Clinical translation of liquid biopsy in early cancer screening: biofluid selection, model construction, and clinical validation
5 affiliations
- 1Shenzhen Rapha Biotechnology Inc.
- 2Cancer Center, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology General Hospital
- 3Department of Oncology, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal, Cancer Translational Research, Cancer Institute, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
- 4Department of Endoscopy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Medical University, and Henan Key Laboratory of the Prevention and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer
- 5School of Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen Technology University
Abstract
Global cancer incidence continues to rise, underscoring the urgent need for effective early detection strategies. Liquid biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive approach, yet only a limited number of assays have successfully transitioned from research to clinical practice. This review examines the critical decisions and challenges encountered along the translational pathway for liquid biopsy based early cancer screening, covering biofluid selection, biomarker characteristics, multi-omics integration, model construction, and the hierarchy of clinical evidence. We highlight the importance of biologically driven complementarity in biomarker combination, rigorous control group design, and prospective real-world validation, while also identifying key gaps that currently constrain clinical adoption. Collectively, these considerations aim to inform more efficient development strategies and help bridge the gap between technological innovation and clinically impactful tests.
Related
- Construction and validation of a frailty screening model for older adults with cataract: a cross-sectional study
- From wrist to heart: clinical validation and real-world translation of wearable and portable AI-enhanced electrocardiography
- Deep-Learning-Based Assessment of Breast Arterial Calcification on Mammography: Technical Validation, Cardiovascular Prognostic Value, and Clinical Translation—A Narrative Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions: Evidence, Validation, and Clinical Translation
- Assessing coercive control in intimate partner relationships: psychometric validation and clinical thresholds of a French version of the Coercive Control Screening Scale (CCSS-F)
BibTeX
@article{cui2026clinical,
title = {{Clinical translation of liquid biopsy in early cancer screening: biofluid selection, model construction, and clinical validation}},
author = {Pin Cui and Shu Xu and Xiaohui Lin and Shiyi Song and Bingding Huang and Zhiming Xu},
journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1946352},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1946352/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Clinical translation of liquid biopsy in early cancer screening: biofluid selection, model construction, and clinical validation
AU - Pin Cui
AU - Shu Xu
AU - Xiaohui Lin
AU - Shiyi Song
AU - Bingding Huang
AU - Zhiming Xu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1946352
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1946352/full
AB - Global cancer incidence continues to rise, underscoring the urgent need for effective early detection strategies. Liquid biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive approach, yet only a limited number of assays have successfully transitioned from research to clinical practice. This review examines the critical decisions and challenges encountered along the translational pathway for liquid biopsy based early cancer screening, covering biofluid selection, biomarker characteristics, multi-omics integration, model construction, and the hierarchy of clinical evidence. We highlight the importance of biologically driven complementarity in biomarker combination, rigorous control group design, and prospective real-world validation, while also identifying key gaps that currently constrain clinical adoption. Collectively, these considerations aim to inform more efficient development strategies and help bridge the gap between technological innovation and clinically impactful tests.
SN - 2234-943X
ER -