Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Does specific membrane surface area constrain Escherichia coli energy spillage and therefore aerobic and anaerobic growth rates?

  1. 1Montana State University

Abstract

The physical dimensions of bacterial cells are finite, tightly regulated, and constrain phenotype based on cell surface area to volume ratios. Additionally, bacterial membranes have limited capacity to host proteins, constraining enzymatic potential per area. We combine these biophysical properties into an aggregate parameter termed specific membrane surface area (sMSA, nm2 gcdw-1) which is readily integrated into systems biology analyses including constraint-based stoichiometric models. sMSA-based analyses have remarkable agency to predict and interpret bacterial phenotypes including maximum growth rate, respiration efficiency, and potential for maintenance energy generation. The presented Escherichia coli research 1) quantitatively recreates the membrane proteome from central metabolism as a function of growth rate, 2) demonstrates that the maximum growth rate of both aerobic and anaerobic E. coli cultures abides by similar cell biology constraints including a Pareto tradeoff between simultaneous synthesis of biomass macromolecules and generation of maintenance energy, 3) quantifies the areal capacity of E. coli membranes to dissipate Gibbs energy during enthalpic and entropic dominated metabolisms, and 4) presents evidence that sMSA theory could permit isogenic populations to host multiple concurrent phenotypes with equivalent fitness metrics.The results support our sMSA theory, based on cell geometry and membrane enzyme capacity, as a substantial driver of metabolism in both oxic and anoxic environments.

Related

  1. Cell geometry and membrane protein crowding constrain Escherichia coli growth rate, overflow metabolism, respiration, and maintenance energy
    Ross P. Carlson, Tomáš Gedeon, Mauricio Garcia Benitez +4
    FEBS LettersPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC13 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationGenetics & genomicsOpenAlex
  2. A lipoprotein partner for the Escherichia coli outer membrane protein TolC
    Jim Horne, Elise Kaplan, Ben Jin +9
    eLifePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedStructural biologyMicrobiologyHAL
  3. Insights Into an Antibacterial Type VI Membrane-Disrupting Effector Of Adherent Invasive Escherichia coli
    M. Chabalier, H. Botchorichvili, L. M. Billard +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  4. MinC influences the Min oscillation period in Escherichia coli by priming MinD on the membrane
    C. N. Ferreira, C. E. Trebino, S. Bartlett +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NDFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  5. A Specific Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction of Flagellin Can Drive Motility in Salmonella enterica but not Escherichia coli
    J. Scadden, J. S. Philip, P. Ridone +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{putnam2026does,
  title = {{Does specific membrane surface area constrain Escherichia coli energy spillage and therefore aerobic and anaerobic growth rates?}},
  author = {C. Putnam and S. E. Wilken and A. E. Beck and M. Beyss and O. Ebenhoeh and K. Noeh and R. Carlson},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.13.758985},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.13.758985v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Does specific membrane surface area constrain Escherichia coli energy spillage and therefore aerobic and anaerobic growth rates?
AU  - C. Putnam
AU  - S. E. Wilken
AU  - A. E. Beck
AU  - M. Beyss
AU  - O. Ebenhoeh
AU  - K. Noeh
AU  - R. Carlson
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.13.758985
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.13.758985v1
AB  - The physical dimensions of bacterial cells are finite, tightly regulated, and constrain phenotype based on cell surface area to volume ratios. Additionally, bacterial membranes have limited capacity to host proteins, constraining enzymatic potential per area. We combine these biophysical properties into an aggregate parameter termed specific membrane surface area (sMSA, nm2 gcdw-1) which is readily integrated into systems biology analyses including constraint-based stoichiometric models. sMSA-based analyses have remarkable agency to predict and interpret bacterial phenotypes including maximum growth rate, respiration efficiency, and potential for maintenance energy generation. The presented Escherichia coli research 1) quantitatively recreates the membrane proteome from central metabolism as a function of growth rate, 2) demonstrates that the maximum growth rate of both aerobic and anaerobic E. coli cultures abides by similar cell biology constraints including a Pareto tradeoff between simultaneous synthesis of biomass macromolecules and generation of maintenance energy, 3) quantifies the areal capacity of E. coli membranes to dissipate Gibbs energy during enthalpic and entropic dominated metabolisms, and 4) presents evidence that sMSA theory could permit isogenic populations to host multiple concurrent phenotypes with equivalent fitness metrics.The results support our sMSA theory, based on cell geometry and membrane enzyme capacity, as a substantial driver of metabolism in both oxic and anoxic environments.
ER  -