Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in genetics

Recurrent CNVs in constitutional CMA: a ClinGen-anchored single-center postnatal and prenatal experience

  1. 1Department of Genetics and Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, Trakya University , ,
  2. 2Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University , ,

Abstract

Background

Recurrent copy-number variants (CNVs) mediated by low-copy repeats or segmental duplications constitute an important subset of constitutional chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) findings. Although ACMG/ClinGen standards have improved CNV classification, the burden of recurrent CNVs is not routinely quantified as a canonical, interval-matched, direction-specific category in clinical CMA output. We applied a strict ClinGen-anchored framework to quantify recurrent genomic disorder intervals in a consecutive single-center CMA series.Methods

Constitutional array-CGH and SNP-array records from a single center (2014-2026) were retrospectively reviewed, including 1,661 postnatal probands and 401 prenatal samples, with aneuploidies excluded. Recurrent regions were defined using the ClinGen Dosage Sensitivity Map and restricted to canonical intervals presumed to be mediated by non-allelic homologous recombination. Assignment required breakpoint concordance with the flanking low-copy repeat blocks and canonical interval size; terminal, unbalanced, and atypical imbalances were excluded. All records were re-curated against a single ClinGen release, with earlier GRCh37 coordinates converted to GRCh38.Results

Pathogenic or likely pathogenic findings were identified in 278/1,661 postnatal probands (16.74%) and 28/401 prenatal samples (6.98%). Recurrent CNVs were detected in 92/1,661 postnatal (5.54%, 95% CI 4.54-6.74) and 17/401 prenatal cases (4.24%, 95% CI 2.66-6.68). Pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs were found in 66/92 postnatal (71.74%) and 7/17 prenatal carriers (41.18%); the remaining findings were of uncertain significance or benign. Pathogenic recurrent CNVs thus accounted for 66/278 (23.74%) of postnatal and 7/28 (25.00%) of prenatal non-aneuploid pathogenic findings. Proximal 22q11.21 and 16p11.2 were most frequent. Deletions predominated postnatally (64/93, 68.82%); duplications comprised 11/17 (64.71%) of prenatal recurrent CNVs. Postnatal pathogenic recurrent-CNV yield was 58/1,589 (3.65%) in phenotype-driven testing (no suspected recurrent-CNV syndrome) and 6/19 (31.58%) with syndrome-specific suspicion; neurodevelopmental referrals contributed most cases.Conclusion

ClinGen-defined recurrent CNVs were a substantial component of constitutional CMA findings. However, only about three-quarters of postnatal and fewer than half of prenatal carriers harbored pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs, indicating that a recurrent-region label alone is insufficient for interpretation. These findings support region- and dosage-specific reporting, with evidence-based classification distinguished from clinical interpretation, particularly for prenatal findings and inherited duplications, where the same label may have different patient-specific implications.

Related

  1. Prenatal Diagnosis and Postnatal Follow‐Up of 19 Fetuses With 16p13.11 Microduplication in a Cohort of 12,038 Pregnancies From South Zhejiang
    Xiaoxiao Lv, Shufei Li, Lili Zhou +6
    Molecular genetics & genomic medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
  2. The human-specific gene FRMPD2B couples postnatal experience to the expansion of cortical connectivity
    E. Christopoulou, J. Zamith, P. Bonadonna +9
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Enrichment of In Utero Rhythmic Experience Promotes Postnatal Visuospatial Attention
    Martina Arioli, Valentina Silvestri, Melissa Savoldi +4
    Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePMCEurope PMC
  4. Postnatal sensorimotor experience causally shapes hemispheric specialization across motor and language networks
    Y. Liu, J. Sun, L. Zhao +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Dynamic tissue-specific mosaicism in constitutional non-supernumerary ring chromosome 21 with a Down syndrome-like phenotype: a case report and genotype-phenotype analysis
    Daniel Martínez Anaya, Alejandro Zinser Sainas, Marelen Cruz Cruz +6
    Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{satkın2026recurrent,
  title = {{Recurrent CNVs in constitutional CMA: a ClinGen-anchored single-center postnatal and prenatal experience}},
  author = {Nihan Bilge Satkın and Engin Atlı and Sinem Yalcintepe and Kübra Müge Çelik and Hakan Gürkan},
  journal = {Frontiers in genetics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fgene.2026.1960791},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13727316},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Recurrent CNVs in constitutional CMA: a ClinGen-anchored single-center postnatal and prenatal experience
AU  - Nihan Bilge Satkın
AU  - Engin Atlı
AU  - Sinem Yalcintepe
AU  - Kübra Müge Çelik
AU  - Hakan Gürkan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Frontiers in genetics
DO  - 10.3389/fgene.2026.1960791
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13727316
AB  - Background  Recurrent copy-number variants (CNVs) mediated by low-copy repeats or segmental duplications constitute an important subset of constitutional chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) findings. Although ACMG/ClinGen standards have improved CNV classification, the burden of recurrent CNVs is not routinely quantified as a canonical, interval-matched, direction-specific category in clinical CMA output. We applied a strict ClinGen-anchored framework to quantify recurrent genomic disorder intervals in a consecutive single-center CMA series.Methods  Constitutional array-CGH and SNP-array records from a single center (2014-2026) were retrospectively reviewed, including 1,661 postnatal probands and 401 prenatal samples, with aneuploidies excluded. Recurrent regions were defined using the ClinGen Dosage Sensitivity Map and restricted to canonical intervals presumed to be mediated by non-allelic homologous recombination. Assignment required breakpoint concordance with the flanking low-copy repeat blocks and canonical interval size; terminal, unbalanced, and atypical imbalances were excluded. All records were re-curated against a single ClinGen release, with earlier GRCh37 coordinates converted to GRCh38.Results  Pathogenic or likely pathogenic findings were identified in 278/1,661 postnatal probands (16.74%) and 28/401 prenatal samples (6.98%). Recurrent CNVs were detected in 92/1,661 postnatal (5.54%, 95% CI 4.54-6.74) and 17/401 prenatal cases (4.24%, 95% CI 2.66-6.68). Pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs were found in 66/92 postnatal (71.74%) and 7/17 prenatal carriers (41.18%); the remaining findings were of uncertain significance or benign. Pathogenic recurrent CNVs thus accounted for 66/278 (23.74%) of postnatal and 7/28 (25.00%) of prenatal non-aneuploid pathogenic findings. Proximal 22q11.21 and 16p11.2 were most frequent. Deletions predominated postnatally (64/93, 68.82%); duplications comprised 11/17 (64.71%) of prenatal recurrent CNVs. Postnatal pathogenic recurrent-CNV yield was 58/1,589 (3.65%) in phenotype-driven testing (no suspected recurrent-CNV syndrome) and 6/19 (31.58%) with syndrome-specific suspicion; neurodevelopmental referrals contributed most cases.Conclusion  ClinGen-defined recurrent CNVs were a substantial component of constitutional CMA findings. However, only about three-quarters of postnatal and fewer than half of prenatal carriers harbored pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs, indicating that a recurrent-region label alone is insufficient for interpretation. These findings support region- and dosage-specific reporting, with evidence-based classification distinguished from clinical interpretation, particularly for prenatal findings and inherited duplications, where the same label may have different patient-specific implications.
SN  - 1664-8021
ER  -