Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Sequestered Lumbar Disc Herniation Mimicking a Spinal Tumor: A Case Report.

  1. 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen, Solingen, DEU.
  2. 2Department of Neuropathology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, DEU.

Abstract

Sequestered lumbar disc fragments are a well-recognized cause of radiculopathy; however, when disc material demonstrates contrast enhancement, it may closely resemble an intraspinal tumor on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), leading to diagnostic uncertainty, particularly in patients with a history of malignancy. We present the case of a 75-year-old man with a history of sigmoid and prostate carcinomas who presented with persistent low back pain and right-sided radicular symptoms for two months. Neurological examination revealed no motor deficit, with preserved strength of 5/5, although intermittent paresthesia and hyperesthesia and a positive right straight-leg-raise test were present. MRI demonstrated an irregularly shaped, contrast-enhancing lateral extradural lesion at L4/L5, measuring approximately 29 × 13 × 10 mm and maintaining contact with both the anterior and posterior epidural spaces. Associated degenerative changes included loss of disc height and facet arthropathy without relevant central spinal canal stenosis. Given the patient's oncological history and the radiological appearance, an extradural spinal neoplasm was suspected. Approximately one month after MRI, a right-sided L4 hemilaminectomy was performed, and histopathological examination confirmed a sequestered lumbar disc fragment without evidence of malignancy. The patient was pain-free at discharge, and his radicular symptoms had completely resolved. At the three-month outpatient follow-up, he remained symptom-free, and no follow-up MRI was considered clinically indicated. This case highlights the importance of considering sequestered disc fragments in the differential diagnosis of contrast-enhancing extradural spinal lesions, even when the lesion is not located in an atypical epidural compartment. When imaging findings remain inconclusive, surgical exploration with histopathological confirmation may be required to establish the correct diagnosis and guide appropriate management.

Related

  1. Tumor-mimicking lumbar intradural disc herniation managed with unilateral biportal endoscopy: a case report
    Bin He, Tao Huang, Haitao Tan +2
    Journal of Surgical Case ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  2. Arthroscopic-assisted uniportal spinal surgery with bone-anchored annular repair for far lateral lumbar disc herniation: A case report.
    Hao Cao, Xin Zhang, Shili Chen +3
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Clinical outcomes of uni-portal non-coaxial spinal endoscopic surgery for severe caudally migrated lumbar disc herniation with free fragments
    Hongshun Zhao, Shihao Zhou, Tianluo Guo +9
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Occult Proximal Femur Fractures Mimicking Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Masahiro Kawanishi, Naokado Ikeda, Hidekazu Tanaka +2
    Spine surgery and related researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. Primary lumbar mesenchymal chondrosarcoma mimicking a cauda equina tumor: An exceptionally rare spinal tumor.
    Heng Yu Wei, Chan Wei Wen, Nishan Rao Subramaniam +2
    Surgical neurology internationalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{khader2026sequestered,
  title = {{Sequestered Lumbar Disc Herniation Mimicking a Spinal Tumor: A Case Report.}},
  author = {Ghaith Khader and Ivan Momotiuk and Mohamad-Khir Alkorayshi and Ralf Buhl},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.116552},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42899275},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Sequestered Lumbar Disc Herniation Mimicking a Spinal Tumor: A Case Report.
AU  - Ghaith Khader
AU  - Ivan Momotiuk
AU  - Mohamad-Khir Alkorayshi
AU  - Ralf Buhl
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/19
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.116552
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42899275
AB  - Sequestered lumbar disc fragments are a well-recognized cause of radiculopathy; however, when disc material demonstrates contrast enhancement, it may closely resemble an intraspinal tumor on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), leading to diagnostic uncertainty, particularly in patients with a history of malignancy. We present the case of a 75-year-old man with a history of sigmoid and prostate carcinomas who presented with persistent low back pain and right-sided radicular symptoms for two months. Neurological examination revealed no motor deficit, with preserved strength of 5/5, although intermittent paresthesia and hyperesthesia and a positive right straight-leg-raise test were present. MRI demonstrated an irregularly shaped, contrast-enhancing lateral extradural lesion at L4/L5, measuring approximately 29 × 13 × 10 mm and maintaining contact with both the anterior and posterior epidural spaces. Associated degenerative changes included loss of disc height and facet arthropathy without relevant central spinal canal stenosis. Given the patient's oncological history and the radiological appearance, an extradural spinal neoplasm was suspected. Approximately one month after MRI, a right-sided L4 hemilaminectomy was performed, and histopathological examination confirmed a sequestered lumbar disc fragment without evidence of malignancy. The patient was pain-free at discharge, and his radicular symptoms had completely resolved. At the three-month outpatient follow-up, he remained symptom-free, and no follow-up MRI was considered clinically indicated. This case highlights the importance of considering sequestered disc fragments in the differential diagnosis of contrast-enhancing extradural spinal lesions, even when the lesion is not located in an atypical epidural compartment. When imaging findings remain inconclusive, surgical exploration with histopathological confirmation may be required to establish the correct diagnosis and guide appropriate management.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -