Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYEnergy & Fuels

Permeability and Compressibility of “Seal” Sediment Overlying the B1 Sand Gas Hydrate Reservoir: Hydrate 02 Geo Data Well, Prudhoe Bay Unit, Alaska North Slope

  1. 1U.S. Geological Survey , , ,
  2. 2National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) , ,

Abstract

An important element in evaluating the viability of extracting methane from a gas hydrate-bearing reservoir is establishing the effectiveness of the overlying bounding sediment as a seal to prevent gas loss, to enable effective depressurization, and to prevent fluid from entering the reservoir during production. This laboratory study presents results for index properties (e.g., grain density, grain size, and liquid limit), compressibility and swelling indices, and permeability measurements on sediment overlying the gas hydrate-bearing reservoir that was the target of the recent JOGMEC-DOE-USGS collaborative gas hydrate production testing project on the Alaska North Slope (ANS). Sediment analyzed in this study was collected during pressure coring operations in the HYDRATE 02 Geo Data Well (GDW). The ∼6.1 m sediment interval recovered in Cores 13P and 14P (878.74–884.88 m measured depth, MD) exhibited heterogeneous sedimentologic characteristics at the centimeter scale, with sediments ranging from clay to thin silty-sand lithologies. Permeability measurements and index-property correlations indicate the interval’s overall in situ vertical permeability ranges from 0.2 to 3.6 microdarcy (μD). Results for compressibility (CC = 0.255 ± 0.02) and swelling index (CS = 0.04 ± 0.01) are consistent with estimates based on mineralogy and liquid limit correlations. Based on the measured compressibility, the ∼3 MPa increase in effective stress during the stable phase of depressurization-induced production is anticipated to have imposed 2.43 cm of compaction per meter in the reservoir overburden, reducing permeability by ∼36%. The overburden sediment’s low in situ permeability (3 to 4 orders of magnitude below permeabilities measured in the gas hydrate-bearing part of the B1 sand (unit B)) suggests the B1 sand′s overburden provides an effective seal. Such a seal promotes efficient production by limiting fluid flow into the reservoir during depressurization-induced gas hydrate dissociation.

Related

  1. Natural gas hydrate exploitation with reservoir stimulation technology: Status and perspectives
    Lin Dong, Yongchao Zhang, Yiqun Zhang
    ADVANCES IN GEO-ENERGY RESEARCHPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text6 citedEnvironmental chemistryOpenAlex
  2. Alaska North Slope HYDRATE 02 Geo Data Well Multicomponent Inversion and NMR Log and Core Analysis of the B1 Sand Gas Hydrate Reservoir
    Timothy S. Collett, Niranjan Aryal, Seth S. Haines +10
    Energy & FuelsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND5 citedEnvironmental chemistryOpenAlex
  3. Production of Secondary Microbial Methane from a Gas Hydrate-Bearing Reservoir at the HYDRATE P1 Production Test Well (PTW-1) on the Alaskan North Slope
    J. Pohlman, Michael A. Casso, Lee-Gray Boze +8
    Energy & FuelsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text7 citedEnvironmental chemistryOpenAlex
  4. Multiphysical Responses of a Gas Hydrate Reservoir to Extended-Duration Gas Production on the Alaska North Slope
    Satoshi Ohtsuki, Yutaro Arima, Yusuke Takai +10
    Energy & FuelsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND9 citedEnvironmental chemistryOpenAlex
  5. Framework-Templated Single Clathrate Hydrate Cages in Metal–Organic Frameworks
    Jihan Kim
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
BibTeX
@article{garcia2026permeability,
  title = {{Permeability and Compressibility of “Seal” Sediment Overlying the B1 Sand Gas Hydrate Reservoir: Hydrate 02 Geo Data Well, Prudhoe Bay Unit, Alaska North Slope}},
  author = {Adrian Garcia and William F. Waite and Stephen C. Phillips and Jun Yoneda and Akihiro Hiruta and Timothy S. Collett},
  journal = {Energy \& Fuels},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c04831},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c04831},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Permeability and Compressibility of “Seal” Sediment Overlying the B1 Sand Gas Hydrate Reservoir: Hydrate 02 Geo Data Well, Prudhoe Bay Unit, Alaska North Slope
AU  - Adrian Garcia
AU  - William F. Waite
AU  - Stephen C. Phillips
AU  - Jun Yoneda
AU  - Akihiro Hiruta
AU  - Timothy S. Collett
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/10
JO  - Energy & Fuels
DO  - 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c04831
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c04831
AB  - An important element in evaluating the viability of extracting methane from a gas hydrate-bearing reservoir is establishing the effectiveness of the overlying bounding sediment as a seal to prevent gas loss, to enable effective depressurization, and to prevent fluid from entering the reservoir during production. This laboratory study presents results for index properties (e.g., grain density, grain size, and liquid limit), compressibility and swelling indices, and permeability measurements on sediment overlying the gas hydrate-bearing reservoir that was the target of the recent JOGMEC-DOE-USGS collaborative gas hydrate production testing project on the Alaska North Slope (ANS). Sediment analyzed in this study was collected during pressure coring operations in the HYDRATE 02 Geo Data Well (GDW). The ∼6.1 m sediment interval recovered in Cores 13P and 14P (878.74–884.88 m measured depth, MD) exhibited heterogeneous sedimentologic characteristics at the centimeter scale, with sediments ranging from clay to thin silty-sand lithologies. Permeability measurements and index-property correlations indicate the interval’s overall in situ vertical permeability ranges from 0.2 to 3.6 microdarcy (μD). Results for compressibility (CC = 0.255 ± 0.02) and swelling index (CS = 0.04 ± 0.01) are consistent with estimates based on mineralogy and liquid limit correlations. Based on the measured compressibility, the ∼3 MPa increase in effective stress during the stable phase of depressurization-induced production is anticipated to have imposed 2.43 cm of compaction per meter in the reservoir overburden, reducing permeability by ∼36%. The overburden sediment’s low in situ permeability (3 to 4 orders of magnitude below permeabilities measured in the gas hydrate-bearing part of the B1 sand (unit B)) suggests the B1 sand′s overburden provides an effective seal. Such a seal promotes efficient production by limiting fluid flow into the reservoir during depressurization-induced gas hydrate dissociation.
SN  - 0887-0624
SN  - 1520-5029
ER  -