Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Finite Quantum Engineering Thermodynamics

Abstract

A useful thermodynamic model predicts what a device will do without tracking its full microscopic state. For a finite quantum working medium, the difficult question is which quantities should actually be measured. We develop a task-based method that keeps exact energy accounting separate from calibrated macroscopic prediction. Operator geometry identifies what a measured record determines and bounds what remains uncertain. We then compare direct measurements of dynamical observables with earlier measurements of the same coarse record, selecting the representation together with its measurement cost. A Bose--Hubbard example yields a compact response table tested over a continuous operating region and on unseen microscopic trajectories. A driven Ising chain shows why history is not always the cheaper choice. The result is a way to turn detailed quantum dynamics into a small, reusable, and explicitly qualified thermodynamic description.

Related

  1. Quantum gravity phenomenology in quadrupolar Bose-Einstein condensates: Finite-temperature thermodynamics and projected bounds
    Asma Tahar Taiba, Abdelaali Boudjemaa
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCondensed matterarXiv
  2. Optimizing optimal transport: Role of final distributions in finite-time thermodynamics
    Kaito Tojo, Rihito Nagase, Ken Funo +1
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedPublisher termsStatistical & nonlinear physicsCrossref
  3. From lattice QCD thermodynamics to an effective quasiparticle description of gluonic matter at finite temperature
    Cheng-Gang Guo, La-Yuan Peng, Zhen-Yan Lu +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsNuclear physicsarXiv
  4. Quantum-Coherent Thermodynamics: Leaf Typicality via Minimum-Variance Foliation
    Maurizio Fagotti
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral physicsHAL
  5. Second Law of Thermodynamics in Closed Quantum Many-Body Systems
    Yuuya Chiba, Yasushi Yoneta, Ryusuke Hamazaki +1
    PRX QuantumPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Statistical & nonlinear physicsAPS
BibTeX
@misc{ahmadi2026finite,
  title = {{Finite Quantum Engineering Thermodynamics}},
  author = {Borhan Ahmadi},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.13511},
  eprint = {2610.13511},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13511},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Finite Quantum Engineering Thermodynamics
AU  - Borhan Ahmadi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.13511
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13511
AB  - A useful thermodynamic model predicts what a device will do without tracking its full microscopic state. For a finite quantum working medium, the difficult question is which quantities should actually be measured. We develop a task-based method that keeps exact energy accounting separate from calibrated macroscopic prediction. Operator geometry identifies what a measured record determines and bounds what remains uncertain. We then compare direct measurements of dynamical observables with earlier measurements of the same coarse record, selecting the representation together with its measurement cost. A Bose--Hubbard example yields a compact response table tested over a continuous operating region and on unseen microscopic trajectories. A driven Ising chain shows why history is not always the cheaper choice. The result is a way to turn detailed quantum dynamics into a small, reusable, and explicitly qualified thermodynamic description.
ER  -