Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
184,937 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Milky Way Near Twins (MWNeTs). II. Applications of a Hierarchical Framework to NGC 3521, NGC 2903, UGC 11487, and CGCG 047-026

Abstract

Galaxies resembling the Milky Way in present-day global properties may have followed different evolutionary histories. The Milky Way Near Twins (MWNeT) framework introduced in Paper~I addresses this through seven successive stages of present-day compatibility and evolutionary diagnostics. We apply this framework to NGC~3521, NGC~2903, UGC~11487, and CGCG~047-026, spanning different levels of observational completeness and outcomes within the hierarchy. We combine archival measurements with analyses of galaxy structure, spectral-energy-distribution similarity, atomic-gas profiles, and optical nuclear diagnostics. Stages~I--IV assess environmental, structural, nuclear, and global compatibility; Stages~V--VII examine SEDs, rotation curves, and evolutionary fingerprints. We distinguish supported compatibility, partial agreement, measured incompatibility, and unconstrained diagnostics. We jointly assess these four galaxies within the MWNeT framework for the first time and derive new structural, SED-comparison, and H\,{\sc i} profile measurements for UGC~11487. NGC~2903 is a well-constrained benchmark, whereas NGC~3521 combines extensive evolutionary information with uncertain bar identification. UGC~11487 has a securely detected bar, quantitative UV--IR SED similarity, and distinctive transient nuclear tracers, but its nominal stellar mass lies below the adopted interval and its extended rotation curve remains unconstrained. CGCG~047-026 meets the initial environmental, structural, and nuclear-state criteria but remains largely unconstrained at higher stages. The four applications demonstrate the framework's ability to organise complementary evidence and identify observational priorities without equating missing data with physical incompatibility. They establish a basis for future systematic searches and for using candidate near twins as external laboratories of Milky Way evolution.

Related

  1. Milky Way Near Twins (MWNeTs). I. A Hierarchical Framework for Identifying Candidate Evolutionary Counterparts of the Milky Way
    I. B. Vavilova, A. M. Dmytrenko, D. V. Dobrycheva +8
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
  2. Early steps in the hierarchical assembly of a Milky Way-mass galaxy 1 Gyr after the Big Bang
    Yoshihisa Asada, Marcin Sawicki, Guillaume Desprez +14
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGalaxiesarXiv
  3. An improved standardization framework for Type II-P supernovae using a hierarchical Bayesian approach
    A. Holas, S. Taubenberger, C. Vogl +41
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsCosmologyCrossref
  4. Everything Everywhere All At Once: A Hierarchical Framework for Mapping Anisotropies in the Local Universe
    Aryan Bansal, Edward N. Taylor, Michelle Cluver +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
  5. A Unified Multi-Band Secular Framework for the Hierarchical Triple PSR J0435+3233 System
    Achamveedu Gopakumar, Vidit Singh, Abhimanyu Susobhanan +9
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{vavilova2026milky,
  title = {{Milky Way Near Twins (MWNeTs). II. Applications of a Hierarchical Framework to NGC 3521, NGC 2903, UGC 11487, and CGCG 047-026}},
  author = {I. B. Vavilova and I. O. Izviekova and A. M. Dmytrenko and O. V. Kompaniiets and O. N. Kukhar and O. S. Pastoven and S. I. Denyschenko and D. V. Dobrycheva and P. N. Fedorov and V. P. Khramtsov and O. Sergijenko and A. A. Vasylenko},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.23327},
  eprint = {2610.23327},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23327},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Milky Way Near Twins (MWNeTs). II. Applications of a Hierarchical Framework to NGC 3521, NGC 2903, UGC 11487, and CGCG 047-026
AU  - I. B. Vavilova
AU  - I. O. Izviekova
AU  - A. M. Dmytrenko
AU  - O. V. Kompaniiets
AU  - O. N. Kukhar
AU  - O. S. Pastoven
AU  - S. I. Denyschenko
AU  - D. V. Dobrycheva
AU  - P. N. Fedorov
AU  - V. P. Khramtsov
AU  - O. Sergijenko
AU  - A. A. Vasylenko
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.23327
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23327
AB  - Galaxies resembling the Milky Way in present-day global properties may have followed different evolutionary histories. The Milky Way Near Twins (MWNeT) framework introduced in Paper~I addresses this through seven successive stages of present-day compatibility and evolutionary diagnostics. We apply this framework to NGC~3521, NGC~2903, UGC~11487, and CGCG~047-026, spanning different levels of observational completeness and outcomes within the hierarchy. We combine archival measurements with analyses of galaxy structure, spectral-energy-distribution similarity, atomic-gas profiles, and optical nuclear diagnostics. Stages~I--IV assess environmental, structural, nuclear, and global compatibility; Stages~V--VII examine SEDs, rotation curves, and evolutionary fingerprints. We distinguish supported compatibility, partial agreement, measured incompatibility, and unconstrained diagnostics. We jointly assess these four galaxies within the MWNeT framework for the first time and derive new structural, SED-comparison, and H\,{\sc i} profile measurements for UGC~11487. NGC~2903 is a well-constrained benchmark, whereas NGC~3521 combines extensive evolutionary information with uncertain bar identification. UGC~11487 has a securely detected bar, quantitative UV--IR SED similarity, and distinctive transient nuclear tracers, but its nominal stellar mass lies below the adopted interval and its extended rotation curve remains unconstrained. CGCG~047-026 meets the initial environmental, structural, and nuclear-state criteria but remains largely unconstrained at higher stages. The four applications demonstrate the framework's ability to organise complementary evidence and identify observational priorities without equating missing data with physical incompatibility. They establish a basis for future systematic searches and for using candidate near twins as external laboratories of Milky Way evolution.
ER  -