The Role of Stress and Resilience Profiles in Emotional Health
- 1College of Health and Human Sciences, Department of Human Development and Family Studies Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USA
Abstract
Distal and proximal life stressors, including past trauma, subjective social status, and perceived stress can accumulate over time, placing strain on the body and contributing to increased allostatic load. Consequently, those with heightened stress experiences are at elevated risk of both mental and physical health concerns. However, research suggests that resilience may be a seminal protective factor, often safeguarding against negative health outcomes in the context of stress. Despite the extensive research base in stress and resilience, limited investigations have focused on how they co‐occur and shape emotion processes. The current study strives to address these gaps by (1) exploring patterns of distal and proximal stress and resilience and (2) mapping these patterns onto two emotion processes found to have significant influence on health outcomes: emotion regulation and emotionality stigma. A sample of 329 adults (M
age = 37.83, SD age = 11.86) were recruited using an online recruitment system and reported on their experiences of distal and proximal stress, resilience, emotion regulation, and emotionality stigma. Participants primarily identified as non‐Hispanic (90.2%) and White (77.8%), with a household income of less than $55,000 (52.8%). Using latent profile analysis (LPA), three unique subgroups emerged based on the co‐occurrence of distal and proximal stressors with resilience: (1) low stress, high resilience, (2) high proximal stress, low resilience, and (3) high distal stress, moderate resilience. These profiles were significantly associated with emotion processes such that those in the high proximal stress, low resilience profile reported significantly lower emotion regulation than those in the other two profiles. Participants in both higher‐stress profiles reported significantly greater emotionality stigma than those in the low stress, high resilience profile. Finding implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Related
- Cognitive–emotional associations between non-restorative sleep and erectile dysfunction: the role of rumination profiles and resilience
- Latent Profiles of Maternal Parenting Stress Moderate the Relationship Between Overparenting and Young Children's Social-Emotional Competence.
- Role of Psychological Resilience on Emotional Health in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients.
- Associations between the Chinese physical education and health Curriculum model to the psychological stress of junior middle school students: The chain mediating role of psychological resilience and physical self-efficacy
- Risk and protective factors for posttraumatic stress disorder among Israeli civilians in the aftermath of 7 October: the TERUMAH (Trauma, Civic Engagement, Resilience and Health) study
BibTeX
@article{seely2026role,
title = {{The Role of Stress and Resilience Profiles in Emotional Health}},
author = {Hayley D. Seely and Samantha M. Brown},
journal = {Journal of Community Psychology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1002/jcop.70161},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.70161},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The Role of Stress and Resilience Profiles in Emotional Health
AU - Hayley D. Seely
AU - Samantha M. Brown
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - Journal of Community Psychology
DO - 10.1002/jcop.70161
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.70161
AB - Distal and proximal life stressors, including past trauma, subjective social status, and perceived stress can accumulate over time, placing strain on the body and contributing to increased allostatic load. Consequently, those with heightened stress experiences are at elevated risk of both mental and physical health concerns. However, research suggests that resilience may be a seminal protective factor, often safeguarding against negative health outcomes in the context of stress. Despite the extensive research base in stress and resilience, limited investigations have focused on how they co‐occur and shape emotion processes. The current study strives to address these gaps by (1) exploring patterns of distal and proximal stress and resilience and (2) mapping these patterns onto two emotion processes found to have significant influence on health outcomes: emotion regulation and emotionality stigma. A sample of 329 adults (M age = 37.83, SD age = 11.86) were recruited using an online recruitment system and reported on their experiences of distal and proximal stress, resilience, emotion regulation, and emotionality stigma. Participants primarily identified as non‐Hispanic (90.2%) and White (77.8%), with a household income of less than $55,000 (52.8%). Using latent profile analysis (LPA), three unique subgroups emerged based on the co‐occurrence of distal and proximal stressors with resilience: (1) low stress, high resilience, (2) high proximal stress, low resilience, and (3) high distal stress, moderate resilience. These profiles were significantly associated with emotion processes such that those in the high proximal stress, low resilience profile reported significantly lower emotion regulation than those in the other two profiles. Participants in both higher‐stress profiles reported significantly greater emotionality stigma than those in the low stress, high resilience profile. Finding implications for future research and practice are discussed.
SN - 0090-4392
SN - 1520-6629
ER -