Reconstructing the Life History of Double Perforated Ivory Beads from the Swabian Aurignacian: A Combined Traceological and Experimental Approach
Abstract
Aurignacian ivory beads provide valuable insights into ivory-working techniques, labour investment, production organisation, and the symbolic behaviour of Early Upper Palaeolithic people. Although decades of research have led to a detailed understanding of the chaîne opératoire of these iconic beads, systematic approaches for identifying and interpreting manufacturing- and use-related traces remain limited. Using 74 double perforated ivory beads (DPIBs) from Archaeological Horizon IV at Hohle Fels Cave as a case study, we integrate taphonomic, typological, morphometric, and traceological analyses with experimental replication to develop an analytical framework for reconstructing the manufacture and use of archaeological ivory beads. Our results suggest that DPIB production followed a broadly shared production sequence while allowing flexibility in the order and execution of individual manufacturing steps. The archaeological evidence indicates that the beads were produced, used, and discarded on site. Experimental replication further provides a basis for evaluating labour investment and identifying surface modifications associated with manufacture and use. The observed morphological variability may reflect differences in production practices related to variation in skill, individual behaviour, and the involvement of multiple craftspeople. The analytical approach presented here is transferable and can be applied to other archaeological ivory bead assemblages.
Related
- Experimental investigation of creep failure behavior of sandstone with combined pore–fissure defects
- New insight into the eco-friendly synthesis of MgO NPs using olive pomace extract: combined experimental and DFT study for Congo red adsorption
- Mechanistic elucidation and temperature-dependent kinetics of gas phase OH radical reactions with myrtenal: a combined theoretical and experimental investigation
- Reconstructing Significant Wave Height Fields from Sparse Observations Using Virtual Observation Augmentation
- Reconstructing the spatiotemporal distribution of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation using electrical conductivity tomography
BibTeX
@article{guo2026reconstructing,
title = {{Reconstructing the Life History of Double Perforated Ivory Beads from the Swabian Aurignacian: A Combined Traceological and Experimental Approach}},
author = {Shuqin Guo and Marian Vanhaeren and Nicholas Conard and Natasha Singh and Rudolf Walter and Sibylle Wolf},
journal = {Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1007/s10816-026-09818-9},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05768993v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Reconstructing the Life History of Double Perforated Ivory Beads from the Swabian Aurignacian: A Combined Traceological and Experimental Approach
AU - Shuqin Guo
AU - Marian Vanhaeren
AU - Nicholas Conard
AU - Natasha Singh
AU - Rudolf Walter
AU - Sibylle Wolf
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/12
JO - Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
DO - 10.1007/s10816-026-09818-9
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05768993v1
AB - Aurignacian ivory beads provide valuable insights into ivory-working techniques, labour investment, production organisation, and the symbolic behaviour of Early Upper Palaeolithic people. Although decades of research have led to a detailed understanding of the chaîne opératoire of these iconic beads, systematic approaches for identifying and interpreting manufacturing- and use-related traces remain limited. Using 74 double perforated ivory beads (DPIBs) from Archaeological Horizon IV at Hohle Fels Cave as a case study, we integrate taphonomic, typological, morphometric, and traceological analyses with experimental replication to develop an analytical framework for reconstructing the manufacture and use of archaeological ivory beads. Our results suggest that DPIB production followed a broadly shared production sequence while allowing flexibility in the order and execution of individual manufacturing steps. The archaeological evidence indicates that the beads were produced, used, and discarded on site. Experimental replication further provides a basis for evaluating labour investment and identifying surface modifications associated with manufacture and use. The observed morphological variability may reflect differences in production practices related to variation in skill, individual behaviour, and the involvement of multiple craftspeople. The analytical approach presented here is transferable and can be applied to other archaeological ivory bead assemblages.
SN - 1072-5369
SN - 1573-7764
ER -