Infection prevention and control procedures in nursing homes in the piedmont region of Italy: results from two regional surveys (2021-2024).
6 affiliations
- 1Dipartimento di Prevenzione, ASL TO5, Moncalieri, Italy.
- 2Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
- 3Settore Residenzialità, ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy.
- 4DIRMEI: Dipartimento Interaziendale Funzionale A Valenza Regionale "Malattie Ed Emergenze Infettive", Turin, Italy.
- 5Regione Piemonte - Direzione Sanità- Prevenzione, Sanità Pubblica Veterinaria e Sicurezza Alimentare, Turin, Italy.
- 6Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. [email protected].
Abstract
Background
Infection prevention and control (IPC) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is essential to reduce the burden of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This paper describes the development of standardized IPC procedures through a stakeholder-informed approach, and integrates results from two regional surveys conducted in Piedmont (first survey 2021-2022; second survey 2024) which assessed the reported availability of written procedure documents in nursing homes and, subsequently, the uptake and perceived utility of the developed standardized procedures.Methods
Two anonymous cross-sectional surveys targeted all nursing homes registered in the Piedmont regional healthcare census. The first survey (December 2021-April 2022) assessed the reported inclusion of 16 IPC procedure domains in facility manuals and the date of last revision. Based on these findings, standardized IPC procedure documents were developed by the University of Turin in collaboration with DIRMEI, regional public health authorities and IPC stakeholders, and were made available online in 2023. A second survey (August 2024) assessed reported uptake, perceived adequacy, missing but useful procedures and overall satisfaction. Descriptive statistics were used.Results
436/780 facilities responded to the first survey (55.9%). High availability of written procedure documents was reported for hand hygiene (99.1%), isolation for COVID-19 (99.8%) and cleaning/sanitation (98.9%). Lower availability was reported for sterilization (46.2%), bloodstream infection prevention (45.9%), and management of colonized/infected patients for alert organisms (62.0%). Revision dates varied, with many critical procedures updated predominantly in 2020-2022. After dissemination of standardized procedures, 305 facilities (39.1%) participated in the second survey: 99.7% found them adequate, 31.1% reported possessing all procedures already, and 89% provided an overall positive judgment. The most frequently requested/adopted procedures were vaccination prophylaxis (33.8%), laboratory sample management (31.8%), TB control (26.2%) and catheter management (22.0%).Conclusions
This regional initiative identified heterogeneity in IPC procedural documentation in nursing homes and documented high perceived adequacy and usefulness of standardized procedure documents after dissemination. These findings support harmonized regional resources as a structural component of IPC governance in LTCFs. However, the surveys did not assess implementation fidelity, staff adherence, audits, HAI rates, antimicrobial use or AMR outcomes; future work should incorporate objective implementation and outcome indicators.
Related
- Infection prevention training and adherence to infection control practices in childcare and early childhood education facilities during COVID-19: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan
- Infection prevention and control considerations in invasive group A streptococcus outbreaks.
- Global Readiness for AI and Digital Health in Infection Prevention and Control
- EpiFAMU: an epidemiological tool for monitoring farm-level factors essential to antimicrobial use surveillance and infection prevention and control programs in poultry production systems in Zambia—development and application
- Implementation uptake and healthcare worker adherence following a World Health Organization-aligned multi-modal infection prevention and control intervention in Bangladeshi tertiary hospitals: a multi-centre comparative study.
BibTeX
@article{bordino2026infection,
title = {{Infection prevention and control procedures in nursing homes in the piedmont region of Italy: results from two regional surveys (2021-2024).}},
author = {Valerio Bordino and Vittoria Nunziata and Anna Laura Busca and Giuseppina Dassio and Daniela Granatiero and Lorenza Ferrara and Bartolomeo Griglio and Carla M Zotti and Costanza Vicentini},
journal = {Antimicrobial resistance and infection control},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s13756-026-01796-7},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907937},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Infection prevention and control procedures in nursing homes in the piedmont region of Italy: results from two regional surveys (2021-2024).
AU - Valerio Bordino
AU - Vittoria Nunziata
AU - Anna Laura Busca
AU - Giuseppina Dassio
AU - Daniela Granatiero
AU - Lorenza Ferrara
AU - Bartolomeo Griglio
AU - Carla M Zotti
AU - Costanza Vicentini
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Antimicrobial resistance and infection control
DO - 10.1186/s13756-026-01796-7
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907937
AB - Background Infection prevention and control (IPC) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is essential to reduce the burden of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This paper describes the development of standardized IPC procedures through a stakeholder-informed approach, and integrates results from two regional surveys conducted in Piedmont (first survey 2021-2022; second survey 2024) which assessed the reported availability of written procedure documents in nursing homes and, subsequently, the uptake and perceived utility of the developed standardized procedures.Methods Two anonymous cross-sectional surveys targeted all nursing homes registered in the Piedmont regional healthcare census. The first survey (December 2021-April 2022) assessed the reported inclusion of 16 IPC procedure domains in facility manuals and the date of last revision. Based on these findings, standardized IPC procedure documents were developed by the University of Turin in collaboration with DIRMEI, regional public health authorities and IPC stakeholders, and were made available online in 2023. A second survey (August 2024) assessed reported uptake, perceived adequacy, missing but useful procedures and overall satisfaction. Descriptive statistics were used.Results 436/780 facilities responded to the first survey (55.9%). High availability of written procedure documents was reported for hand hygiene (99.1%), isolation for COVID-19 (99.8%) and cleaning/sanitation (98.9%). Lower availability was reported for sterilization (46.2%), bloodstream infection prevention (45.9%), and management of colonized/infected patients for alert organisms (62.0%). Revision dates varied, with many critical procedures updated predominantly in 2020-2022. After dissemination of standardized procedures, 305 facilities (39.1%) participated in the second survey: 99.7% found them adequate, 31.1% reported possessing all procedures already, and 89% provided an overall positive judgment. The most frequently requested/adopted procedures were vaccination prophylaxis (33.8%), laboratory sample management (31.8%), TB control (26.2%) and catheter management (22.0%).Conclusions This regional initiative identified heterogeneity in IPC procedural documentation in nursing homes and documented high perceived adequacy and usefulness of standardized procedure documents after dissemination. These findings support harmonized regional resources as a structural component of IPC governance in LTCFs. However, the surveys did not assess implementation fidelity, staff adherence, audits, HAI rates, antimicrobial use or AMR outcomes; future work should incorporate objective implementation and outcome indicators.
SN - 2047-2994
ER -