Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDPlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open

Prophylactic Superdrained Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: Systematic Review of Survival and Morbidity.

  • Pamela Brazeau-Porrello1
  • Ayden Watt2
  • Éli Blais3
  • Michel A Danino4
  • Johnny I Efanov4
4 affiliations
  1. 1From the Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  2. 2Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  3. 3Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
  4. 4Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

Background

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard option for autologous tissue reconstruction after total mastectomy. To minimize complication rates, such as venous congestion, adding a second venous anastomosis to support the flap (venous superdrainage) has gained popularity, although the degree of clinical benefit remains unclear. This study presents a systematic review to evaluate the complication profiles of dual venous anastomosis DIEP flap breast reconstruction.Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE was performed to identify studies evaluating venous superdrainage in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Seventeen studies were included, comprising 2964 flaps (1536 single-vein and 1428 dual-vein). Postoperative complications were extracted and reported descriptively, with direct comparisons highlighted when available.Results

Across 17 studies, including 2964 DIEP flaps, dual-venous anastomosis was associated with lower rates of venous-related complications. In the dual-vein group, complication rates were low, including venous congestion (0%-13%), venous thrombosis (0%-2.7%), total flap loss (0%-8.7%), fat necrosis (0%-17.4%), and partial flap loss (0%-13.3%). In contrast, single-vein cohorts demonstrated higher rates of key complications, particularly venous congestion (2.6%-55.1%), venous thrombosis (1.8%-18.8%), fat necrosis (4.9%-48.2%), partial flap loss (up to 44.8%), and total flap loss (up to 17.2%). Hematoma and infection rates were comparable between groups.Conclusions

Optimizing clinical outcomes after DIEP flap breast reconstruction remains an important clinical goal. These results suggest that prophylactic supercharging of the DIEP flap with 2 veins may be associated with lower complication rates in several comparative studies.

Related

  1. Operative management of abdominal bulge following deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review of repair strategies and outcomes
    Raj Saini, Akshay Soni, Felicity Huang +2
    Gland SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Associations of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Weight with Postoperative Complications and Revisions
    Joyce X. Cui, Eric Zeng, Mary L. Duet +5
    Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Short- and Long-term Patency of Prophylactic and Therapeutic Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review
    Adriano Fabi, Séverin R. Wendelspiess, Christian Appenzeller-Herzog +1
    Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Bleeding events in people with hemophilia B on prophylactic factor IX treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kristina Lindsley, Arianna Nevo, Carmine Colavecchia +7
    Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasisPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Early prophylactic low-dose hydrocortisone for bronchopulmonary dysplasia prevention in extremely preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lamar Abu Shehadeh, Tala Adel Al Ghamdi, Rahaf Atiah Alzahrani +6
    Frontiers in PediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsDOAJ

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{brazeauporrello2026prophylactic,
  title = {{Prophylactic Superdrained Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: Systematic Review of Survival and Morbidity.}},
  author = {Pamela Brazeau-Porrello and Ayden Watt and Éli Blais and Michel A Danino and Johnny I Efanov},
  journal = {Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1097/gox.0000000000008185},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903308},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prophylactic Superdrained Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: Systematic Review of Survival and Morbidity.
AU  - Pamela Brazeau-Porrello
AU  - Ayden Watt
AU  - Éli Blais
AU  - Michel A Danino
AU  - Johnny I Efanov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
DO  - 10.1097/gox.0000000000008185
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903308
AB  - Background  The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard option for autologous tissue reconstruction after total mastectomy. To minimize complication rates, such as venous congestion, adding a second venous anastomosis to support the flap (venous superdrainage) has gained popularity, although the degree of clinical benefit remains unclear. This study presents a systematic review to evaluate the complication profiles of dual venous anastomosis DIEP flap breast reconstruction.Methods  A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE was performed to identify studies evaluating venous superdrainage in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Seventeen studies were included, comprising 2964 flaps (1536 single-vein and 1428 dual-vein). Postoperative complications were extracted and reported descriptively, with direct comparisons highlighted when available.Results  Across 17 studies, including 2964 DIEP flaps, dual-venous anastomosis was associated with lower rates of venous-related complications. In the dual-vein group, complication rates were low, including venous congestion (0%-13%), venous thrombosis (0%-2.7%), total flap loss (0%-8.7%), fat necrosis (0%-17.4%), and partial flap loss (0%-13.3%). In contrast, single-vein cohorts demonstrated higher rates of key complications, particularly venous congestion (2.6%-55.1%), venous thrombosis (1.8%-18.8%), fat necrosis (4.9%-48.2%), partial flap loss (up to 44.8%), and total flap loss (up to 17.2%). Hematoma and infection rates were comparable between groups.Conclusions  Optimizing clinical outcomes after DIEP flap breast reconstruction remains an important clinical goal. These results suggest that prophylactic supercharging of the DIEP flap with 2 veins may be associated with lower complication rates in several comparative studies.
SN  - 2169-7574
ER  -