The spatial dynamics of nutrient limitation in communities of generalist predators of crop pests
Abstract
Generalist arthropod predators vitally control crop pests, but their ability to perform this role relies on them obtaining sufficient nutrients within simplified crop environments. Field margins are thought to provide habitat and resources for predators, such as ground beetles, but how far into fields this provision extends is poorly understood. Since arthropod nutrient contents can vary significantly over small spatial scales, resource scarcity within arable monoculture field interiors may drive nutrient limitation, impacting the fitness of natural enemies of crop pests. Integrating field surveys, colorimetric assays and laboratory feeding trials, we investigated how distance into crop fields and crop stage affect nutrient limitation of ground beetles within arable crop fields. We specifically compared the community structure, nutrient contents and nutritional preferences of beetles at different distances into crops, and between crops before and after harvest to determine likely impacts to nutrient limitation. Ground beetle communities and nutrient contents varied with distance into the crop and crop stage, but variation in nutritional preferences in relation to distance into the crop was species-specific and dependent on crop stage. Nutritional feeding trials indicated broad lipid limitation across all samples in the study. These findings indicate taxon-specific variation in the nutritional dynamics of ground beetle communities at different distances into fields, with some species potentially being better adapted to crop interiors and post-harvest landscapes. Increasing in-field proximity to semi-natural habitat through intercropping and similar management strategies could support nutritionally healthier populations of natural enemies with likely benefits to pest suppression.
Related
- Soil Enzyme Activities and Microbial Nutrient Limitation Between Restored Vegetation and Primary Forest on the Loess Plateau
- Limitation of External Nutrient Supply Effects by Iron-Driven Internal Phosphorus Cycling in Semi-Enclosed Coastal Waters: A Case Study of Mikawa Bay
- The Caenorhabditis elegans microbiome impacts microsporidia infection through nutrient limitation and spore inactivation
- Mast fruiting in a large tropical African legume tree species and the mineral nutrient limitation hypothesis
- Intensive pine plantation management shapes infectious agent communities in the generalist rodent Apodemus sylvaticus, with consequences for zoonotic hazard
BibTeX
@misc{smyth2026spatial,
title = {{The spatial dynamics of nutrient limitation in communities of generalist predators of crop pests}},
author = {Annabel Smyth and Raul Costa Pereira and Mia Croft and Jordan Patrick Cuff},
howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.32942/x2f11c},
url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15862/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The spatial dynamics of nutrient limitation in communities of generalist predators of crop pests
AU - Annabel Smyth
AU - Raul Costa Pereira
AU - Mia Croft
AU - Jordan Patrick Cuff
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
PB - EcoEvoRxiv
DO - 10.32942/x2f11c
UR - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15862/
AB - Generalist arthropod predators vitally control crop pests, but their ability to perform this role relies on them obtaining sufficient nutrients within simplified crop environments. Field margins are thought to provide habitat and resources for predators, such as ground beetles, but how far into fields this provision extends is poorly understood. Since arthropod nutrient contents can vary significantly over small spatial scales, resource scarcity within arable monoculture field interiors may drive nutrient limitation, impacting the fitness of natural enemies of crop pests. Integrating field surveys, colorimetric assays and laboratory feeding trials, we investigated how distance into crop fields and crop stage affect nutrient limitation of ground beetles within arable crop fields. We specifically compared the community structure, nutrient contents and nutritional preferences of beetles at different distances into crops, and between crops before and after harvest to determine likely impacts to nutrient limitation. Ground beetle communities and nutrient contents varied with distance into the crop and crop stage, but variation in nutritional preferences in relation to distance into the crop was species-specific and dependent on crop stage. Nutritional feeding trials indicated broad lipid limitation across all samples in the study. These findings indicate taxon-specific variation in the nutritional dynamics of ground beetle communities at different distances into fields, with some species potentially being better adapted to crop interiors and post-harvest landscapes. Increasing in-field proximity to semi-natural habitat through intercropping and similar management strategies could support nutritionally healthier populations of natural enemies with likely benefits to pest suppression.
ER -