Effect of the interfacial continuity on the elastic full-waveform inversion
Abstract
Full-waveform inversion (FWI) routinely assumes welded interfaces between subsurface layers, yet many geological and engineering targets including karst cavities, fractures, and unbonded soil-structure contacts exhibit interfacial slip. We show that this modelling assumption is not merely a geometric detail but introduces a systematic bias in the recovered physical parameters. Using a finite-element full-waveform-inversion framework implemented in FEniCS, we compare two interfacial treatments: a standard continuous Galerkin (CG) formulation that enforces welded continuity, and a discontinuous Galerkin (DG) formulation based on Nitsche's method that permits tangential slip at material boundaries. A synthetic "inversion crime" cross-test on a two-dimensional elastic inclusion model demonstrates that the CG solver absorbs the interfacial slip effects through biased density estimates, achieving a numerically lower misfit at the cost of parameter accuracy. The DG formulation, by contrast, maintains physical consistency and recovers more accurate parameter values. Our results highlight the need for practitioners to carefully consider interfacial continuity assumptions when inverting seismic data from environments where welded boundary conditions may not hold.
Related
- Characterization of icequake mechanisms on the Argentière glacier by 3-D elastic full waveform inversion
- A new-generation multiparameter elastic model of the crust and upper mantle of the Greater Alpine area and the Apennines using teleseismic Full Waveform Inversion: data, method and models
- Seismic imaging of the crust and upper mantle beneath Taiwan using full-waveform inversion of teleseismic body waves
- Uncertainty Quantification in Full Waveform Inversion with Gradient Flows in Probability Space
- Full Waveform Inversion with a Learned Preconditioner
BibTeX
@misc{giannopoulou2026effect,
title = {{Effect of the interfacial continuity on the elastic full-waveform inversion}},
author = {Ourania Giannopoulou},
howpublished = {EarthArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31223/x52f75},
url = {https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/14721/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Effect of the interfacial continuity on the elastic full-waveform inversion
AU - Ourania Giannopoulou
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/01
PB - EarthArXiv
DO - 10.31223/x52f75
UR - https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/14721/
AB - Full-waveform inversion (FWI) routinely assumes welded interfaces between subsurface layers, yet many geological and engineering targets including karst cavities, fractures, and unbonded soil-structure contacts exhibit interfacial slip. We show that this modelling assumption is not merely a geometric detail but introduces a systematic bias in the recovered physical parameters. Using a finite-element full-waveform-inversion framework implemented in FEniCS, we compare two interfacial treatments: a standard continuous Galerkin (CG) formulation that enforces welded continuity, and a discontinuous Galerkin (DG) formulation based on Nitsche's method that permits tangential slip at material boundaries. A synthetic "inversion crime" cross-test on a two-dimensional elastic inclusion model demonstrates that the CG solver absorbs the interfacial slip effects through biased density estimates, achieving a numerically lower misfit at the cost of parameter accuracy. The DG formulation, by contrast, maintains physical consistency and recovers more accurate parameter values. Our results highlight the need for practitioners to carefully consider interfacial continuity assumptions when inverting seismic data from environments where welded boundary conditions may not hold.
ER -