Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in artificial intelligence

A novel Weighted Exponential-Lindley distribution with Bayesian estimation under progressive Type-II censoring and a Bayesian-Calibrated Variational Autoencoder for survival prediction.

  1. 1Department of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
  2. 2Department of Quantum AI, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Abstract

One-parameter lifetime models, such as the exponential and Lindley distributions, and two-parameter extensions such as the weighted Lindley distribution cannot separately control tail weight and dispersion, since a single shape parameter governs both. We address this with the Weighted Exponential-Lindley (WEL) distribution, a three-parameter model built by applying a length-biased weight to a mixture of exponential and Lindley components, with closed-form density, survival function, and an exact two-component gamma mixture representation. Using this representation and Glaser's failure-rate criterion, we prove that the WEL hazard rate is strictly increasing on its entire parameter space, with the scale parameter as its asymptotic level; the weight parameter then gives independent, tunable control over dispersion, skewness, and kurtosis are unavailable in the Lindley or weighted Lindley families. We develop maximum likelihood, method-of-moments, and Bayesian estimation under progressive Type-II censoring, validated through a Monte Carlo study across several parameter configurations and sample sizes, reporting bias, MSE, interval coverage, computation time, and convergence rates, including non-convergent method-of-moments runs rather than only successful ones. We then propose the Bayesian-Calibrated Variational Autoencoder Survival Model (BC-VAESM), whose decoder outputs individual, covariate-dependent WEL parameters, trained end-to-end via a censored negative log-likelihood. We evaluate both contributions on real, publicly available survival datasets, including censored clinical trial data and complete reliability/biological benchmarks, one chosen specifically to illustrate WEL's inability to represent bathtub hazards and one matching its increasing-hazard property. Fitting the censored datasets under an explicit right-censored likelihood, distinguished from the progressive Type-II scheme used in the Bayesian machinery, WEL is compared against an expanded set of competing one-, two-, and three-parameter lifetime models, including further weighted distributions. WEL is the best-fitting model on one dataset but is outperformed on others, and we report all outcomes without selective emphasis. In five-fold cross-validation, the BC-VAESM modestly exceeds a penalized Cox model and an otherwise identical Weibull-decoder autoencoder, though the improvement is not statistically significant at the sample size examined. Every estimate reported here comes from real, reproducible computation on real data.Msc 2020

62N05; 62F15; 62E15; 68T07; 62P10.

Related

  1. A New Extended Exponential Rayleigh Distribution: Estimation and Application
    Dinesh Kumar, Omprakash Prajapati, Sultan Parveen +1
    Reliability: Theory & ApplicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textStatisticsDOAJ
  2. Relative Variability Estimation for the Power Lindley Distribution with Progressive Type-I Interval Censored Data
    Bankitdor M. Nongrum, Adarsha Kumar Jena
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Bayesian Estimation under a Censoring-Adjusted Loss Function for Theakash Distribution with Progressive First-Failure Censoring
    Danush Wijekularathna, Nicholas A. Newman
    Reliability: Theory & ApplicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textStatisticsDOAJ
  4. xVGAE: A Hierarchical Variational Graph Autoencoder for Exchangeable Graphs
    Daniele Micheletti, Federica Zoe Ricci, Erik B. Sudderth
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Theoretical Study on the Evidential Learning-based Variational Autoencoder
    Ge Wang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{ahmed2026novel,
  title = {{A novel Weighted Exponential-Lindley distribution with Bayesian estimation under progressive Type-II censoring and a Bayesian-Calibrated Variational Autoencoder for survival prediction.}},
  author = {P Furqan Ahmed and V Sujatha},
  journal = {Frontiers in artificial intelligence},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/frai.2026.1934204},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909111},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A novel Weighted Exponential-Lindley distribution with Bayesian estimation under progressive Type-II censoring and a Bayesian-Calibrated Variational Autoencoder for survival prediction.
AU  - P Furqan Ahmed
AU  - V Sujatha
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Frontiers in artificial intelligence
DO  - 10.3389/frai.2026.1934204
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909111
AB  - One-parameter lifetime models, such as the exponential and Lindley distributions, and two-parameter extensions such as the weighted Lindley distribution cannot separately control tail weight and dispersion, since a single shape parameter governs both. We address this with the Weighted Exponential-Lindley (WEL) distribution, a three-parameter model built by applying a length-biased weight to a mixture of exponential and Lindley components, with closed-form density, survival function, and an exact two-component gamma mixture representation. Using this representation and Glaser's failure-rate criterion, we prove that the WEL hazard rate is strictly increasing on its entire parameter space, with the scale parameter as its asymptotic level; the weight parameter then gives independent, tunable control over dispersion, skewness, and kurtosis are unavailable in the Lindley or weighted Lindley families. We develop maximum likelihood, method-of-moments, and Bayesian estimation under progressive Type-II censoring, validated through a Monte Carlo study across several parameter configurations and sample sizes, reporting bias, MSE, interval coverage, computation time, and convergence rates, including non-convergent method-of-moments runs rather than only successful ones. We then propose the Bayesian-Calibrated Variational Autoencoder Survival Model (BC-VAESM), whose decoder outputs individual, covariate-dependent WEL parameters, trained end-to-end via a censored negative log-likelihood. We evaluate both contributions on real, publicly available survival datasets, including censored clinical trial data and complete reliability/biological benchmarks, one chosen specifically to illustrate WEL's inability to represent bathtub hazards and one matching its increasing-hazard property. Fitting the censored datasets under an explicit right-censored likelihood, distinguished from the progressive Type-II scheme used in the Bayesian machinery, WEL is compared against an expanded set of competing one-, two-, and three-parameter lifetime models, including further weighted distributions. WEL is the best-fitting model on one dataset but is outperformed on others, and we report all outcomes without selective emphasis. In five-fold cross-validation, the BC-VAESM modestly exceeds a penalized Cox model and an otherwise identical Weibull-decoder autoencoder, though the improvement is not statistically significant at the sample size examined. Every estimate reported here comes from real, reproducible computation on real data.Msc 2020  62N05; 62F15; 62E15; 68T07; 62P10.
SN  - 2624-8212
ER  -