Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Offline vs Real-Time Validation and Performance Assessment of Heimdall Detection Pipeline for Fast Radio Bursts

Abstract

Data rates from current radio telescopes are of ∼O(10)PB/y and we expect a growth of an order of magnitude for future radio telescopes, e.g. SKA. Coping with these data flows requires a paradigm change in data management: building pipelines with intense I/O between their modules (offline mode) is becoming unsustainable, leading to a transition to a real-time paradigm, where data are moved to RAM, e.g.,through PSRDADA ring buffers. Our objective is to obtain a compact pipeline to efficiently manage data in the real-time flow, while minimizing HPC resources. We employ Heimdall, an open source detection pipeline that performs incoherent de-dispersion, to detect single pulses in radio astronomy data, such as FRBs, astrophysical signals whose origin has not been completely explained. Heimdall currently processes a single beam on a single GPU and can operate both in offline and real-time modes, reading in input either a SIGPROC filterbank file or a PSRDADA ring buffer. We run a test pipeline with data collected from 16 cylinders of the NS arm of the Northern Cross radio telescope near Medicina, both in offline and real-time modes, to compare the obtained results and performance. To corroborate these tests, we employ different input data and explore the problem's parameter space. PSRDADA and SIGPROC results generally agree within 3% for the most important quantities characterizing a FRB (TOA and DM) and within 10% for the SNR. Execution times in PSRDADA mode stay in the real-time flow for most runs from data containing true FRBs but they are still generally comparable with SIGPROC mode in this testbed setup. This test provides an important preliminary comparison in terms of accuracy and performance: this work is functional and preparatory for the next integration of the beamformer with the Heimdall pipeline, having the same logical structure as the test pipeline, work already in progress.

Related

  1. The EDGES Analysis Pipeline: Description and Validation
    Steven G. Murray, Nivedita Mahesh, Akshatha K. Vydula +7
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  2. The Wavelet Detection Filter: a real time unmodeled pipeline for gravitational wave transients, ranking coincidences with a graph neural network
    Elena Cuoco
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textInstrumentation & methodsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  3. A Fast and Scalable Transformer Pipeline for Binary Black Hole Detection
    Chayan Chatterjee, Abigail Petulante, Haowei Fu +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  4. MADGRAV: a multilevel anomaly-detection pipeline for gravitational-wave searches applied to LIGO data
    Gianluca Inguglia, Huw Haigh, Ulyana Dupletsa +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. Making Euclid VIS Imaging AI-Ready: A Scalable Pipeline for Morphology, Anomaly Detection, and Similarity Search
    Jinhui Xie, Yunfei Xu, Zhen Zhang +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{cesare2026offline,
  title = {{Offline vs Real-Time Validation and Performance Assessment of Heimdall Detection Pipeline for Fast Radio Bursts}},
  author = {Valentina Cesare and Giovanni Naldi and Francesco Fiori and Andrea Geminardi and Adrian De Barro and Alessio Magro and Hayley Camilleri},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.20635},
  eprint = {2609.20635},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20635},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Offline vs Real-Time Validation and Performance Assessment of Heimdall Detection Pipeline for Fast Radio Bursts
AU  - Valentina Cesare
AU  - Giovanni Naldi
AU  - Francesco Fiori
AU  - Andrea Geminardi
AU  - Adrian De Barro
AU  - Alessio Magro
AU  - Hayley Camilleri
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.20635
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20635
AB  - Data rates from current radio telescopes are of ∼O(10)PB/y and we expect a growth of an order of magnitude for future radio telescopes, e.g. SKA. Coping with these data flows requires a paradigm change in data management: building pipelines with intense I/O between their modules (offline mode) is becoming unsustainable, leading to a transition to a real-time paradigm, where data are moved to RAM, e.g.,through PSRDADA ring buffers. Our objective is to obtain a compact pipeline to efficiently manage data in the real-time flow, while minimizing HPC resources. We employ Heimdall, an open source detection pipeline that performs incoherent de-dispersion, to detect single pulses in radio astronomy data, such as FRBs, astrophysical signals whose origin has not been completely explained. Heimdall currently processes a single beam on a single GPU and can operate both in offline and real-time modes, reading in input either a SIGPROC filterbank file or a PSRDADA ring buffer. We run a test pipeline with data collected from 16 cylinders of the NS arm of the Northern Cross radio telescope near Medicina, both in offline and real-time modes, to compare the obtained results and performance. To corroborate these tests, we employ different input data and explore the problem's parameter space. PSRDADA and SIGPROC results generally agree within 3% for the most important quantities characterizing a FRB (TOA and DM) and within 10% for the SNR. Execution times in PSRDADA mode stay in the real-time flow for most runs from data containing true FRBs but they are still generally comparable with SIGPROC mode in this testbed setup. This test provides an important preliminary comparison in terms of accuracy and performance: this work is functional and preparatory for the next integration of the beamformer with the Heimdall pipeline, having the same logical structure as the test pipeline, work already in progress.
ER  -