Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintCC BY-SA 4.0arXiv

Deep kernel hedging

Abstract

We introduce a deep kernel hedging framework that combines the flexibility of deep learning with the structural inductive bias of kernel methods. The hedging functional is restricted to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space whose kernel is parameterized through a neural network embedding of the input features. The framework minimizes a regularized empirical risk under convex loss functions and can accommodate path-dependent information through truncated time-augmented signature features. We derive a generalized representer theorem for the joint hedging problem, reducing the empirical optimization to a finite-dimensional problem. To further reduce the computational cost associated with large kernel matrices, we develop a scalable random Fourier feature approximation and establish convergence guarantees. The random Fourier parameters are sampled once and remain fixed throughout training, while the deep kernel adapts to market data through the learned neural representation. We evaluate the performance of the proposed deep kernel approach on both synthetic and real data and compare it with standard kernel methods and classical deep hedging architectures. Numerical results indicate competitive and robust hedging performance, particularly in low-data regimes, which highlights the benefits of combining expressive neural representations with the inductive bias of kernel methods.

Related

  1. Adversarial Training for Deep Hedging in Nonstationary Markets
    Philipp J. Schneider, Lukas Looser, Antoine Garin +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Doubly Robust Deep Kernel Tests for Structured Outcomes
    Robin Leman, Bariscan Bozkurt, Sofiane Tanji +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Asynchronous Parallel Computation of Lagrangian Bounds for Mixed-Integer Stochastic Programs by Frank-Wolfe Methods within Projective Hedging
    Jonathan Eckstein, Jean-Paul Watson, David L. Woodruff
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. When Hedging Changes the Payoff: Option Replication with Price Impact and Execution Costs
    David Itkin, Leandro Sánchez-Betancourt
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  5. Variance-Optimal Hedging in the Rough Hawkes--Heston Model
    Yingli Wang, Xiaoyu Wang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{dupret2026deep,
  title = {{Deep kernel hedging}},
  author = {Jean-Loup Dupret and Donatien Hainaut and Edouard Motte},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.34474},
  eprint = {2609.34474},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34474},
  note = {CC BY-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Deep kernel hedging
AU  - Jean-Loup Dupret
AU  - Donatien Hainaut
AU  - Edouard Motte
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.34474
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34474
AB  - We introduce a deep kernel hedging framework that combines the flexibility of deep learning with the structural inductive bias of kernel methods. The hedging functional is restricted to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space whose kernel is parameterized through a neural network embedding of the input features. The framework minimizes a regularized empirical risk under convex loss functions and can accommodate path-dependent information through truncated time-augmented signature features. We derive a generalized representer theorem for the joint hedging problem, reducing the empirical optimization to a finite-dimensional problem. To further reduce the computational cost associated with large kernel matrices, we develop a scalable random Fourier feature approximation and establish convergence guarantees. The random Fourier parameters are sampled once and remain fixed throughout training, while the deep kernel adapts to market data through the learned neural representation. We evaluate the performance of the proposed deep kernel approach on both synthetic and real data and compare it with standard kernel methods and classical deep hedging architectures. Numerical results indicate competitive and robust hedging performance, particularly in low-data regimes, which highlights the benefits of combining expressive neural representations with the inductive bias of kernel methods.
ER  -