Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Branch-Sensitive Density Increments for k-Configurations

Abstract

We refine the density-increment argument for k-configurations developed by Beker. The point is not to introduce a new inverse theorem, but to retain information that is lost when the graph-counting output is compressed into a single uniform alternative. For the transitive Kk appearing in the k-configuration problem we keep a fixed moment throughout the graph recursion and obtain three genuinely different outputs: a row-degree anomaly, a non-centred grid anomaly, and a centred grid anomaly. The centred case is treated directly through positivity of the associated Gram moments, avoiding the usual unbalancing step. Each output is then routed through the appropriate local Kelley--Meka mechanism with its own density gain, rank cost, and width cost. A weighted iteration budget prevents the most expensive local branches from being charged the maximal number of times. For a finite abelian group G of odd order and A⊆ G of density α, write L=log(2/α) and Λ=L+log(2k). We obtain a lower bound of the form Ppx1,…,xk∈ G ((xi+xj)/2∈ A for all 1≤ i≤ j≤ k) ≥ exp (−CΦ(k,L,Λ)), where Φ(k,L,Λ)=k36L6Λ6+k34L8Λ5+k32L14Λ+k30L16. Consequently, in the Erdős--Moser application one may replace the exponent $68$ in Beker's k-configuration route by $36$; in particular the same reduction yields the sum-free lower bound with every exponent c<1/36.

Related

  1. Quasipolynomial density bounds for K-point configurations in ℤd
    Andrew Lott, Ákos Magyar, Nagendar Reddy Ponagandla
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Energy-Dissipative, High-Order BDF Schemes for Simulating Geometric Flows via Energy Increments
    Zhiqing Pan, Wei Jiang, Jiwei Jia
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  3. Formation of shear bands through discrete localized plastic increments
    Heiner Olbermann, Hidde Schönberger
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. Fully Discrete Active Flux Method based on Transported Acoustic Increments for the Compressible Euler Equations
    Karthik Duraisamy
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingFluid dynamicsarXiv
  5. Singular Atiyah Configurations
    Jan Eickhoff
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{zhi2026branchsensitive,
  title = {{Branch-Sensitive Density Increments for $k$-Configurations}},
  author = {Yao Zhi},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.03750},
  eprint = {2610.03750},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03750},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Branch-Sensitive Density Increments for k-Configurations
AU  - Yao Zhi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.03750
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03750
AB  - We refine the density-increment argument for k-configurations developed by Beker. The point is not to introduce a new inverse theorem, but to retain information that is lost when the graph-counting output is compressed into a single uniform alternative. For the transitive K_k appearing in the k-configuration problem we keep a fixed moment throughout the graph recursion and obtain three genuinely different outputs: a row-degree anomaly, a non-centred grid anomaly, and a centred grid anomaly. The centred case is treated directly through positivity of the associated Gram moments, avoiding the usual unbalancing step. Each output is then routed through the appropriate local Kelley--Meka mechanism with its own density gain, rank cost, and width cost. A weighted iteration budget prevents the most expensive local branches from being charged the maximal number of times. For a finite abelian group G of odd order and A⊆ G of density α, write L=log(2/α) and Λ=L+log(2k). We obtain a lower bound of the form Pp_x_1,…,x_k∈ G ((x_i+x_j)/2∈ A for all 1≤ i≤ j≤ k) ≥ exp (−CΦ(k,L,Λ)), where Φ(k,L,Λ)=k^36L^6Λ^6+k^34L^8Λ^5+k^32L^14Λ+k^30L^16. Consequently, in the Erdős--Moser application one may replace the exponent $68$ in Beker's k-configuration route by $36$; in particular the same reduction yields the sum-free lower bound with every exponent c<1/36.
ER  -