health services: a Delphi study protocol
- Facilitators and barriers to community-based livestock abortion reporting for Rift Valley Fever surveillance in Uganda: A COM-B analysis
- Perceived barriers and facilitators to medical students participating in volunteer services for older adults with disabilities: a qualitative descriptive study
- Patients' experiences of and adherence to supervised high-intensity physical training integrated into specialised treatment for substance use disorders: study protocol for a qualitative collaborative health services study of facilitators and barriers.
BibTeX
@article{manna2026status,
title = {{Status, barriers and facilitators of comprehensive abortion care services in rural India: A multicenter mixed-methods study protocol}},
author = {Subhanwita Manna and Bijaya Kumar Mishra and Krishna Kant Yadav and Pratibha Dhiman and Smiteerekha Sahoo and Chiranjeet Mishra and Tanveer Rehman and Ranjan Kumar Prusty and Ragini Kulkarni and Mahadev Bhise and Ashok Kumar Pandey and Ravikumar B. S. and Ipsita Pal Bhowmick and Subrata Kumar Palo and Narayana Swamy D. M. and Neha Srivastava and Umaer Alam and Reeta Singh and Manish Barvaliya and Vani Kandpal and Barsha Gadapani Pathak and Reema Mukherjee and Sanghamitra Pati},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358274},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358274},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Status, barriers and facilitators of comprehensive abortion care services in rural India: A multicenter mixed-methods study protocol
AU - Subhanwita Manna
AU - Bijaya Kumar Mishra
AU - Krishna Kant Yadav
AU - Pratibha Dhiman
AU - Smiteerekha Sahoo
AU - Chiranjeet Mishra
AU - Tanveer Rehman
AU - Ranjan Kumar Prusty
AU - Ragini Kulkarni
AU - Mahadev Bhise
AU - Ashok Kumar Pandey
AU - Ravikumar B. S.
AU - Ipsita Pal Bhowmick
AU - Subrata Kumar Palo
AU - Narayana Swamy D. M.
AU - Neha Srivastava
AU - Umaer Alam
AU - Reeta Singh
AU - Manish Barvaliya
AU - Vani Kandpal
AU - Barsha Gadapani Pathak
AU - Reema Mukherjee
AU - Sanghamitra Pati
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/16
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358274
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358274
AB - Background: Unsafe abortion continues to be a significant cause of avoidable maternal morbidity and mortality especially in low- and middle-income countries. Despite India’s permissive Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, operational gaps continue to prevent women from accessing safe abortion services. There is still a dearth of multi-centric mixed-methods research from rural areas on women’s experiences, provider perspectives, and facility readiness. This study aims to assess the status of comprehensive abortion care (CAC) in rural India by evaluating public-sector facility preparedness, provider experiences, care-seeking pathways, and identifying key barriers and facilitators as per CAC guidelines (2023). The findings will guide the development of a preliminary implementation approach (Model 0+) as well as future phases focused on testing, adaptation, and scale up to strengthen CAC availability, quality, and uptake. Methods: This study employs a convergent mixed-methods design across six geographically varied rural blocks in India (North, South, East, West, Central, and Northeast). There will be two participant groups: married women aged 18–49 years who are current, previous, or potential abortion service users, and public health system stakeholders involved in Comprehensive Abortion Care (CAC). A multistage cluster survey will enroll approximately 854 married women per site across 20 clusters. The qualitative component will comprise interviews with women who have had abortions in the last two years and healthcare practitioners, for a total of around 240 interviews. Additionally, 18 focus group discussions with Accredited Social Health Activists and Anganwadi Workers (three per site), will capture frontline worker’s perspectives. Quantitative data will be collected using KoboCollect and analysed using STATA (or an equivalent statistical software). Qualitative data will undergo combined phenomenological and thematic analysis using NVivo or equivalent software. Discussion: This study constitutes the first phase of a multi-stage implementation research programme. The study builds upon national CAC guidelines as a foundation of implementation of “Model 0” for abortion care and assesses their functioning in routine public-sector settings. Insights from women, frontline workers, and providers will inform development of a refined implementation strategy (“Model 0+”) grounded in real-world contexts. This evidence-driven approach is expected to yield a practical, acceptable, and scalable model for subsequent piloting, adaptation, and wider health system uptake.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -