Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Oracle-Tree Forcing and Wilfs Inequality for Thirteen Left Elements

Abstract

We study filter-Laver forcing on omegaxomega with successor sets containing final quadrants. The observation retaining the minimum coordinate and orientation is a complete projection. Its finite nontrivial hidden-label quotients are Cohen, whereas the full offset quotient has Boolean density equal to the ground-model dominating number dV . For the associated grid-meager ideal I_box, we prove cov(I_box) = add(M) for the usual meager ideal M, and obtain further cardinal bounds. We also analyze threshold games, oracle degrees and the distinction between positive and filter-large certificate sets: recurrent filter-large acceptance admits refinements whose every branch succeeds. As an arithmetic application, we prove Wilfs inequality c \leq 13e for numerical semigroups with thirteen elements below the conductor c, where eis the embedding dimension. A complete arithmetic proof, including a bounded exact computation, is given in the appendix. Its terminating certificate procedures supply a computable quadrant tree and uniform refinements for every forcing condition. Finite support kernels describe persistence of the registered proofs; arithmetic absoluteness explains precisely why forcing organizes these certificates without replacing their arithmetic justification.

Related

  1. CM fibers of Shimura parametrizations and thirteen proofs of the class number one theorem
    Jingxuan Geng
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. A New Method that can Generate Ramsey Colourings for Eight and Thirteen Colours
    Charles Gretton, Tomasz Kowalski, Richard Pennifold +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. Thirteen Results in Magnitude Theory
    Venkata Siddharth Pendyala
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. An extension of Subcomplete Forcing Axiom which implies diamondsuit+
    Hiroshi Sakai
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textLogic & foundationsarXiv
  5. A Nearly Quadratic Lower Bound for Linear Optimization over Convex Bodies in the Membership Oracle Model
    Santosh S. Vempala
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{gaspar2026oracletree,
  title = {{Oracle-Tree Forcing and Wilfs Inequality for Thirteen Left Elements}},
  author = {Michel Gaspar},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.32078},
  eprint = {2609.32078},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32078},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Oracle-Tree Forcing and Wilfs Inequality for Thirteen Left Elements
AU  - Michel Gaspar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.32078
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32078
AB  - We study filter-Laver forcing on omegaxomega with successor sets containing final quadrants. The observation retaining the minimum coordinate and orientation is a complete projection. Its finite nontrivial hidden-label quotients are Cohen, whereas the full offset quotient has Boolean density equal to the ground-model dominating number dV . For the associated grid-meager ideal I_box, we prove cov(I_box) = add(M) for the usual meager ideal M, and obtain further cardinal bounds. We also analyze threshold games, oracle degrees and the distinction between positive and filter-large certificate sets: recurrent filter-large acceptance admits refinements whose every branch succeeds. As an arithmetic application, we prove Wilfs inequality c \leq 13e for numerical semigroups with thirteen elements below the conductor c, where eis the embedding dimension. A complete arithmetic proof, including a bounded exact computation, is given in the appendix. Its terminating certificate procedures supply a computable quadrant tree and uniform refinements for every forcing condition. Finite support kernels describe persistence of the registered proofs; arithmetic absoluteness explains precisely why forcing organizes these certificates without replacing their arithmetic justification.
ER  -