Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios in Patients with Pterygium: A Retrospective CaseControl Study

  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Medicana International Samsun Hospital, Samsun 55080, Türkiye
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon 61080, Türkiye

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Inflammation is implicated in pterygium, but whether routine blood-count indices are associated with pterygium independently of age is unclear. We evaluated the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in systemically healthy patients with pterygium and systemically healthy controls undergoing strabismus surgery. Methods: This retrospective case-control study compared preoperative NLR and PLR in 100 patients undergoing pterygium surgery (2010–2019) and 86 systemically healthy adult controls undergoing strabismus surgery. Analyses included Holm-corrected Mann–Whitney tests, age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and age-restricted and age-matched sensitivity analyses. Results: Patients with pterygium were older (48.3 vs. 29.4 years) and had higher NLR (1.98 vs. 1.66) and PLR (128.1 vs. 114.3) (Holm-adjusted p = 0.006 and 0.005, respectively). After adjustment for age and sex, NLR remained associated with pterygium (odds ratio [OR] 3.18 per unit; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54–6.57; p = 0.002), whereas PLR did not (p = 0.106). In 39 age- and sex-matched pairs, differences were directionally similar but not statistically significant. Areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.632 for NLR and 0.637 for PLR. Neither index differed by pterygium grade or recurrence. Conclusions: NLR, but not PLR, was independently associated with pterygium after adjustment for age and sex, although this association was not confirmed in the small matched subsample. Neither index demonstrated sufficient diagnostic performance to serve as a biomarker. Prospective age-matched studies are needed.

Related

  1. Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Other Predictors of Delayed Wound Healing After Anal Fistula Surgery: A Retrospective Study.
    Ting Yang, Tao He, Aiping Tan +1
    Journal of multidisciplinary healthcarePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textOncologyEurope PMCPMC
  2. Associations of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios with amputation risk in patients with diabetic foot disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yalan Liu, Dan Jiang, Aobo Zhu +6
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismDOAJ
  3. Admission White Blood Cell Count and Neutrophil‐to‐Lymphocyte Ratio for Early Risk Stratification after Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Guangyan Li, Gang Wang, Yuhang Hui +3
    Brain and behaviorPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Nursing and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia: A Retrospective Study
    Yuki Hiraoka, Takashi Ogasawara, Ei Kishimoto +6
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedOncologyJ-STAGE
  5. A novel Hemoglobin-Albumin-Lymphocyte-Platelet (HALP)-based prognostic model to predict the progression of premenopausal breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
    Sirui Zhang, Lingyun Xu, Wenting Peng
    BMC cancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ozbay2026neutrophiltolymphocyte,
  title = {{Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios in Patients with Pterygium: A Retrospective CaseControl Study}},
  author = {Ahmet Duhan Özbay and Adem Türk and Gökhan Özgür},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15208172},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/8172},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios in Patients with Pterygium: A Retrospective CaseControl Study
AU  - Ahmet Duhan Özbay
AU  - Adem Türk
AU  - Gökhan Özgür
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15208172
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/8172
AB  - Background/Objectives: Inflammation is implicated in pterygium, but whether routine blood-count indices are associated with pterygium independently of age is unclear. We evaluated the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in systemically healthy patients with pterygium and systemically healthy controls undergoing strabismus surgery. Methods: This retrospective case-control study compared preoperative NLR and PLR in 100 patients undergoing pterygium surgery (2010–2019) and 86 systemically healthy adult controls undergoing strabismus surgery. Analyses included Holm-corrected Mann–Whitney tests, age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and age-restricted and age-matched sensitivity analyses. Results: Patients with pterygium were older (48.3 vs. 29.4 years) and had higher NLR (1.98 vs. 1.66) and PLR (128.1 vs. 114.3) (Holm-adjusted p = 0.006 and 0.005, respectively). After adjustment for age and sex, NLR remained associated with pterygium (odds ratio [OR] 3.18 per unit; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54–6.57; p = 0.002), whereas PLR did not (p = 0.106). In 39 age- and sex-matched pairs, differences were directionally similar but not statistically significant. Areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.632 for NLR and 0.637 for PLR. Neither index differed by pterygium grade or recurrence. Conclusions: NLR, but not PLR, was independently associated with pterygium after adjustment for age and sex, although this association was not confirmed in the small matched subsample. Neither index demonstrated sufficient diagnostic performance to serve as a biomarker. Prospective age-matched studies are needed.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -