Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in aging neuroscience

Heterogeneous progression of AT(N) biomarkers in data-driven subtypes of Alzheimer's disease.

  1. 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  2. 2Department of Nursing, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Abstract

Background

Alzheimer's disease (AD) exhibits substantial heterogeneity in brain atrophy patterns and progression rates. Data-driven subtyping based on the Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn) model has identified distinct MRI-derived subtypes, but the longitudinal dynamics of these subtypes within the AT(N) framework remain unknown.Methods

This study included 1,576 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) with at least two visits. SuStaIn was applied to volumetric measurements of 11 brain regions to identify imaging-based subtypes. Within each subtype, we fitted a Bayesian latent time longitudinal joint mixed-effects model incorporating six biomarkers: amyloid PET (A), CSF p-tau (T), hippocampal volume, cingulate volume, thalamic volume (N), and ADAS-Cog13 (X), with APOE ε4 as a covariate.Results

The three subtypes exhibited distinctly different longitudinal patterns. Subtype 1 showed early elevation of amyloid, followed by a sharp decline in hippocampal volume, which was tightly coupled with cognitive deterioration. Subtype 2 featured early involvement of cortical regions such as the cingulate cortex, with hippocampal changes occurring at a similar timing to Subtype 1 but accompanied by earlier cortical and thalamic involvement. Subtype 3 exhibited early rapid hippocampal atrophy that later plateaued, and demonstrated the strongest hippocampus-cognition coupling. The association of APOE ε4 with biomarker trajectories was subtype-dependent: its effect estimates were largest for amyloid and p-tau in Subtype 1, whereas in Subtype 3 the effect estimates were significant for nearly all biomarkers, with the largest estimate for cognition.Conclusion

This study demonstrates that AD subtypes defined by spatial atrophy patterns also differ fundamentally in temporal biomarker dynamics and APOE ε4 association, supporting subtype-stratified modeling of disease progression.

Related

  1. Dynamic remodeling of microglial responses in Alzheimer's disease: heterogeneous states, spatiotemporal progression, and immunometabolic dysregulation.
    Simin Han, Shanshan Wang, Jingjing Liu +3
    Frontiers in cell and developmental biologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMCPMC
  2. Multi-omics profiling uncovers diagnostic biomarker panel, progression-associated subtypes, and prognostic signature in pediatric mitochondrial disease
    Xiaoting Lou, Zhehui Chen, Yuwei Zhou +11
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  3. A neurocognitive speech taxonomy for voice biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease
    B. Henley, Z. Yang, J. Sober +3
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurologymedRxiv
  4. No evidence that serum metabolite slopes improve held-out prediction of clinical progression in the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative
    Tia Warrick, Manali Misra, Stephen Kataria +2
    Frontiers in aging neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Sex‐specific brain reserve and progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease dementia
    Xulin Liu, Sterre C. M. de Boer, Maria Carmela Tartaglia
    Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's AssociationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{teng2026heterogeneous,
  title = {{Heterogeneous progression of AT(N) biomarkers in data-driven subtypes of Alzheimer's disease.}},
  author = {Zhiwei Teng and Mengyun Hu and Zhongwei Zhang and Mingqi Zhou and Ping Yin and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative},
  journal = {Frontiers in aging neuroscience},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fnagi.2026.1902282},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948157},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Heterogeneous progression of AT(N) biomarkers in data-driven subtypes of Alzheimer's disease.
AU  - Zhiwei Teng
AU  - Mengyun Hu
AU  - Zhongwei Zhang
AU  - Mingqi Zhou
AU  - Ping Yin
AU  - Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Frontiers in aging neuroscience
DO  - 10.3389/fnagi.2026.1902282
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948157
AB  - Background  Alzheimer's disease (AD) exhibits substantial heterogeneity in brain atrophy patterns and progression rates. Data-driven subtyping based on the Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn) model has identified distinct MRI-derived subtypes, but the longitudinal dynamics of these subtypes within the AT(N) framework remain unknown.Methods  This study included 1,576 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) with at least two visits. SuStaIn was applied to volumetric measurements of 11 brain regions to identify imaging-based subtypes. Within each subtype, we fitted a Bayesian latent time longitudinal joint mixed-effects model incorporating six biomarkers: amyloid PET (A), CSF p-tau (T), hippocampal volume, cingulate volume, thalamic volume (N), and ADAS-Cog13 (X), with APOE ε4 as a covariate.Results  The three subtypes exhibited distinctly different longitudinal patterns. Subtype 1 showed early elevation of amyloid, followed by a sharp decline in hippocampal volume, which was tightly coupled with cognitive deterioration. Subtype 2 featured early involvement of cortical regions such as the cingulate cortex, with hippocampal changes occurring at a similar timing to Subtype 1 but accompanied by earlier cortical and thalamic involvement. Subtype 3 exhibited early rapid hippocampal atrophy that later plateaued, and demonstrated the strongest hippocampus-cognition coupling. The association of APOE ε4 with biomarker trajectories was subtype-dependent: its effect estimates were largest for amyloid and p-tau in Subtype 1, whereas in Subtype 3 the effect estimates were significant for nearly all biomarkers, with the largest estimate for cognition.Conclusion  This study demonstrates that AD subtypes defined by spatial atrophy patterns also differ fundamentally in temporal biomarker dynamics and APOE ε4 association, supporting subtype-stratified modeling of disease progression.
SN  - 1663-4365
ER  -