Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Corrigendum to "On the Maximum Symmetric Division Deg Index of k-Cyclic Graphs [J. Math. 2022, (2022) \#7783128]"

  • Abeer M. Albalahi
  • Akbar Ali
Open at sourcePDFDOICite

Abstract

The proof of Proposition 1 in the paper [J. Math. 2022, (2022) #7783128] contains a gap, but its statement is correct. Here, we fix this gap.

Related

  1. On the maximum length of cyclic MDS codes
    Gaojun Luo, Xiwang Cao, Shitao Li +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  2. The existence of symmetric cyclic Steiner quadruple systems
    Hengrui Liu, Tao Feng
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. Fair Division of Graphs: Beyond Traceability
    Nicolas Bousquet, Frank Connor, Agnès Totschnig +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. A matroid characterization of the combinatorially symmetric maximum nullity of a graph
    Louis Deaett, Veronika Furst, John Hutchens +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. Bicyclic Graphs with Maximum Complementary Diminished Sombor Index
    Nicholas Smirnov
    Discrete Mathematics LettersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeometry & topologyDOAJ

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@misc{albalahi2026corrigendum,
  title = {{Corrigendum to "On the Maximum Symmetric Division Deg Index of $k$-Cyclic Graphs [J. Math. 2022, (2022) \#7783128]"}},
  author = {Abeer M. Albalahi and Akbar Ali},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.10561},
  eprint = {2609.10561},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10561},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Corrigendum to "On the Maximum Symmetric Division Deg Index of k-Cyclic Graphs [J. Math. 2022, (2022) \#7783128]"
AU  - Abeer M. Albalahi
AU  - Akbar Ali
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.10561
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10561
AB  - The proof of Proposition 1 in the paper [J. Math. 2022, (2022) #7783128] contains a gap, but its statement is correct. Here, we fix this gap.
ER  -