Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Mathematics

Risk Reduction Through Reverse Engineering of a Comparison Functional

  1. 1School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK

Abstract

A new concept referred to as a “comparison functional” is introduced for the first time. It provides a unified framework for treating both super-additivity and sub-additivity of a risk-related response. Reverse engineering of the comparison functional serves as a generator of risk-reducing partitions of the input resource. This includes identifying a summable controlling variable, a summable risk-related response, selecting physically feasible aggregation or segmentation operations, and translating these into risk-reducing interventions. In both cases—positive and negative comparison functionals—risk reduction can be achieved through either aggregation or segmentation of the controlling input resource. Only when the comparison functional is zero can no redistribution of the input resource result in risk reduction. Exact lower and upper bounds of the comparison functional have been derived when the risk-related output can be presented as a convex or concave twice-differentiable function continuous in a closed interval. The proposed methodology has been illustrated by a number of application examples covering the case of explicitly specified convex risk-related output and a convex risk-related output whose functional form is unknown.

Related

  1. Comparison of degree and modified reverse degree descriptors incorporating entropy and graph energy analysis for graphene allotropes
    M. Regina Celine, A. Berin Greeni
    Frontiers in ChemistryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsPMC
  2. Reverse Urysohn inequality for functions and functional Shephard problem
    Vadim Gorev
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  3. Risk Measures in Reliability Engineering: Comparison, Duality and Decision-Making
    Marie Temple-Boyer, Emma Cussenot, Guillaume Perrin +4
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsHAL
  4. Climate Change Finance and Carbon Offsets: Addressing Global Climate Challenges through Innovative Funding and Emissions Reduction Mechanisms
    Monday Sunday Adiaha
    Journal of the University of RuhunaPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEcologyClimate scienceHAL
  5. Functional Projection and Complexity Reduction
    Vera Fischer, Yurii Khomskii, Yipu Li +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textLogic & foundationsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{todinov2026risk,
  title = {{Risk Reduction Through Reverse Engineering of a Comparison Functional}},
  author = {Michael Todinov},
  journal = {Mathematics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/math14193562},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/19/3562},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Risk Reduction Through Reverse Engineering of a Comparison Functional
AU  - Michael Todinov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Mathematics
DO  - 10.3390/math14193562
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/19/3562
AB  - A new concept referred to as a “comparison functional” is introduced for the first time. It provides a unified framework for treating both super-additivity and sub-additivity of a risk-related response. Reverse engineering of the comparison functional serves as a generator of risk-reducing partitions of the input resource. This includes identifying a summable controlling variable, a summable risk-related response, selecting physically feasible aggregation or segmentation operations, and translating these into risk-reducing interventions. In both cases—positive and negative comparison functionals—risk reduction can be achieved through either aggregation or segmentation of the controlling input resource. Only when the comparison functional is zero can no redistribution of the input resource result in risk reduction. Exact lower and upper bounds of the comparison functional have been derived when the risk-related output can be presented as a convex or concave twice-differentiable function continuous in a closed interval. The proposed methodology has been illustrated by a number of application examples covering the case of explicitly specified convex risk-related output and a convex risk-related output whose functional form is unknown.
SN  - 2227-7390
ER  -