Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Available time-series of terrestrial animals provide low reliability in population trend estimates

  1. 1Estacion Biologica de Doñana

Abstract

Monitoring biodiversity through time is critical for understanding the impacts of global change, yet the reliability of available time-series for estimating population trends remains poorly studied. We simulated population dynamics to study how monitoring duration, inter-annual variability, and temporal autocorrelation influence trend reliability. We then inferred the expected reliability of 16,450 empirical time-series of terrestrial animals based on those simulations. Longer, less variable, and negatively autocorrelated time-series produced more reliable trend estimates. Time-series shorter than 20 years led to large magnitude errors and low power in estimating population trends, despite generally low sign uncertainty. Overall, 80% of the empirical time-series were too short and/or noisy to identify meaningful temporal trends, yet reliability varies among taxa. Our results show important limitations in the available biodiversity data, stressing the need to sustain long-term monitoring to better estimate population trends, a top priority in the current biodiversity crisis.

Related

  1. Re-evaluating molecular clock maximum age calibrations revives pre-Ediacaran divergence estimates for animals
    Orin M. Lole Durbin, Eliel S.C. Anttila, Derek E.G. Briggs +2
    Science AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BYEvolutionary biologyCrossref
  2. Scan-sampling interval shapes the reliability of immersion-activity estimates in captive penguins
    Takashi Yamamoto, Tomohiro Kakizaki, Yukari Takashima +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0EcologyCrossref
  3. A shared multi-feature population code for sensory reliability across mouse visual cortex
    Elizabeth M. Edwards, Megan H. Lipton, Anne B. Sereno +1
    Cell ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0General biologyCrossref
  4. Priorities for hearing loss prevention based on population attributable fraction estimates: a cross-sectional analysis within the China national health survey 2023
    Haibo Huang, Yue Fan, Fangxu Yan +19
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0NeuroscienceCrossref
  5. Geometric Reliability of Neural Population Codes: Sampling Calibration and Within-Session Nonstationarity
    Prashant C. Raju
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textBioinformatics & computational biologyNeurosciencearXiv
BibTeX
@misc{aledo2026available,
  title = {{Available time-series of terrestrial animals provide low reliability in population trend estimates}},
  author = {J. G. de Aledo and I. Bartomeus and F. Duchenne},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.14.759066},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.14.759066v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Available time-series of terrestrial animals provide low reliability in population trend estimates
AU  - J. G. de Aledo
AU  - I. Bartomeus
AU  - F. Duchenne
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.14.759066
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.14.759066v1
AB  - Monitoring biodiversity through time is critical for understanding the impacts of global change, yet the reliability of available time-series for estimating population trends remains poorly studied. We simulated population dynamics to study how monitoring duration, inter-annual variability, and temporal autocorrelation influence trend reliability. We then inferred the expected reliability of 16,450 empirical time-series of terrestrial animals based on those simulations. Longer, less variable, and negatively autocorrelated time-series produced more reliable trend estimates. Time-series shorter than 20 years led to large magnitude errors and low power in estimating population trends, despite generally low sign uncertainty. Overall, 80% of the empirical time-series were too short and/or noisy to identify meaningful temporal trends, yet reliability varies among taxa. Our results show important limitations in the available biodiversity data, stressing the need to sustain long-term monitoring to better estimate population trends, a top priority in the current biodiversity crisis.
ER  -